Kuru iğneleme ile ilgili Youtube videolarının kalitesinin ve geçerliliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: İnternetin yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte sosyal medya platformları bilgi kaynağı olarak sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Hastalar özellikle işlem öncesi YouTube videolarını izleyebilir ve kuru iğneleme hakkında bilgi toplayabilir. Bu kesitsel çalışma, kuru iğneleme ile ilgili videoların güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Materyal Metot: “Kuru iğneleme” anahtar kelimesi kullanılarak YouTube'da arama yapıldı. Videoların izlenme sayıları ve süreleri gibi özellikleri not edildi. Videoların güvenilirliği ve kalitesi DISCERN ve Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) skalaları ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 150 video tarandı ve 50 video hariç tutuldu: 30'u yinelenen, 10'u konu dışı, 5'i İngilizce dışında bir dildeydi ve 5'inde ses yoktu. Videoların çoğu hekim olmayan sağlık personeli (%42) ve doktorlar (%27) tarafından yüklenmişti. En yaygın video içeriği kuru iğneleme işlem uygulama yöntemiyle ilgiliydi (%53). JAMA ve DISCERN araçlarının ortalama puanları sırasıyla 1.9 ve 35.3 idi. Videoların yüzde %34’ü çok zayıf, %31'i zayıf, %18'i orta, %11'i iyi ve sadece %6'sı mükemmeldi. Sonuç: YouTube, tıbbi bilgilerin özgürce paylaşıldığı ve yaygınlaştırıldığı bir platformdur. Bu çalışmada, kuru iğneleme ile ilgili YouTube videolarının çoğunun düşük kalitede olduğunu bulduk. Kuru iğneleme ile ilgili tıbbi bilgilerin güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini artırmak için sağlık uzmanları ve akademik kurumların gelecekteki çabaları gereklidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kuru iğneleme
• YouTube videoları
• kalite
• güvenilirlik

Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Dry Needling Procedure

Abstract

Objectives: With the popularization of the Internet, social media platforms are used frequently as an information source. Patients can watch YouTube videos and gather information on dry needling especially before the procedure. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of videos on dry needling. Materials and Methods: A search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword “dry needling”. Features of videos, such as the number of views and duration of the videos, were noted. The reliability and quality of videos were assessed with the DISCERN and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Results: A total of 150 videos were screened and 50 videos were excluded: 30 were duplicates, 10 were off-topic, 5 were in a language other than English, and 5 had no audio. Most of the videos were uploaded by non-physician health personnel (42%) and physicians (27%). The most common video content was demonstration (53%) of dry needling. The mean scores of the JAMA and DISCERN tools were 1.9 and 35.3, respectively. Thirty-four percent of videos were very poor, 31% were poor, 18% were fair, 11% were good, and only 6% were excellent. Conclusion: YouTube is a platform where medical information is freely shared and widespread. In this study, we found that most of the YouTube videos on dry needling were of low quality. Future efforts by healthcare professionals and academic institutions are necessary to improve the reliability and quality of medical information on dry needling.

Keywords

• dry needling
• YouTube videos
• quality
• reliability

Kaynakça

1. 1. Dunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Flannagan S, Perreault T. Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines. Phys Ther Rev : PTR. Aug 2014;19(4):252-265. doi:10.1179/108331913x13844245102034
2. 2. Casanueva B, Rivas P, Rodero B, Quintial C, Llorca J, González-Gay MA. Short-term improvement following dry needle stimulation of tender points in fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int. Jun 2014;34(6):861-6. doi:10.1007/s00296-013-2759-3
3. 3. Berger AA, Liu Y, Mosel L, et al. Efficacy of Dry Needling and Acupuncture in the Treatment of Neck Pain. Anesth Pain Med. Apr 2021;11(2):e113627. doi:10.5812/aapm.113627
4. 4. Funk MF, Frisina-Deyo AJ. Dry needling for spine related disorders: a scoping review. Chiropr Man Therap. May 11 2020;28(1):23. doi:10.1186/s12998-020-00310-z
5. 5. Boyce D, Wempe H, Campbell C, et al. ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THERAPEUTIC DRY NEEDLING. Int J Sports Phys Ther. Feb 2020;15(1):103-113.
6. 6. Zengin O, Onder ME. Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound. Clin Rheumatol. Oct 2021;40(10):4243-4251. doi:10.1007/s10067-021-05793-6
7. 7. Onder ME, Zengin O. YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis. Rheumatol Int. Jul 2021;41(7):1321-1328. doi:10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7
8. 8. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. Dec 2016;49(12):1194-1200. doi:10.1111/iej.12575

9. 9. Chang MC, Park D. YouTube as a Source of Information on Epidural Steroid Injection. J Pain Res. 2021;14:1353-1357. doi:10.2147/jpr.s307506
10. 10. Derakhshan A, Lee L, Bhama P, Barbarite E, Shaye D. Assessing the educational quality of 'YouTube' videos for facelifts. Am J Otolaryngol. Mar-Apr 2019;40(2):156-159. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.01.001
11. 11. Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. Feb 2021;24(2):197-202. doi:10.1111/1756-185x.14043
12. 12. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.105
13. 13. Kaicker J, Borg Debono V, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC medicine. Oct 12 2010;8:59. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-59
14. 14. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. Jama. Apr 16 1997;277(15):1244-5.
15. 15. Kazancioglu HO, Tek M, Ezirganli S, Demirtas N. Does watching a video on third molar surgery increase patients' anxiety level? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. Mar 2015;119(3):272-7. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.10.012
16. 16. Ahmed KJ, Pilling JD, Ahmed K, Buchan J. Effect of a patient-information video on the preoperative anxiety levels of cataract surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. Apr 2019;45(4):475-479. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.11.011
17. 17. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, Sheridan SE, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc. Jan 2010;85(1):53-62. doi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0248
18. 18. Bagcier F, Yorulmaz E, Temel MH. YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Knee Osteoarthritis Exercises. Turk J Osteoporos. 2021;27(3)
19. 19. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Nov 15 2018;43(22):E1334-e1339. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002691
20. 20. Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears. Cureus. Feb 3 2020;12(2):e6852. doi:10.7759/cureus.6852
21. 21. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome? Oral Dis. Apr 2016;22(3):196-201. doi:10.1111/odi.12404
22. 22. Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. Oct 2016;40(10):1995-2002. doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3174-7