TEAM PERCEPTION AND LEARNING ORIENTATION AS THE PREDICTORS OF R&D PERFORMANCE

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 203 - 217, 31.12.2021

Coskun Cebecı Rifat Kamasak Tugce Ezgi Soyaltın

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1528

Öz

Purpose- The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of team perception and learning orientation on firms’ research and
development performance.
Methodology- The data which were collected by a survey from 407 people working in the R&D departments of firms which operate across
various industries in Turkey, were analysed. While the theoretical adequacy of the relationships between variables were tested by
confirmatory factor analysis, the impact of team perception and learning orientation on R&D performance was examined by regression
analysis.
Findings- The study found significant and positive impact of both team perception and learning orientation on firms’ R&D performance.
When team perception and learning orientation were regressed on R&D performance together, a stronger link between dependent variables
and R&D performance was observed.
Conclusion- Strong support from top management for team-based work and encouragement for continuous learning through HR policies,
empowerment and job enlargement were suggested. The study provided empirical evidence about the predictors of R&D and innovation
performance which is scant in the extant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Team perception, learning orientation, R&D performance, confirmatory factor analysis, regression analysis

AR-GE PERFORMANS ÖNCÜLLERI OLARAK TAKIM ALGISI VE ÖĞRENME YÖNELİMİ

Öz

Amaç- Bu araştırmanın amacı takım algısı ve öğrenme yöneliminin araştırma ve geliştirme (Ar-Ge) faaliyetlerinin performansına olan
etkilerinin incelenmesidir.
Yöntem- Türkiye’de Ar-Ge merkezi belgesine sahip farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde çalışan 407 kişiden anket yöntemi ile veri
toplanmıştır. Takım algısı ve öğrenme yönelimi boyutlarının Ar-Ge performans değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkilerin teorik olarak uygunluğu
doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile incelenirken, değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi için regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular- Takım algısı ve öğrenme yönelimi ile Ar-Ge proje performansı arasında ayrı ayrı istatistiki olarak anlamlı ve pozitif ilişkiler
bulunurken, öğrenme yönelimi ve takım algısının birlikte hareket etmesi halinde Ar-Ge proje başarısındaki değişime ait açıklayıcılığın arttığı
görülmüştür.
Sonuç- İşletmelerin özellikle yönetici ve liderler vasıtası ile takım çalışmasını desteklemeleri yanında yetkilendirme, daha geniş iş yapıları ve
iş tasarımları yoluyla çalışanlarını sürekli öğrenmeye teşvik etmeleri, Ar-Ge proje performansının arttırılması yolunda önemli uygulamalar
olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Literatürde takım etkinliği ve bireylerin öğrenme yönelimleri gibi faktörlerin Ar-Ge performansına olan
etkilerinden bahsedilirken bu ilişkiyi ölçen ampirik araştırma sayısının azlığı dikkat çekmektedir. Araştırma bulgularının bu eksikliğin
giderilmesine katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Takım algısı, öğrenme yönelimi, Ar-Ge performansı, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, regresyon analizi

Kaynakça

• Abankwa, D.A., Li, R.Y.M., Rowlinson, S., Li, Y. (2021). Exploring Individual Adaptability as a Prerequisite for Adjusting to Technological Changes in Construction, In: Ahmed S.M., Hampton P., Azhar S., D. Saul A. (eds) Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_99.
• Alegre, J., Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test. Technovation, 28(6), 315–326.
• Andersén, J., Torbjörn, L. (2021). Resource Orchestration for Team-Based Innovation: A Case Study of the Interplay Between Teams, Customers and Top Management. R&D Management, 51(1), 147–160.
• Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W. (1991). Predicting The Performance of Measures in A Confirmatory Factor Analysis With A Pretest Assessment of Their Substantive Validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 732–740.
• Anzengruber, J., Goetz, M.A., Nold, H., Woelfle, M. (2017). Effectiveness of Managerial Capabilities at Different Hierarchical Levels. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 134–148.
• Atılgan, H., Demirtaş, H., Aksu, M.B., Silman, F. (2010). İlköğretim Okul Yöneticilerine Yönelik Takım Algısı Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 11(2), 20–44.
• Aydın, S. (2015). Satışta Kritik Başarı Faktörlerinin Satış Performansı Üzerindeki Etkilerinde Otantik Liderlik ve Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Rolünü Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Uygulama (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M. (1999). The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411–427.
• Barrachina, M.B., Herrero, I. (2018). Team Creative Environment as a Mediator Between CWX and R&D Team Performance and Moderating Boundary Conditions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(2), 311–323
• Boccia, M., Cseh, M. (2021). Full-Service Restaurants As Learning Organizations: A Multiple-Site Case Study. The Learning Organization. DOI: 10.1108/TLO-04-2020-005.
• Bulutlar, F., Kamaşak, R. (2008). The Relationship between Organizational Communication and Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Study of Blue Collar Workers. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(4), 129–142.
• Buvik, M.P., Tvedt, S.D. (2017). The Influence of Project Commitment and Team Commitment on the Relationship between Trust and Knowledge Sharing in Project Teams. Project Management Journal, 48(2), 5–21.
• Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T., Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524.
• Cebeci, C., Kamaşak, R. (2021). Sosyal Zeka ve İçsel Motivasyonun Ar-Ge Performansına Etkisi: Ar-Ge Merkezleri Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 47–66.
• Chatenier, E.D., Verstegen, J.A., Biemans, H.J., Mulder, M., Omta, O.S.F. (2010). Identification of Competencies For Professionals in Open Innovation Teams. R&D Management, 40(3), 271 280.
• Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO Approach, 302, 60–62.
• Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101–115.
• Daugherty, M.K. (2013). The Prospect of an "A" in STEM Education”, Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 10–15.
• Deutsch, M. (2011). Cooperation and Competition. P. Coleman (Ed.), Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice, New York, NY: Springer.
• Drach-Zahavy, A., Somech, A. (2001). Understanding Team Innovation: The Role of Team Processes and Structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111–123.
• Easterby-Smith, M., Prieto, I.M. (2008). Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: An Integrative Role For Learning? British Journal of Management, 19(3), 235–249.
• Es-Sajjade, A., Wilkins, T. (2017). Design, Perception and Behavior in the Innovation Era: Revisiting the Concept of Interdependence. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 1–12.
• Facebook. (2018). Get that job at 22 Mart. https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/get-that-job-atfacebook/10150964382448920 adresinden erişildi.
• Haynes, B. (2020). Can Creativity Be Taught. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 34–44.
• Hirst, G. (1999). The Relationship Between Team Communication and R&D Project Performance: A Five Factor Model of Team Communication (Doctoral dissertation), The Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne.
• Johnson, D.W., Johnson, F.P. (1997). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Kamaşak, R. (2010). Workplace Isolation and Job Performance: A Study on Carpet Weaving Women. China-USA Business Review, 9(8), 26– 36.
• Kamaşak, R., Bulutlar, F. (2010). The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Innovation. European Business Review, 22(3), 306–317.
• Kamaşak, R. (2012). Knowledge Management Practice Assessment and The Relationship Between Knowledge Management Practices and Organizational Strategy Development: Empirical Evidence From Turkey, In: Hou, H-T. (ed.), New Research on Knowledge Management Applications and Lessons Learned (pp. 35–46). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publications.
• Kamaşak, R. (2015). Creation of firm performance through resource orchestration: The case of Ülker. Competitiveness Review, 25(2), 179– 204.
• Kamaşak, R. (2016). Determinants of Innovation Performance: A Resource-Based Study. World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 28–30 May, Istanbul, Turkey, (Elsevier Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195C, 1330–1337).
• Kamaşak, R., (2017). The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(2), 252–275.
• Kamaşak, R., Yavuz, M., Altuntaş, G. (2016). Is The Relationship Between Innovation Performance and Knowledge Management Contingent on Environmental Dynamism and Learning Capability? Evidence From A High Turbulent Market. Business Research, 9(2), 229–253.
• Kamaşak, R., Yücelen, M. (2009). A qualitative study of investigating organizational learning barriers. 2nd Management and Economy Congress, 24–25 September, Best Paper Award, Izmir, Turkey, (Proceedings [4], pp. 109–122).
• Kamaşak, R., Yücelen, M., (2010). The relationship between knowledge assets and organizational strategy development. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(2), 65–72.
• Kamaşak, R., Yozgat, U., Yavuz, M. (2017a). Knowledge Process Capabilities and Innovation: Testing the Moderating Effects of Environmental Dynamism and Strategic Flexibility. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(3), 356–368.
• Kamaşak, R., Yavuz, M., Özturk, T.Y. (2017b). Reducing Risk Through Strategic Flexibility And Implementation Leadership in High-Velocity Markets, In: Hacioglu, U., Dincer, H. and Alayoglu, N. (eds.), Global Business Strategies in Crisis: Strategic Thinking and Development (pp. 273–286). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing
• Kamaşak, R., Özbilgin, M.F., Küçükaltan, B., Yavuz, M. (2020). Regendering of Dynamic Managerial Capabilities in The Context of Binary Perspectives on Gender Diversity. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(1), 19–36.
• Khedhaouria, A., Montani, F., Taurik, R. (2017). Time Pressure and Team Member Creativity Within R&D Projects: The Role of Learning Orientation and Knowledge Sourcing. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 942–954.
• Kim, K., Watkins, K., Lu, Z. (2017). The Impact of A Learning Organization on Performance: Focusing on Knowledge Performance and Financial Performance. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(2), 177–193.
• Kock, A., Gemünden, H.G. (2021). How Entrepreneurial Orientation Can Leverage Innovation Project Portfolio Management? R&D Management, 51(1), 40–56.
• Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2020). Learning Orientation and Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Operations Strategy and Supply Chain Integration. Supply Chain Management, 25(4), 457–474.
• Leroy, H., Buengeler, C., Veestraeten, M., Shemla, M., Hoever, I.J. (2021). Fostering Team Creativity Through Team-Focused Inclusion: The
• Role of Leader Harvesting the Benefits of Diversity and Cultivating Value-In-Diversity Beliefs. Group & Organization Management, 0(0), 1-42. DOI: 10.1177/10596011211009683.
• Liu, Y., Kelle, R.T., Shih, H.A. (2011). The Impact of Team-Member Exchange, Differentiation, Team Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing on R&D Project Team Performance. R&D Management, 41(3), 274–287.
• Mak, C., Hong, J. (2020). Creating Learning Organization 2.0: A Contextualized and Multi-Stakeholder Approach. The Learning Organization, 27(3), 235–248.
• Marquardt, M.J. (2011). Building the Learning Organization: Achieving Strategic Advantage through a Commitment to Learning, 3rd ed., Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Boston, MA.
• Marsh, H.W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A.J.S., Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA And EFA: Application to Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching”, Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–447.
• McCormick, S., Kerin, M. (2021). Putting the A in STEAM: Arts Education in Junior Cycle, In: Murchan D., Johnston K. (eds) Curriculum Change within Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50707-7_8.
• Mueller, F., Procter, S., Buchanan, D. (2000). Teamworking in its Context(s): Antecedents, Nature and Dimensions. Human Relations, 53(11), 1387–1424.
• Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W. (2006). How The Group Affects The Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186–213.
• Ogunfowora, B., Stackhouse, M., Maerz, A., Varty, C., Hwang, C., Choi, J. (2021). The Impact of Team Moral Disengagement Composition on Team Performance: The Roles of Team Cooperation, Team Interpersonal Deviance, and Collective Extraversion. Journal of Business Psychology, 36(3), 479–494.
• Ogungbamila, B., Ogungbamila, A., Agboola, A.G. (2010). Effects of Team Size and Work Team Perception on Workplace Commitment: Evidence From 23 Production Teams. Small Group Research, 41(6), 725–745.
• On-site Interviews. (2018, 22 Mart). https://careers.google.com/how-we-hire/interview/#onsite-interviews adresinden erişildi.
• Özsoy, İ. (2012). Örgüt İklimi, Öz Liderlik ve İş Tatmininin Ar-Ge Performansına Etkisi: Savunma Sanayiinde Bir Araştırma (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Pınar, İ., Kamaşak, R., Bulutlar, F. (2010). Dış Çevre ve Bireysel Güç Odaklı Strateji Geliştirme Süreçlerinin Araştırmacı ve Fırsatçı Yenilikçilik Üzerindeki Etkisi. Öneri Dergisi, 9(33), 11-16.
• Pirola-Merlo, A. (2010). Agile Innovation: The Role of Team Climate In Rapid Research and Development. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 1075–1084.
• Porter, T.W., Lilly, B.S. (1996). The Effects of Conflict, Trust, and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), 361–376.
• Purna Sudhakar, G., Farooq, A., Patnaik, S. (2011). Soft Factors Affecting The Performance of Software Development Teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 17(3/4), 187–205.
• Redmond, M.R., Mumford, M.D., Teach, R. (1993). Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151.
• Romeike, P.D., Nienaber, A.M., Schewe, G. (2016). How Differences in Perceptions of Own and Team Performance Impact Trust and Job Satisfaction in Virtual Teams. Human Performance, 29(4), 291–309.
• Ruch, W., Gander, F., Platt, T., Hofmann, J. (2018). Team Roles: Their Relationships to Character Strengths and Job Satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 190–199.
• Sabahi, S., Parast, M. (2020). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Orientation on Project Performance: A Machine Learning Approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 1–14.
• Senge, P.M. (1996). Leading Learning Organizations. Training & Development, 50(12), 35–45
• Seriwatana, P., Charoensukmongkol, P. (2020). Cultural Intelligence and Relationship Quality in The Cabin Crew Team: The Perception of
• Members Belonging to Cultural Minority Groups. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism. DOI: 10.1080/15332845.2020.1821431.
• Sheng, Z., Watkins, S., Yoon, S.W., Kim, J. (2021). Examining Schools As Learning Organizations: An Integrative Approach. The Learning Organization. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2020-0050.
• Shieng, M. L., Chien, S. (2016). Rethinking Organizational Learning Orientation on Radical and Incremental Innovation in High-Tech Firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2302–2308.
• Silver, L.S., Dwyer, S., Alford, B. (2006). Learning and Performance Goal Orientation of Salespeople Revisited: The Role of PerformanceApproach and Performance-Avoidance Orientations. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 26(1), 27–38.
• Sinkula, J., Baker, W., Noordewier, T. (1997). A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305–318.
• Spender, J.C. (2008). Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Management Learning, 39(2), 159–176.
• Sujan, H., Weitz, B.A., Kumar, N. (1994). Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39–52.
• Sukoco, B.M., Lestari, Y.D., Susanto, E., Nasution, R.A., Usman, I. (2021). Middle Manager Capabilities and Organisational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Organisational Capacity For Change. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0364.
• Thamhain, H.J. (2004). Linkages of Project Environment to Performance: Lessons For Team Leadership. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 533–544.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, TÜİK (2020). Araştırma-Geliştirme Faaliyetleri Araştırması, 2019. https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=33676
• Ünlü, H, Çetin, A. (2015). The Impact of Learning Processes on Radical Innovation in Less Successful Innovator Countries: Turkey, Macedonia, Slovenia, and Serbia. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(2), 123–146.
• Wahyono, B.H. (2021). The Relationships Between Market Orientation, Learning Orientation, Financial Literacy, on The Knowledge Competence, Innovation, and Performance of Small and Medium Textile Industries in Java and Bali. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(1), 39–46.
• Wei, Y., Nan, H., Wei, G. (2020). The Impact of Employee Welfare on Innovation Performance: Evidence From China's Manufacturing
• Corporations. International Journal of Production Economics, 228(1), 1–20.
• Wong, A., Tjosvold, D., Liu, C. (2009). Innovation by Teams in Shanghai, China: Cooperative Goals for Group Confidence and Persistence. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 1045–3172.
• Yang Y., Kuria, G.N., Gu, D.X. (2020). Mediating Role of Trust Between Leader Communication Style and Subordinate’s Work Outcomes in Project Teams. Engineering Management Journal, 32(3), 152–165.
• Yesildal E., Kamasak, R. (2021). The Impact of Knowledge Process Capabilities on Innovation Performance: An Empirical Research on R&D Centers. Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM), 8(4), 291–299.
• Yıldız, H.E., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., Richtnér, A. (2021). Individual and Contextual Determinants of Innovation Performance: A Micro-Foundations Perspective. Technovation, 99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102130.
• Yun, Y.J., Lee, K.J. (2017). Social Skills as a Moderator Between R&D Personnel’s Knowledge Sharing and Job Performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(5), 387–400
• Zehir, C., Özşahin, M. (2008). Takım Yönetimi ve Takım Etkinliğini Belirleyen Faktörler: Savunma Sanayinde Ar-Ge Yapan Takımlar Üzerinde Bir Saha Araştırması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(2), 266–279.
• Zhao, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, X. (2013). Organizational Unlearning and Organizational Relearning: A Dynamic Process of Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 902–912