Research Article

Understanding Impacts of Cultural Tourism on Sustainability of Rural Architecture in Three Villages of Bursa

Volume: 4 Number: 2 December 15, 2019
EN

Understanding Impacts of Cultural Tourism on Sustainability of Rural Architecture in Three Villages of Bursa

Abstract

This paper aims to describe consequences of cultural tourism for sustainability of rural architectural heritage, forming traditional identity of three villages, named as Misi, Gölyazı, and Tirilye, in Bursa. Before making a detailed assessment, it is better to give brief information about legalization concerning relation in between tourism and rural architectural heritage. Afterwards, the common values of selected case studies are given while also evaluating the problems and threats on their sustainability. It concludes with recommendations defining what can be done to conserve and reuse rural architectural heritage in villages of a historic city while preventing and improving them against touristic demands. Hence, this study is essential as investigating the challenges in conservation of rural areas in City of Bursa, one of the UNESCO World Heritage Sites (WHS) in Turkey, while revealing rise of touristic activities together with increasing interest and public awareness in its architectural and natural heritage.

Keywords

tourism,sustainability,rural architecture,Bursa

References

  1. Acun Özgünler, S.; Özgünler, M. (2018), “A Research on Sustainability of Traditional Buildings by Re-Using The Local Earthen Materials”, Gazi University Journal of Science, GU J Sci 31(4): 985-994 (2018), pp. 985-994.
  2. Aslam, M.S.; Awang, K.W. (2015), “Enterprising Rural Tourism for Sustainable Rural Development in Sri Lanka”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (Special Issue), pp. 27-33.
  3. Babayev, A. (2016), “Kırsal Turizme Kavramsal Yaklaşım, Kırsal Turizmin Önemi ve Etkileri: Türkiye örneği”, [A conceptual Approach in Rural Tourism, Importance and Effects of Rural Tourism], Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sayı: CİEP Özel Sayısı, pp. 534-543.
  4. Bahçe, A.S. (2009), “Kırsal Gelişimde Kültür (Mirası) Turizmi Modeli”, [Cultural (Heritage) Tourism Model in Rural Development], Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sayı:25, pp.1-12.
  5. Baysal, K., Özgürel, G., Çeken, H. (2016), “Aydın Yöresindeki Yerel Etkinliklerin Kırsal Turizm Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, [The Evaluation of Rural Tourism in Aydın Region in Terms of the Local Activities], International Jorunal of Social and Economic Sciences, 6 (1), pp. 100-108.
  6. Beceren Öztürk, R., Ispalar Çahantimur, A. (2010), “Valuation of Traditional Turkish Wooden Building Culture in Terms of Ecological and Socio-Cultural Sustainability, Case Study Cumalıkızık / Bursa”, World Applied Sciences Journal, 10 (4), pp. 466-471.
  7. Beyhan, S.G., Ünügür, S.M., (2005), “Çağdaş Gereksinmeler Bağlamında Sürdürülebilir Turizm ve Kimlik Modeli”, [Sustainable Tourism and Identity Model in the Context of Contemporary Requirements ], İTÜ Dergisi / a, Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, cilt:4, sayı:2, pp. 79-87.
  8. Boz, M., Eryaman, M.Y., Özkan, Ç., (2014), “Kırsal Kalkınmada Turizmin Önemi: Nusratlı Köyü Örneği”, [The Importance of Tourism in Rural Development: Nusratlı Village Case Study], JED / GKD, no:9:2, pp. 293-308.
  9. Bulut, Z., Yılmaz, H. (2008), “Evaluation of Natural, Cultural and Visual Values in Terms of Alternative Tourism in the Example of Kemaliye (Erzincan / Turkey), International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 2 (2), pp. 13-20.
  10. Butler, R. and Clark, G. , 1992. “Tourism in rural areas: Canada and United Kingdom”. Economy and Society, 2, 166–186.