Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 182 - 193, 30.09.2018

Öz

Purpose- The
aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the amount of cargo
carried by the railway and economic activities of Turkey, and to contribute to
Turkey's determination of the required investment amount by detecting the
amount of increase in potential demand of railway transport in our country's
progress in achieving the objectives of the 2023 vision.  In addition, the emphasis on railways in the
transport process will make a significant contribution to the green supply
chain objectives by reducing losses to the environment.

Methodology- In
this study, methodology consists of three methods; firstly, the amount of cargo
transported by railways and Turkey's trade volume were analyzed by econometric
techniques covering the years 1977-2016, and the coefficients were used to
forecast cargo transportation by railways in 2023; secondly, the European Union
countries that have similar nature with Turkey were tried to be determined by
hierarchical clustering analysis; and thirdly, a data envelopment analysis was
implemented to these identified countries. Because, the efficient usage of
current infrastructure is also important for planning future investment needs.

Findings- As a
result of the econometric analysis, a significant positive relationship was
found between the variables. A 1% increase in trade volume leads to an increase
of about 0.35% in freight loads on rail transport, consequently the increase in
the transported cargo was calculated as 85%. According to cluster analysis,
Turkey was placed in a group which included United Kingdom, France and Italy,
and was the least efficient country in the group considering the results of the
data envelopment analysis.







Conclusion- As a result of these analyzes, it was
determined that in order to effectively serve the 1.17 trillion-dollar trade
volume targeted by our country in 2023, it needed short-term
efficiency-enhancing investments and long-term serious infrastructure
investments.

Kaynakça

  • Altınok, S. (2001). Türkiye’de ulaştırma politikaları, karayolları ve demiryollarının mukayesesi. SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(2), 73-87.
  • Anderson, F. N. G., Elger, T. (2012). Swedish freight demand: short, medium, and long- term elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 46(1), 79-97.
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  • Gargett, D., Aroia, L. (1990). Freight flows in Australian transport corridors. Occasional paper. Publication of: Australian Government Publishing Service, (98).
  • Chang, M. (2014). Principles of scientific methods. CRC Press.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
  • Cook, W. D., Tone, K., Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1-4.
  • Çekerol, G., Nalçakan, M. (2011). Lojistik sektörü içerisinde türkiye demiryolu yurtiçi yük taşıma talebinin ridge regresyonla analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 31(2), 321-344.
  • Eurostat (2017). Milyar ton-km ve toplam demiryolu uzunluğu. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/statistics/pocketbook-2017_en.
  • İnan, M., Demir, M. (2017). Demiryolu ulaşımı ve Türkiye’de hızlı tren yatırımlarının etkileri: Eskişehir-Konya örneği. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 99-120.
  • Kabasakal, A., Solak, A. O. (2008). Evrensel hizmet yükümlülüğünün uygulanması ve Türk demiryolu sektörü. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(2), 137-146
  • Kabasakal, A., Solak, A. O. (2009). Demiryolu sektörünün rekabete açılması. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25, 27-34.
  • Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatiksel analizler. Nobel Akademik, Ankara.
  • Kasapoğlu, L., Cerit, A. G. (2011). Türkiye'de intermodal konteyner taşımacılığında demiryolu ulaştırma potansiyelinin analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 59-72.
  • Kaynak, M. (2002). Yeni demiryolu çağı yüksek hızlı trenler ve Türkiye. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 13, (42-43), 23-53.
  • Productivity Commission (2006). Road and rail freight infrastructure pricing. Inquiry Report 41. Productivity Commission, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Rao, P. S. (1978). Forecasting the demand for railway freight services. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 12, 7–26.
  • Saatçioğlu, C., Çankırı Kolbaşı, N. (2012). Türkiye lojistik sektöründe denizyolu-demiryolu entegrasyon sürecinin incelenmesi, Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 1(2), 1-25
  • Song, M., Zhang, G., Zeng, W., Liu, J., Fang, K. (2016). Railway transportation and environmental efficiency in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 488-498.
  • Tuna, O. (2011). Türkiye için lojistik ve denizcilik stratejileri: uluslararası ve bölgesel belirleyiciler. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3 (2).
  • TÜİK (2017). Demiryoluyla taşınan yük. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=1584 yük.
  • World Bank (2017a). Toplam ihracat. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.MRCH.CD.WT.
  • World Bank (2017b). Toplam ithalat. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.VAL.MRCH.CD.WT.
  • World Bank (2017c). GSYİH. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.
  • World Bank (2017d). Ürün ihracatı. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.CD.
  • World Bank (2017e). Ürün ithalatı. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.CD.
  • World Bank (2017f). Nüfus. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.
  • World Bank (2017g). Ülke alanı. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.TOTL.K2.
  • Woroniuk, C., Marinov, M., Zunder, T., Mortimer, P. (2013). Time series analysis of rail freight services by the private sector in Europe. Transport Policy, 25, 81-93.
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 182 - 193, 30.09.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Altınok, S. (2001). Türkiye’de ulaştırma politikaları, karayolları ve demiryollarının mukayesesi. SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(2), 73-87.
  • Anderson, F. N. G., Elger, T. (2012). Swedish freight demand: short, medium, and long- term elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 46(1), 79-97.
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  • Gargett, D., Aroia, L. (1990). Freight flows in Australian transport corridors. Occasional paper. Publication of: Australian Government Publishing Service, (98).
  • Chang, M. (2014). Principles of scientific methods. CRC Press.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
  • Cook, W. D., Tone, K., Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1-4.
  • Çekerol, G., Nalçakan, M. (2011). Lojistik sektörü içerisinde türkiye demiryolu yurtiçi yük taşıma talebinin ridge regresyonla analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 31(2), 321-344.
  • Eurostat (2017). Milyar ton-km ve toplam demiryolu uzunluğu. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/statistics/pocketbook-2017_en.
  • İnan, M., Demir, M. (2017). Demiryolu ulaşımı ve Türkiye’de hızlı tren yatırımlarının etkileri: Eskişehir-Konya örneği. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 99-120.
  • Kabasakal, A., Solak, A. O. (2008). Evrensel hizmet yükümlülüğünün uygulanması ve Türk demiryolu sektörü. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(2), 137-146
  • Kabasakal, A., Solak, A. O. (2009). Demiryolu sektörünün rekabete açılması. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25, 27-34.
  • Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatiksel analizler. Nobel Akademik, Ankara.
  • Kasapoğlu, L., Cerit, A. G. (2011). Türkiye'de intermodal konteyner taşımacılığında demiryolu ulaştırma potansiyelinin analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 59-72.
  • Kaynak, M. (2002). Yeni demiryolu çağı yüksek hızlı trenler ve Türkiye. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 13, (42-43), 23-53.
  • Productivity Commission (2006). Road and rail freight infrastructure pricing. Inquiry Report 41. Productivity Commission, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Rao, P. S. (1978). Forecasting the demand for railway freight services. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 12, 7–26.
  • Saatçioğlu, C., Çankırı Kolbaşı, N. (2012). Türkiye lojistik sektöründe denizyolu-demiryolu entegrasyon sürecinin incelenmesi, Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 1(2), 1-25
  • Song, M., Zhang, G., Zeng, W., Liu, J., Fang, K. (2016). Railway transportation and environmental efficiency in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 488-498.
  • Tuna, O. (2011). Türkiye için lojistik ve denizcilik stratejileri: uluslararası ve bölgesel belirleyiciler. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3 (2).
  • TÜİK (2017). Demiryoluyla taşınan yük. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=1584 yük.
  • World Bank (2017a). Toplam ihracat. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.MRCH.CD.WT.
  • World Bank (2017b). Toplam ithalat. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.VAL.MRCH.CD.WT.
  • World Bank (2017c). GSYİH. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.
  • World Bank (2017d). Ürün ihracatı. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.CD.
  • World Bank (2017e). Ürün ithalatı. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.CD.
  • World Bank (2017f). Nüfus. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.
  • World Bank (2017g). Ülke alanı. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.TOTL.K2.
  • Woroniuk, C., Marinov, M., Zunder, T., Mortimer, P. (2013). Time series analysis of rail freight services by the private sector in Europe. Transport Policy, 25, 81-93.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Abdullah Acik 0000-0003-4542-9831

Sadik Ozlen Baser 0000-0001-6632-2617

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Acik, A., & Baser, S. O. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 5(3), 182-193.

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.