joeep JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy 2651-5318 Seyfettin ERDOĞAN Financial Markets and Institutions Finansal Piyasalar ve Kurumlar Seçili Risk Ve Belirsizlik Endeksleri İle Sektörel Hisse Senedi Getirileri Arasındaki Asimetrik İlişkinin İncelenmesi: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Ampirik Bir Analiz Examining the Asymmetric Relationship Between Selected Risk and Uncertainty Indices and Sectoral Stock Returns: An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-8638 Pala Fahrettin Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Kelkit Aydın Doğan Meslek Yüksek Okulu 12 30 2024 9 2 236 261 07 30 2024 11 05 2024 Copyright © 2016, JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy 2016 JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy

Çalışmanın amacı, ekonomik politika belirsizliği (EPU), jeopolitik risk (GPR) ve piyasa duyarlılığının (VIX) seçilmiş 5 OECD ülkesine (ABD, Fransa, İngiltere, İtalya ve İsveç) ait sektörel hisse senetleri üzerindeki asimetrik etkilerini araştırmaktır. Araştırmanın tasarımı ve metodolojik yaklaşımı parametrik Granger nedensellik testi ve parametrik olmayan kantil tabanlı tekniklere dayanmaktadır. Jeopolitik risk endeksi (GPR), ülke ekonomik politika belirsizliği (EPU) ve Chicago Board Options Exchange'in (CBOE) oynaklık endeksinin (VIX) yanı sıra ekonomik faaliyetin yedi sektörünü (sağlık, finans, teknoloji petrol ve gaz, endüstri, tüketici hizmetleri ve temel tüketim ürünleri) kapsayan aylık verilerini kullanıyoruz. Veri setimiz, Ocak 2012 ile Şubat 2024 tarihleri arasındaki dönemi kapsamaktadır. Verilerin analizinde Granger Nedensellik testi ve Panel Kantil Regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgularımız beş ana noktandan oluşmaktadır. Bunlardan birincisi, ekonomik politika belirsizliği, jeopolitik risk ve yatırımcı duyarlılığından seçili OECD ülkelerinin sektörel hisse senetlerine doğru nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu sonucuna varıyoruz. İkincisi ekonomik politika belirsizliği, jeopolitik risk ve yatırımcı duyarlılığının farklı çeyreklikler boyunca seçili OECD ülkelerine ait hisse senedi getirileri üzerinde genel olarak güçlü bir ön görü gücüne sahip olduğu sonucuna varıyoruz. Üçüncüsü seçilmiş OECD ülkelerine ait hisse senedi getirileri üzerinde en yüksek öngörü gücüne sahip değişkenin ekonomik politika belirsizliği (EPU) olduğu sonucuna varıyoruz. Dördüncüsü, özellikle ekonomik politika belirsizliğinin, seçili OECD ülkelerine ait sektörel hisse senedi getirileri üzerindeki etkisinin asimetrik olduğu sonucuna varıyoruz. Yine jeopolitik risk ve piyasa duyarlılığının ise belirli sektörel hisse senedi (teknoloji, petrol ve gaz) getirileri üzerindeki etkisinin asimetrik olduğu sonucuna varıyoruz. Çalışmanın orijinalliği, COVID-19, Rusya-Ukrayna ve İsrail-Filistin çatışmasının da dahil olduğu dünyada yaşanan küresel faktörlerin seçilmiş OECD ülkelerine ait sektörel bazda hisse senedi piyasasını nasıl etkilediğini ortaya koyuyor olmasıdır. Dolayısıyla bulgularımızın değeri, piyasa düzenlemesi ve portföy yönetimi için önemli çıkarımlar sağlamasında yatmaktadır.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty (EPU), geopolitical risk (GPR), and market sentiment (VIX) on sectoral stock returns in five selected OECD countries (USA, France, UK, Italy, and Sweden). The research design and methodological approach are based on the parametric Granger causality test and non-parametric quantile-based techniques. We use monthly data covering the Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR), the Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) for each country, and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility Index (VIX), as well as seven sectors of economic activity (healthcare, finance, technology, oil and gas, industrial, consumer services, and consumer staples. Our dataset covers the period from January 2012 to February 2024. Granger Causality test and Panel Quantile Regression analysis were used in the analysis of the data. Our findings consist of five main points. Firstly, we conclude that there is a causality relationship from economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and investor sentiment to sectoral stock returns of selected OECD countries. Secondly, we find that economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and investor sentiment generally have strong predictive power on the stock returns of selected OECD countries across different quantiles. Thirdly, we conclude that economic policy uncertainty (EPU) has the highest predictive power on stock returns among the selected OECD countries. Fourthly, we find that the effect of economic policy uncertainty on sectoral stock returns of selected OECD countries is asymmetric. Additionally, we conclude that geopolitical risk and market sentiment have asymmetric effects on the stock returns of specific sectors (technology, oil and gas). The originality of this study lies in its examination of how global factors, including COVID-19, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the Israel-Palestine conflict, impact sectoral stock markets in selected OECD countries. Thus, the value of our findings lies in providing significant implications for market regulation and portfolio management.

 : Jeopolitik Risk Ekonomik Politika Belirsizliği Yatırımcı Duyarlılığı Hisse Senedi Piyasası Panel Kantil Regresyon Geopolitical Risk Economic Policy Uncertainty Investor Sentiment Stock Market Panel Quantile Regression Abdelmalek, W. (2022). Investor sentiment, realized volatility and stock returns. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(5), 668-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-12-2020-0301 Acar, T.,ve Topdag, D. (2022). OECD ülkelerinde sefalet endeksi ve ekonomik kalkınma ekseninde sağlık harcamalarının belirleyicileri: toplamsal olma-yan sabit etkili panel kantil regresyon yaklaşımı. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 82, 267-286. Agyei, S.K., and Bossman, A. (2023). Investor sentiment and the interdependence structure of GIIPS stock market returns: A multiscale approach. Quantitative Finance and Economics (QFE), 7(1), 87-116. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2023005 Agoraki, M.E.K., Kouretas, G.P., and Laopodis, N.T. (2022). Geopolitical risks, uncertainty, and stock market performance. Economic and Political Studies, 10(3), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2022.2095749 Akyüz, HE (2023). Sabit etkiler modeli ve panel kantil regresyonunun karşılaştırılması: BRICS-T ülkelerinde yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin araştırılması. Eroğlu Sevinç, D. ve Yüce Akıncı, G. (editörler), Ekonomik ve Finansal Politikalar Üzerine Çalışmalar. Özgür Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub68.c88 Albaity, M., Saadaoui, Mallek, R., and Mustafa, H. (2023). Heterogeneity of investor sentiment, Jeoplitical risk and economic policy uncertainty: Do Islamic bank differ during COVID-19 pandemic? Internationel Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2021-1679. Alqahtani, A., Bouri, E., and Vo, X. V. (2020). Predictability of GCC stock returns: The role of geopolitical risk and crude oil returns. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.017 Amengual, D., and Xiu, D. (2018). Resolution of policy uncertainty and sudden declines in volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 203, 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.12.003 Behera, C., Priyadarsini, B.T., and Patnaik, D. (2024). Impact of jeopolitical risk and crude oil prices on stock return. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 27(0), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.59091/2460-9196.2158 Bossman, A., Gubareva, M., and Teplova, T. (2023a). EU sectoral stocks amid geopolitical risk, market sentiment, and crude oil implied volatility: An asymmetric analysis of the Russia–Ukraine tensions. Resources Policy, 82, 103515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103515 Bossman, A., Gubareva, M., and Teplova, T. (2023b). Asymmetric efects of geopolitical risk on majör currencies: Russia–Ukraine tensions. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103440. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.frl.2022.103440 Bossman, A., Gubareva, M., and Teplova, T. (2023c). Hedge and safe-haven attributes of faith-based stocks vis-à-vis cryptocurrency environmental attention: A multi-scale quantile regression analysis. Applied Economics, 56(31), 3698-3721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2208336 Bossman, A., Gubareva, M., and Teplova, T. (2023d). Economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, market sentiment, and regional stocks: asymmetric analyses of the EU sectors. Eurasian Economic Review, 13, 321-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00234-y Bouras, C., Christou, C., Gupta, R., and Suleman, T. (2018). Geopolitical risks, returns, and volatility in emerging stock markets: Evidence from a panel GARCH model. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(8), 1841-1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1507906 Chakraborty, M., and Subramaniam, S. (2020). Asymmetric relationship of investor sentiment with stock return and volatility: evidence from India. Review of Behavioral Finance, 12(4), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2019-0094 Chiang, T. C. (2021). Geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty and asset returns in Chinese financial markets., China Finance Review International, 11(4), 474-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-08-2020-0115 Dash, S. R., Maitra, D., Debata, B., and Mahakud, J. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market liquidity: Evidence from G7 countries. International Review of Finance, 21(2), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi. 12277 Dash, S. R., and Maitra, D. (2018). Does sentiment matter for stock returns? Evidence from Indian stock market using wavelet approach. Finance Research Letters, 26, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.11.008 Hoque, M.E., and Zaidi, M.A.S. (2020). Global and country-specific geopolitical risk uncertainty and stock return of fragile emerging economies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(3), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir. 2020 .05.0 01 Investing.com. (2024). CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) [Data set]. (Accessed date: 15.06.2024), https://www.investing.com/ Istiak, K., and Alam, M.R. (2020). US economic policy uncertainty spillover on the stock markets of the GCC countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-11-2018-0388 Jung, S., Lee, J., and Lee, S. (2021). The impact of geopolitical risk on stock returns: Evidence from inter-Korea geopolitics. (MPRA Paper No. 108006). University Library of Munich, Germany. Kannadhasan, M., and Das, D. (2020). Do Asian emerging stock markets react to international economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk alike? A quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.024 Karacaer Ulusoy, M., and Pirgaip, B. (2019). The causal relationship between economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23 (Özel Sayı) , 2239-2251. Karaömer, Y.,and Guzel, A.E. (2024). Effect of economic policy uncertainty on stock returns: Analysing the moderating role of government size. Politická ekonomie, 72(1), 50-72. https://doi.org./10.18267/j.polek.1407 Klement, J. (2021).Geo-Economics: The interplay between geopolitics, economics, and investments. CFA Insttitute Research Foundation. ISBN 978-1-952927-06-5. (Accessed date: 01.07.2024), https://www.cfainstitute.org/-media/documents/book/rf-publication/2021/geo-economics-full.pdf Kundu, S., and Paul, A. (2022). Effect of economic policy uncertainty on stock market return and volatility under heterogeneous market characteristics. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 597-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.047. Li, X.lin, Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., and Chang, T. (2016). The causal relationship between economic policy uncertainty and stock returns in China and India: Evidence from a bootstrap rolling window approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(3), 674-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2014.998564 Ma, Y., Wang, Z., and He, F. (2022). How do economic policy uncertainties affect stock market volatility? Evidence from G7 countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 2303-2325. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2274 Matteo Iacoviello. (2024).Country-Sipecific geopolitical risk index. (Accessed date: 03.06.2024), https://www.matteoiacoviello.com/gpr.htm Mensi, W., Gubareva, M., Ko, H.U., Vo, X. V., and Kang, S. H. (2023.,“Tail spillover efects between cryptocurrencies and uncertainty in the gold, oil, and stock markets. Financial Innovation, 9, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00498-y Meriç, M., ve Çağlar, A.E. (2023). Eviews ve Gauss Uygulamalı Zaman Serileri Analizi. Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı, Detay Yayıncılık: Ankara. Naeem, M. A., Farid, S., Nor, S. M., and Shahzad, S. J. H. (2021). Spillover and drivers of uncertainty among oil and commodity markets. Mathematics, 9(4), 441, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040441 Naik, P.K., and Padhi, P. (2016). Investor sentiment, stock market returns and volatility: evidence from National Stock Exchange of India. International Journal of Management Practice, 9(3), 213-237. Saka Ilgın, K. (2022). Ulusal ekonomik politika belirsizliği ile borsa endeksleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Seçilmiş Avrupa ülkeleri için ampirik bir analiz. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 9(2), 455-474. Salisu, A. A., Lasisi, L., and Tchankam, J. P. (2021). Historical geopolitical risk and the behaviour of stock returns in advanced economies. The European Journal of Finance, 28(9), 889-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1968467 Shen, L., and Hong, Y. (2023). Can jeopolitical risks excite Germany economic plicy uncertainty: Rethinking in the context of the Russia- Ukraine conflict. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103420 Simran, and Sharma, A.K. (2024). Asymmetric nexus between economic policy uncertainty and the Indian stock market: Evidence using NARDL approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, 93(C), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.11.006 Şahin, E.E., and Arslan, H. (2021). An analysis of the effects of geopolitical risks on stock returns and exchange rates using a nonparametric method. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 89, 237-250. Doi: 10.25095/mufad.852174/ Qadan, M., Kliger, D., and Chen, N. (2019). Idiosyncratic volatility, the VIX and stock returns. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.06.003 Policyuncertainty.com. (2024). Economic Policy Uncertainty [Data set]. (Accessed date: 15.06.2024), https://policyuncertainty.com/ Umar, Z., Gubareva, M., and Sokolova, T. (2022a). Assessing the impact of media sentiment on the returns of sukuks during the Covid-19 crisis. Applied Economics. 55(12), 1371-1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2097187 Umar, Z., Gubareva, M., Teplova, T., and Alwahedi, W. (2022b). Oil price shocks and the term structure of the US yield curve: A time-frequency analysis of spillovers and risk transmission. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04786-1 Wu, T.P., Liu, S.B., and Hsueh, S.J. (2016). The causal relationship between economic policy uncertainty and stock market: A panel data analysis. International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, 30(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2015.1136668 Xiao, J., Zhou, H., Wen, F., and Wen, F. (2018). Asymmetric impacts of oil price uncertainty on Chinese stock returns under diferent market conditions: Evidence from oil volatility index., Energy Economics, 74, 777-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.026 Xu, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Z., and Liang, C. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns: New evidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101525 Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2018). Panel zaman serileri analizi. Stata uygulamalı. (2. Baskı), Beta Yayınları: İstanbul. Zhang, Y., He, j., He., M., and Li, S. (2023). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility: A global perspective. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103620 Yuan, D., Li, S., Li, R., and Zhang, F. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty, oil and stock markets in BRIC: Evidence from quantiles analysis. Energy Economics, 110, 105972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105972