Research Article

PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants

Volume: 5 Number: 2 January 1, 2018
EN

PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants

Abstract

This study is about preparation of two different organoclays with cationic surfactants and their poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites with increased thermal and mechanical behavior. Organoclays were prepared modifying clay mineral with solution intercalation method using aqueous solutions of cationic surfactants dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTABr) and cetylpyridinium bromide (CPBr). Obtained organoclays (D-MMT and C-MMT for DTABr/MMT and CPBr/MMT, respectively) were characterized using different methods including zeta potential and XRD. Results indicated an absolute decrease in zeta potential about 20 mV for C-MMT, and 14 mV for D-MMT indicating flocculation and coating of the surface. Moreover measurements indicated that interlayer distance increased based on basal spacing peak shift whose value was 1.27 nm for NaMMT, whereas 1.40 nm for D-MMT, and 1.75 nm for C-MMT. The organoclays were used in preparation of PVA/clay nanocomposites; thermal stability of the nanocomposites were determined using TGA, while mechanical strength measurements were done using DMA. Maximum thermal decomposition temperature of the pristine PVA and nanocomposites were compared and an average increase of 4°C were observed. Also activation energy of the decomposition was observed ca. 40 kj mol-1 higher than pristine PVA.

Keywords

References

  1. Sinha Ray S, Okamoto M. Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Progress in Polymer Science 2003;28:1539–641. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002.
  2. Fahmy TYA, Mobarak F. Nanocomposites from natural cellulose fibers filled with kaolin in presence of sucrose. Carbohydrate Polymers 2008;72:751–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.01.008.
  3. Pavlidou S, Papaspyrides CD. A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Progress in Polymer Science 2008;33:1119–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008.
  4. Mallakpour S, Dinari M. Biomodification of cloisite Na+ with L-methionine amino acid and preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol)/organoclay nanocomposite films. J Appl Polym Sci 2012;124:4322–30. DOI: 10.1002/app.35540.
  5. Wang B, Yin Y, Liu C, Yu S, Chen K. Synthesis and characterization of clay/polyaniline nanofiber hybrids. J Appl Polym Sci 2013;128:1304–12. DOI: 10.1002/app.38472.
  6. Utracki LA. Clay-containing polymeric nanocomposites. Shrewsbury: Rapra Technology Ltd; 2004. ISBN:1-85957-437-8.
  7. Mandalia T, Bergaya F. Organo clay mineral–melted polyolefin nanocomposites Effect of surfactant/CEC ratio. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2006;67:836–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.12.007.
  8. Kokabi M, Sirousazar M, Hassan ZM. PVA–clay nanocomposite hydrogels for wound dressing. European Polymer Journal 2007;43:773–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.11.030.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Chemical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Cüneyt H. Ünlü
Istanbul Technical University, Science & Letters Faculty, Chemistry Department, Maslak, Istanbul
Türkiye

Sevim İşçi Turutoğlu This is me
Istanbul Technical University, Science & Letters Faculty, Physics Department, Maslak, Istanbul
Türkiye

Oya Galioğlu Atıcı
Istanbul Technical University, Science & Letters Faculty, Chemistry Department, Maslak, Istanbul
Türkiye

Ömer Işık Ece This is me
Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Maslak, Istanbul
Türkiye

Nurfer Güngör This is me
Istanbul Technical University, Science & Letters Faculty, Physics Department, Maslak, Istanbul
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 1, 2018

Submission Date

April 22, 2017

Acceptance Date

February 20, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Ünlü, C. H., İşçi Turutoğlu, S., Galioğlu Atıcı, O., Ece, Ö. I., & Güngör, N. (2018). PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 5(2), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.307602
AMA
1.Ünlü CH, İşçi Turutoğlu S, Galioğlu Atıcı O, Ece ÖI, Güngör N. PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants. JOTCSA. 2018;5(2):415-432. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.307602
Chicago
Ünlü, Cüneyt H., Sevim İşçi Turutoğlu, Oya Galioğlu Atıcı, Ömer Işık Ece, and Nurfer Güngör. 2018. “PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 5 (2): 415-32. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.307602.
EndNote
Ünlü CH, İşçi Turutoğlu S, Galioğlu Atıcı O, Ece ÖI, Güngör N (January 1, 2018) PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 5 2 415–432.
IEEE
[1]C. H. Ünlü, S. İşçi Turutoğlu, O. Galioğlu Atıcı, Ö. I. Ece, and N. Güngör, “PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants”, JOTCSA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 415–432, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.18596/jotcsa.307602.
ISNAD
Ünlü, Cüneyt H. - İşçi Turutoğlu, Sevim - Galioğlu Atıcı, Oya - Ece, Ömer Işık - Güngör, Nurfer. “PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 5/2 (January 1, 2018): 415-432. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.307602.
JAMA
1.Ünlü CH, İşçi Turutoğlu S, Galioğlu Atıcı O, Ece ÖI, Güngör N. PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants. JOTCSA. 2018;5:415–432.
MLA
Ünlü, Cüneyt H., et al. “PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 2, Jan. 2018, pp. 415-32, doi:10.18596/jotcsa.307602.
Vancouver
1.Cüneyt H. Ünlü, Sevim İşçi Turutoğlu, Oya Galioğlu Atıcı, Ömer Işık Ece, Nurfer Güngör. PVA Nanocomposites Of Organoclays Obtained Using Different Cationic Surfactants. JOTCSA. 2018 Jan. 1;5(2):415-32. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.307602

Cited By