Genel Anestezi Altında Prone Pozisyonda Farklı Taze Gaz Akımının; Maliyet, Havayolu ve Endotrakeal Kaf Basınçlarına Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2021, , 467 - 471, 01.05.2021

Ahmet Gültekin , Ayhan Sahin , İlker Yıldırım , Cavidan Arar

https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.790635

Öz

Amaç: Prone pozisyonda genel anestezi alan hastaların, farklı taze akımlarının (düşük, orta, yüksek) maliyet, havayolu ve endotrakeal kaf basınçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.
Yöntemler: Çalışmaya ASA I-II, prone pozisyonda lomber vertebra cerrahisi geçiren, 18 yaş üzeri 150 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar düşük akım (n=50, taze gaz akımı:1 l/dk), orta akım (n=50, taze gaz akımı: 2 l/dk) ve yüksek akım (n=50, taze gaz akımı: 4 l/dk) olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Bu gruplardaki hastaların ilk 60 dakika (0, 15, 30, 45, 60.dakika olarak) içinde perop kalp atım hızı, periferik oksijen saturasyonu, ortalama arter basınçları, endotrakeal kaf basınçları, havayolu tepe ve plato basınçları ve maliyet açısından ise vaka sonunda kullanılan cihaz verileri aracılığı ile kullanlan inhale gazların (sevoflurane, oksijen, azot protoksit) miktarları kayıt edildi.
Bulgular: Gruplar arasında hemodinami, havayolu basınçları ve endotrakeal kaf basınçları açısından fark yoktu. Maliyet açısından ise inhale anestezik ajan, oksijen ve azot protoksit açısından düşük akım anestezi grubunda anlamlı fark vardır.
Sonuç: Modern anestezi cihazları ile düşük akım ile anestezi uygulamasından kaçınmaya gerek yoktur ancak deneyim eksikliği veya düşük akım anestezi tercih etmek istemeyen anestezistler için taze gaz akımının 2 l/dk fazla olmamasını önermekteyiz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Düşük akım anestezi, Prone pozisyon, Genel anestezi, Sevofluran

Different fresh gas flows in prone position under general anesthesia: comparison of costs and effects on airway and endotracheal cuff pressures

Öz

Background/Aim: Many studies have been performed on different fresh gas flows for general anesthesia. In this study, we aimed to compare the costs, airway, and endotracheal cuff pressures of different fresh flows (low, medium, high) of patients receiving general anesthesia in the prone position.
Methods: A total of 150 ASA I-II patients over the age of 18 years who underwent lumbar vertebral surgery in prone position were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into three groups: Low-flow (n=50, fresh gas flow: 1 l/min), medium-flow (n=50, fresh gas flow: 2 l/min) and high-flow (n=50, fresh gas flow: 4 l/min). In addition to the preoperative heart rates, peripheral oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressures, endotracheal cuff pressures, airway peak and plateau pressures in the first 60 minutes (as 0th, 15th, 30th, 45th, 60th minutes) were noted, and the amount of inhaled gases (sevoflurane, oxygen, nitrogen protoxide) based on the data of the device were recorded to evaluate cost.
Results: The two groups were similar in terms of hemodynamics, airway, and endotracheal cuff pressures. Regarding cost, there was a significant difference in the low-flow anesthesia group in terms of inhaled anesthetic agents, oxygen, and nitrogen protoxide.
Conclusion: With modern anesthesia machines, it is unnecessary to avoid low-flow anesthesia applications. However, we recommend that the fresh gas flow be more than 2 l/min for anesthetists lacking experience or those who do not prefer low-flow anesthesia.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Low-flow anesthesia, Prone position, General anesthesia, Sevoflurane

Kaynakça

• 1. Baker AB. Low flow and closed circuits. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22:341-2. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9402200402.
• 2. Baum JA, Aitkenhead AR. Low-flow anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:37-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06189.x.
• 3. Vecil M, Di Stefano C, Zorzi F, Saltarini M, De Monte A. Low flow, minimal flow and closed circuit system inhalational anesthesia in modern clinical practice. Signa vitae. 2008;3:33-6.
• 4. Baum J. Niedrigflußnarkosen. Anaesthesist. 1994;43:194-210. doi: 10.1007/s001010050049.
• 5. Kılıç Y. A Reminder to Anesthesiologists: Low-Flow Anesthesia. J Clin Anal Med 2016;7:183-5.
• 6. Hendrickx JF, De Cooman S, Vandeput DM, Van Alphen J, Coddens J, Deloof T, et al. Air-oxygen mixtures in circle systems. J Clin Anesth 2001;13:461-4. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00303-8.
• 7. Kennedy RR, Hendrickx JF, Feldman JM. There are no dragons: Low-flow anaesthesia with sevoflurane is safe. Anaesth Intensive Care 2019;47:223-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X19843304.
• 8. McGain F, Bishop JR, Elliot-Jones LM, Story DA, Imberger GL. A survey of the choice of general anaesthetic agents in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care 2019;47:235-41. doi: 10.1177/0310057X19836104.
• 9. Chatrath V, Khetarpal R, Bansal D, Kaur H. Sevoflurane in low-flow anesthesia using "equilibration point". Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:284-90. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.172343.
• 10. Doger C, Kahveci K, Ornek D, But A, Aksoy M, Gokcinar D, et al. Effects of Low-Flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Pulmonary Functions in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:3068467. doi: 10.1155/2016/3068467.
• 11. Isik Y, Goksu S, Kocoglu H, Oner U. Low flow desflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:60-4. doi: 10.1017/S026502150500178X.
• 12. Kupisiak J, Goch R, Polenceusz W, Szyca R, Leksowski K. Bispectral index and cerebral oximetry in low-flow and high-flow rate anaesthesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a randomized controlled trial. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2011;6:226-30. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.26256.
• 13. Bahar S, Arslan M, Urfalioglu A, Gisi G, Oksuz G, Bilal B, et al. Low-flow anaesthesia with a fixed fresh gas flow rate. J Clin Monit Comput 2019;33:115-21. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0135-2.
• 14. Toal P, Chiplonkar S, Panchal P. A randomised prospective comparison of equilibration point and changing gas composition during low-flow anaesthesia with sevoflurane vs desflurane. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:814-19. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_31_19.
• 15. Ip-Yam PC, Goh MH, Chan YH, Kong CF. Clinical evaluation of the Mapleson theoretical ideal fresh gas flow sequence at the start of low-flow anaesthesia with isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane. Anaesthesia 2001;56:160-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01835.x.
• 16. Horwitz M, Jakobsson JG. Desflurane and sevoflurane use during low- and minimal-flow anesthesia at fixed vaporizer settings. Minerva Anestesiol 2016;82:180-5.
• 17. Bilgi M, Goksu S, Mizrak A, Cevik C, Gul R, Koruk S, et al. Comparison of the effects of low-flow and high-flow inhalational anaesthesia with nitrous oxide and desflurane on mucociliary activity and pulmonary function tests. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011;28:279-83. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283414cb7.
• 18. Feldman JM. Managing fresh gas flow to reduce environmental contamination. Anesth Analg 2012;114:1093-101. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824eee0d.
• 19. Baum JA. Low-flow anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1996;13:432-5. doi: 10.1097/00003643-199609000-00002.
• 20. Odin I, Feiss P. Low flow and economics of inhalational anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005;19:399-413. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.01.006.
• 21. Feldman JM, Lo C, Hendrickx J. Estimating the Impact of Carbon Dioxide Absorbent Performance Differences on Absorbent Cost During Low-Flow Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2020;130:374-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004059.
• 22. Therapeutic Goods Administration Sevoflurane – product information. Oct 2018. https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2012-PI-01017-3 Accessed 09 Jun 2020.