Effectiveness of Flag State Control: Impact of Inspection Frequency and Number of Inspector

Abstract

Flag State Control (FSC) plays a critical role in ensuring maritime safety and preventing environmental pollution, serving as the first line of defense against substandard ships, while Port State Control (PSC) acts as a secondary safeguard. Therefore, effective FSC implementation is essential for ship inspections. This study investigates the impact of two key factors - inspection frequency and the number of inspectors - on FSC effectiveness. Using a factorial ANOVA, the analysis is based on data from 174 Turkish-flagged vessels inspected under the Paris Momerandum of Understanding (MoU) framework between 2021 and 2024. The findings indicate that both factors, as well as their interaction, significantly affect FSC effectiveness. These results emphasize the need for optimizing inspection schedules and ensuring sufficient inspector allocation to enhance flag state performance. The study provides valuable insights for maritime stakeholders in improving FSC practices to strengthen regulatory enforcement and maritime safety.

Keywords

• Flag State Control
• Port State Control
• Ship Inspection Effectiveness
• Factorial ANOVA

BAYRAK DEVLETİ DENETİM ETKİNLİĞİ: DENETİM SIKLIĞI VE DENETİM UZMANI SAYISININ ETKİSİ

Abstract

Bayrak Devleti Denetimi (FSC), deniz emniyetinin sağlanması ve çevre kirliliğinin önlenmesinde kritik bir rol oynayarak standart altı gemilere karşı ilk savunma hattı işlevi görürken, Liman Devleti Denetimi (PSC) ise ikincil bir emniyet mekanizması olarak görev yapmaktadır. Bu nedenle, etkin bayrak devleti denetimi uygulamaları gemi denetimleri açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışma, bayrak devleti denetimi etkinliği üzerinde iki temel faktör olan denetim periyodu ve denetime katılan denetim uzmanı sayısının etkisini incelemektedir. Faktöriyel ANOVA yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan analiz, 2021-2024 yılları arasında Paris Mutabakat Zabtı çerçevesinde denetlenen 174 Türk bayraklı gemilerden elde edilen verilere dayanmaktadır. Bulgular, her iki faktörün ve bu faktörlerin etkileşiminin bayrak devleti denetim etkinliği üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, denetim programlarının optimize edilmesi ve yeterli denetim uzmanı tahsisinin sağlanmasının bayrak devleti performansını artırmada kritik rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, mevzuat uygulamalarının güçlendirilmesi ve deniz emniyetinin artırılması amacıyla denizcilik sektöründeki paydaşlar için önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Bayrak Devleti Denetimi
• Liman Devleti Denetimi
• Gemi Denetim Etkinliği
• Faktöriyel ANOVA

References

1. Anderson, D. (2002). The effect of port state control on substandard shipping. Maritime Studies, 2002(125), 20-25.
2. Cariou, P., Mejia Jr, M. Q., & Wolff, F. C. (2008). On the effectiveness of port state control inspections. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(3), 491-503.
3. Cariou, P., Mejia Jr, M. Q., & Wolff, F. C. (2008). On the effectiveness of port state control inspections. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(3), 491-503.
4. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3. ed). Wiley. Corres, A. J. E., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Flag state performance: An empirical analysis. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 7, 241-261.
5. Demirci, S. M. E., & Cicek, K. (2023). Intelligent ship inspection analytics: Ship deficiency data mining for port state control. Ocean Engineering, 278, 114232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114232
6. Elvestad, C., & Kvalvik, I. (2015). Implementing the EU-IUU Regulation: Enhancing Flag State Performance Through Trade Measures. Ocean Development & International Law, 46(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2015.1054745
7. Emecen Kara, E. G. (2022). Determination of maritime safety performance of flag states based on the Port State Control inspections using TOPSIS. Marine Policy, 143, 105156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2022.105156
8. Fan, L., Zheng ,Lan, & and Luo, M. (2022). Effectiveness of port state control inspection using Bayesian network modelling. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1841913

9. Graziano, A., Cariou, P., Wolff, F. C., Mejia, M. Q., & Schröder-Hinrichs, J. U. (2018). Port state control inspections in the European Union: Do inspector’s number and background matter? Marine Policy, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.031 Graziano, A., Mejia, M. Q., & Schröder-Hinrichs, J. U. (2018). Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control. Transport Policy, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.016
10. Hair, J. F., W.C., B., B.J., B., & R.E., A. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
11. Knapp, S., & Van De Velden, M. (2011). Global ship risk profiles: Safety and the marine environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(8), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.08.001
12. Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. M., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of Student’s t-test, Analysis of Variance, and Covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19
13. Perepelkin, M., Knapp, S., Perepelkin, G., & de Pooter, M. (2010). An improved methodology to measure flag performance for the shipping industry. Marine Policy, 34(3), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2009.09.002
14. Ravira, F. J., & Piniella, F. (2016). Evaluating the impact of PSC inspectors’ professional profile: A case study of the Spanish Maritime Administration. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-015-0096-y
15. Sari, L. I., & Sutopo, D. (2018). The Effectiveness of Vocabulary Self-Collection and Word Mapping Strategies for Teaching Vocabulary to Maritime Cadets With High and Low Metacognitive Awareness. English Education Journal, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v8i1.22127
16. Tsou, M. C. (2018). Big data analysis of port state control ship detention database. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2018.1505029
17. UAB. (n.d.). Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://denizcilikistatistikleri.uab.gov.tr/ UAB. (2017). Uluslararası Sefer Yapan Gemilerde DPA Görevlendirilmesi. https://denizcilik.uab.gov.tr/uploads/pages/talimatlar/dpa-gorevlendirme-talimati-3-aylik-on-sorvey-araligi-icin-03-10-2017.pdf
18. Yan, R., Wang, S., Cao, J., & Sun, D. (2021). Shipping Domain Knowledge Informed Prediction and Optimization in Port State Control. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 149, 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.05.003
19. Yan, R., Wang, S., & Fagerholt, K. (2020). A semi-“smart predict then optimize” (semi-SPO) method for efficient ship inspection. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.09.014
20. Yu, Y., Zhao, Y., & Chang, Y. C. (2018). Challenges to the primary jurisdiction of flag states over ships. Ocean Development and International Law, 49(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2017.1370919
21. Yuan, C.-C., Chung, W.-H., Cai, C., & Sung, S.-T. (2020). Application of Statistical Process Control on Port State Control. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100746
22. Zwinge, T. (2012). Duties of Flag States to Implement and Enforce International Standards and Regulations – And Measures to Counter Their Failure to Do So. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1682193