Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 0 - 0, 29.06.2016

Faruk Kaya İbrahim Koçak Ali Aydın Hakan Baybora Hacı Koç Salih Bozkurt

Öz

Amaç: Plusoptix S08 cihazının, refraktif ambliyopiye yol açabilecek, risk faktörlerinin tespiti açısından değerlendirmek.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Prospektif karşılaştırmalı çalışmamıza 2 ve 12 yaşları arasındaki 97 çocuk hastamızı dahil ettik. Plusoptix S08 ve Topcon otorefraktometre cihazları
arasındaki farklar, sensitivite, spesivite, pozitif prediktif değer, negatif prediktif değer, yanlış negatif sonuç, yanlış pozitif sonuç açısından; student-t
korelasyon testi kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı. P<0.05 bulunduğunda fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi. Plusoptix S08 ve Topcon otorefraktometreden
elde edilen refraktif sonuçlar; bütün hastalar, 2-5 yaş aralığı ve 5-12 yaş aralığındaki hastalar açısından değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Yapılan tam oftalmolojik muayene sonucunda 25 hastada (%26) ambliyopiye sebep olabilecek refraktif kusur tespit edildi. Plusoptix cihazının; ambliyopiye
yol açan refraktif risk faktörlerini tespit etmede sensitivitesi %64, spesivitesi %93, pozitif prediktif değeri %76, negatif prediktif değeri %88
olarak tespit edildi. Yanlış negatif sonuç %9, yanlış pozitif sonuç %5 olarak bulundu. Sferik (p=0,0001) ve silindirik (P=0,005) değerleri açısından
plusoptix S08 ve Topcon otorefraktometre arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark tespit edilirken; sferik ekivalan açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı
fark tespit edilmedi (p=1.6).
Sonuç: Plusoptix S08 kolay kullanılan, hızlı ve özellikle okul öncesi çocuklarda refraktif kusur tespitinde iyi spesivite ve sensitiviteye sahip bir cihazdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Plusoptix S08, refraktif ambliyopi

Kaynakça

• C Williams, K Northstone, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow et al. Amblyopia
• treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow up
• from randomised trial BMJ 2002;324:1549
• Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM ALSPAC Study Team.
• Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school
• entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study.Br J
• Ophthalmol. 2003;87(8):988-93.
• US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for visual impairment in
• children younger than age 5 years: recommendation statement. Ann Fam
• Med 2004;2:263-6
• Leman R, Armitage MD, Arnold RW. The Receiver-Operator Curve for Flip-
• Card Surround HOTV in Younger School Children: Validation of a Simple
• Flip Card for School Acuity Testing. Am Orthopt J. 2005;5(5):128-35. doi:
• 3368/aoj.55.1.128.
• Salcido AA, Bradley J, Donahue SP. Predictive value of photoscreening and
• traditional screening of preschool children. JAAPOS. 2005;9(2):114-20.
• Arnold RW, Armitage MD, Gionet EG, Balinger A et al. The cost and yield of
• photoscreening: impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic
• costs. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005;42(2):103-11.
• Clausen MM, Arnold RW. Pediatric eye/vision screening. Referral criteria
• for the pedia vision plus optix s 04 photoscreener compared to visual
• acuity and digital photoscreening. Kindergarten computer photoscreening.
• Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2007;22(2):83-9.
• Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, Arnold RW, Silbert D et al. POS Vision
• Screening Committee. Guidelines for automated preschool vision
• screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS. 2013;17(1):4-8.
• doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.012. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
• Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G. Visual screening of Swedish
• children: an ophthalmological evaluation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
• ;79(3):240-4.
• Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G, Dehlgaard J. Preventable
• vision loss in children: A public health concern. Am Orthop J 2006;5(6):3-6
• Mary Louise Z. Collins Screening Methods for Detection of Preclinical Visual
• Loss in Children: Implementing Programs—The Political Will. Am Orthop J
• ;5(6):50-3
• Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the Plusoptix vision
• screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children. J AAPOS.
• ;12(5):490-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
• Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM et al. ALSPAC Study
• Team. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school
• entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J
• Ophthalmol. 2003;87(8):988-93.
• Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Friedman T, Naor J, Eibschitz N et al. Early screening
• for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of
• amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2000;4(4):194-9.
• Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V et al. Comparison of preschool vision
• screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the
• Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(4):637-50.
• Bloomberg JD, Suh DW. The accuracy of the plusoptiX A08 photoscreener
• in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in central Iowa. JAAPOS.
• ;17(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.03.014.
• Moghaddam AA, Kargozar A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Najjaran M et al.
• Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the
• Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study. Br J
• Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):83-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.190405. Epub 2011
• Apr 21.
• Matta NS, Arnold RW, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Comparison between the
• plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1591-
• doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.294.
• Simons BD, Siatkowski RM, Schiffman JC, Berry BE et al. Pediatric
• photoscreening for strabismus and refractive errors in a high-risk
• population. Ophthalmology. 1999 ;106(6):1073-80.
• Arnold RW. Pseudo-false positive eye/vision photoscreening due to
• accommodative insufficiency. A serendipitous benefit for poor readers?
• Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2004;19(2):75-80.
• Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the plusoptiX S04
• photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children aged
• to 5. J AAPOS. 2010;14(2):147-9.
• Arnold RW, Armitage MD. Performance of four new photoscreeners
• on pediatric patients with high risk amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol
• Strabismus. 2014;51(1):46-52. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20131223-02.
• Epub 2014 Jan 3.
• McCurry TC, Lawrence LM, Wilson ME, Mayo L The plusoptiX S08
• photoscreener as a vision screening tool for children with autism. J AAPOS.
• ;17(4):374-7.
• Dahlmann-Noor AH, Vrotsou K, Kostakis V, Brown J, Heath J et al. Vision
• screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with goldstandard
• orthoptic assessment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;93(3):342-5.
• References
• J hum rhythm - June 2016;2(2):94-98