Research Article

Vandalism problem in tourism and solution proposals: The case of Nevşehir

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 30, 2020
İbrahim Yılmaz , Gülsüm Tabak *, Arif Nihat Samur
EN

Vandalism problem in tourism and solution proposals: The case of Nevşehir

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the phenomenon of vandalism with in the scope of tourism, to reveal the vandal event soccurring in Nevşehir Province with pictures and interview sand to develop solutions for its prevention. Within the scope of the study, literature review conducted by the researcher and then the damages caused by vandalism to the environment were tried to reveal by the help of the photographs taken in certain parts of Nevşehir. In the study, primary data were obtained from the interview with three district mayors and two non-governmental organizations (NGO) representatives. In the analysis of the collected data, descriptive analysis method, which is one of the qualitative research analysis techniques, was preferred. According to the primary and secondary data obtained, it was concluded that vandalism incidents were wide spread in Nevşehir province and that these behaviors caused serious damage to natural and historical artifacts. Another noteworthy result is that there are problems in taking the necessary measures due to the confusion of authority stemming from the presence of more than one institution in decision-making position.

Keywords

Tourism , Vandalism , Nevşehir

References

  1. Açıkgöz Ş.G. and Ahunbay Z. (2008). 19. Yüzyıl Kayseri Kiliseleri İçin Koruma Önerileri. İTÜ Dergisi, 7(2), 26-37.
  2. Akyol, E. (2006). Kent Mobilyaları Tasarım ve Kullanım Süreci, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  3. Allen, V.L and Greenberger, D.B. (1978). Anaesthetic theory of vandalism. Crime Delinquency, 24 (3), 309-321. Avcı, E., Acar, V. and Aslıtürk, G.E. (2016). Kültürel Varlıklar Üzerinde Yapılan Tahribatların Turizm Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi (Kuşadası-SelçukÖrneği). Ulakbilge, 4 (8), 171-208.
  4. Bhati, A. and Pearce, P. (2016). Vandalism and tourism settings: An integrative review. Tourism Management, 57, 91-105.
  5. Boz, B. and Beyaztaş, F. (2001). Vandalizm. Sürekli Tıp EğitimiDergisi, 10 (3), 17-18.
  6. Cappadocia Online (2020). Soğanlı vadisi hakkında bilgi. http://www.cappadociaonline.com/soganlitr.html (Date of Access: 01.04.2020)
  7. CBS Philliy. (2014). Vineland, New Jersey. https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2014/01/24/2-south-jersey-churches-vandalized-overnight/ (Date of Access: 18.03.2020).
  8. Conklın, J.E. (1989). Criminology. NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  9. ÇevikAladağ, Ş.A. (2011). Kamusal alanda sanat eserinin kalıcılığı ve Mersin Kültür Parkı’nın değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, Mersin.
  10. DeMore, S.W., Fisher, J.D. and Baron, R.M. (1988). The Equity‐Control Model as a Predictor of Vandalism Among College Students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18 (1), 80-91.