<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article         dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>joiss</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">2147-7841</issn>
                                                                                                        <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Karabük Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id/>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <title-group>
                                                                                                                                                            <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>Measures of Transforming the Summative Assessment in Formative Assessment in Students Activities Evaluation at Constanta Maritime University</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Stanca</surname>
                                    <given-names>Costel</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Georgescu</surname>
                                    <given-names>Stefan</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Mina</surname>
                                    <given-names>Simona</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Olteanu</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ana</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20150611">
                    <day>06</day>
                    <month>11</month>
                    <year>2015</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>5</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                        <fpage>32</fpage>
                                        <lpage>47</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20150611">
                        <day>06</day>
                        <month>11</month>
                        <year>2015</year>
                    </date>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2015, Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Traditionally and within theoretical approaches, examiner’s report on courses at final exam in the universities consists of two components: firstly, there is a summative assessment where a judgment is made on a thesis that has met the standards established by the discipline for the award of the degree; second there is a conception about the development and the formative aspects of the exam, where examiners provide feedback to assist the students to improve their learning tasks. The main objective of this paper is to determine if periodically exams ‘students are primarily assessment or feedback? In this paper it is used feedback term referring on the trajectory of professor-student reports, in an effort to distinguish it clearly a summative assessment form. The small-scale study of four examiner’s reports aimed to identify the nature of them and whether the reports provided are primarily summative assessment or feedback</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Traditionally and within theoretical approaches, examiner’s report on courses at finalexam in the universities consists of two components: firstly, there is a summative assessmentwhere a judgment is made on a thesis that has met the standards established by the discipline forthe award of the degree; second there is a conception about the development and the formativeaspects of the exam, where examiners provide feedback to assist the students to improve theirlearning tasks. The main objective of this paper is to determine if periodically exams ‘students areprimarily assessment or feedback? In this paper it is used feedback term referring on the trajectoryof professor-student reports, in an effort to distinguish it clearly a summative assessment form.The small-scale study of four examiner’s reports aimed to identify the nature of them and whetherthe reports provided are primarily summative assessment or feedback.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Feedback</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   assessment</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   evaluation process</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   quality in education</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>-</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Clynes, M. P., Reftery, S. E. C. (2008). Feedback: an essential element of student learning in clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 8, 405-411</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Clynes, M. (2008). Providing feedback on clinical performance to student’s nurses in children’s nursing: challenges facing preceptors. Journal of children’s and young people’s nursing 2(1), 29-35</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dohrenwend, A. (2002). Serving up the feedback sandwich. Family Practice Management 9 (10), 43- 49</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Eraut, M. Feedback. Learning in health and social care 5 (3), 111-118</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gibbs, G., &amp; Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ leraning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 13-29, Retrieved on 11 December 2013 from http://resources.glos.ac.uk</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jerome, P.J. (1995). Coaching through effective feedback, Kogan, London</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kiley, M. (2009). You don’t want a smart Alec’: Selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations. Studies in higher education, 34(8), 889-903</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koh, L.C. (2007). Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education in practice.doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.08.00</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kumar, V., Stracke, E. (2011). Examiner’s reports in theses: feedback or assessment? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(2011)211-222</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rowntree, D. (1987) Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? Kogan, London</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Russel, T. (1994). Effective feedback skills, Kogan, London</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sadler, D.T. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of the instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Young, P. (2000). I might as well give up: self- esteem and mature students feelings about feedback on assignments. Journal of Further and Higher Education 24(3), 409-418</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative assessment. Designing assessment to inform and improve student performance, Jossey- Bass, San Francisco.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
