Review

Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review

Volume: 10 Number: 3 August 30, 2023
EN

Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of the differences in heavy metal adsorption on natural, modified, and synthetic zeolites. Heavy metal treatment and adsorption are critical issues in today's modern world, and despite advancements in technology, they remain a global challenge. Industrial effluents are a major source of heavy metal pollutants, which have a severe impact on human health and the environment. Therefore, removing heavy metals from contaminated water and wastewater is a necessity. Adsorption is the most commonly used method for removing heavy metals from the environment due to its cost-effectiveness, design, and performance. Among various adsorbents, zeolites are currently considered a suitable method due to their cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and the varying ion-exchange capacity of natural zeolites worldwide for cations such as ammonium and heavy metal ions. The findings of this research could provide useful information for developing efficient and cost-effective methods for the removal of heavy metals from water and wastewater, thus addressing a critical global issue. The outcomes of this research contribute to promoting a green and healthy environment.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Türksoy. R., T. G., Yalçın., E. İ., Türksoy. Ö., Demir. G.Y.,. Removal of heavy metals from textile industry wastewater. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies. 2021, 2 (2), 44-50. Available from: .
  2. 2. Motsa, M. M.; Thwala, J. M.; Msagati, T. A. M.; Mamba, B. B. The potential of melt-mixed polypropylene–zeolite blends in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous media. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2011, 36 (14), 1178-1188. Available from: .
  3. 3. El-Azim, H.; Mourad, F. Removal of Heavy Metals Cd (II), Fe (III) and Ni (II), from Aqueous Solutions by Natural (Clinoptilolite) Zeolites and Application to Industrial Wastewater. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology 2018, 7, 1-13. Available from: .
  4. 4. Aghazadeh, S.; Safarzadeh, E.; Gharabaghi, M.; Irannajad, M. Modification of natural zeolite for Cu removal from waste waters. Desalination and Water Treatment 2016, 57, 1-8. Available from: .
  5. 5. World Health, O. Lead in drinking-water: background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality; WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/09; World Health Organization., Geneva, 2003. Available from: .
  6. 6. Krauklis, A.; Ozola, R.; Burlakovs, J.; Rugele, K.; Kirillov, K.; Trubaca-Boginska, A.; Rubenis, K.; Stepanova, V.; Klavins, M. FeOOH and Mn8O10Cl3 modified zeolites for As(V) removal in aqueous medium. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2017, 92 (8), 1948-1960. Available from: .
  7. 7. Kong, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Tang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, S. Removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater by artificial zeolite spheres loaded with nano Fe–Al bimetallic oxide in constructed wetland. Chemosphere. 2020, 257, 127224. Available from: .
  8. 8. Türkmen, M. Removal of Heavy Metals From Wastewaters by Use of Natural Zeolites. In Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. , 2002; Department of Environmental Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University.: Vol. 13, pp 574-580.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Transition Metal Chemistry, Chemical Engineering

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

August 30, 2023

Submission Date

March 10, 2023

Acceptance Date

June 19, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 10 Number: 3

APA
Mudaber, S., & Batur, J. (2023). Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 10(3), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1263041
AMA
1.Mudaber S, Batur J. Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review. JOTCSA. 2023;10(3):847-860. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1263041
Chicago
Mudaber, Sebghatullah, and Jenaidullah Batur. 2023. “Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 10 (3): 847-60. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1263041.
EndNote
Mudaber S, Batur J (August 1, 2023) Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 10 3 847–860.
IEEE
[1]S. Mudaber and J. Batur, “Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review”, JOTCSA, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 847–860, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.18596/jotcsa.1263041.
ISNAD
Mudaber, Sebghatullah - Batur, Jenaidullah. “Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 10/3 (August 1, 2023): 847-860. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1263041.
JAMA
1.Mudaber S, Batur J. Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review. JOTCSA. 2023;10:847–860.
MLA
Mudaber, Sebghatullah, and Jenaidullah Batur. “Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 3, Aug. 2023, pp. 847-60, doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1263041.
Vancouver
1.Sebghatullah Mudaber, Jenaidullah Batur. Differences in Heavy Metals Adsorption on Natural, Modified, and Synthetic Zeolites-A Review. JOTCSA. 2023 Aug. 1;10(3):847-60. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1263041

Cited By