Research Article

Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries

Volume: 5 Number: 3 September 1, 2018
EN

Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries

Abstract

Metal ions and intrinsically disordered peptides amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 are at the center of Alzheimer´s disease pathology. Divalent copper ion binds to amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 peptides with varying coordination chemistries. Experiments face challenges in the measurements of divalent copper ion bound monomeric amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 in an aqueous solution medium because of fast conformational changes, rapid aggregation processes and solvent effects. Theoretical studies complement experiments and provide insights at the atomic and molecular levels with dynamics. However, until recently, potential functions for simulating divalent copper ion bound amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 peptides with varying coordination chemistries were lacking. Using new potential functions that were developed for divalent copper centers, Cu(II), including three histidine residues and an oxygen-ligated amino acid residue, the structures and thermodynamic properties of Cu(II)-bound amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 peptides in an aqueous solution medium were studied. For these purposes, extensive first principles calculations and replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations were conducted. In this study, the secondary and tertiary structural properties, conformational Gibbs free energy values, potential of mean force surfaces, salt bridges and aggregation propensities of aqueous Cu(II)-bound amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 peptides are presented. Different than previous findings in the literature, results clearly show that the coordination chemistry variations impact the structural and thermodynamic properties of divalent Cu(II) bound amyloid-β alloforms in water. Specificities about these differences are revealed in this study at the atomic level with dynamics. Results presented herein are the first to offer a comparison of the monomeric Cu(II)-bound amyloid-β40 and amyloid-β42 peptides with varying coordination chemistries using bonded model potential functions.


Keywords

References

  1. 1. Faller P, Hureau C. Bioinorganic chemistry of copper and zinc ions coordinated to amyloid-beta peptide. Dalton Trans. 2009 Feb;21:1080-1094.
  2. 2. Atwood C. S, Moir R. D, Huang X. D, Scarpa R. C, Bacarra N. M, Romano D. M, Hartshorn M. K, Tanzi R. E, Bush A. I. Dramatic aggregation of Alzheimer Aβ by Cu(II) is induced by conditions representing physiological acidosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1998 May;273:12817-12826.
  3. 3. Zou J, Kajita K, Sugimoto N. Cu2+ inhibits the aggregation of amyloid beta-peptide(1-42) in vitro. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001 Jun; 40:2274-2277.
  4. 4. Raman B, Ban T, Yamagucchi K, Sakai M. Kawai T, Naiki H, Goto Y. Metal ion-dependent effects of clioquinol on the fibril growth of an amyloid beta peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2005 Apr; 280:16157-16162.
  5. 5. House E, Collingwood J, Khan A, Korchazkina O, Berthon G, Exley C. Aluminium, iron, zinc and copper influence the in vitro formation of amyloid fibrils of A beta(42) in a manner which may have consequences for metal chelation therapy in Alzheimer's disease. J. Alz. Dis. 2004 Jun;6:291-301.
  6. 6. Yang X-H, Huang H-C, Chen L, Xu W, Jiang Z-F. Coordinating to Three Histidine Residues: Cu (II) Promotes Oligomeric and Fibrillar Amyloid-β Peptide to Precipitate in a Non-β Aggregation Manner. J. Alz. Dis. 2009 Nov;18:799-810.
  7. 7. Yu H, Ren J, Qu X. Different Hydration Changes Accompanying Copper and Zinc Binding to Amyloid β-Peptide: Water Contribution to Metal Binding. ChemBioChem. 2008 Feb;9:879-882.
  8. 8. Dai X, Sun Y, Gao Z, Jiang Z. Copper enhances amyloid-β peptide neurotoxicity and non β-aggregation: a series of experiments conducted upon copper-bound and copper-free amyloid-β peptide. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2010 May;41:66-73.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Chemical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

May 16, 2018

Acceptance Date

August 16, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 5 Number: 3

APA
Coskuner-weber, O. (2018). Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 5(3), 981-1008. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.424144
AMA
1.Coskuner-weber O. Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries. JOTCSA. 2018;5(3):981-1008. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.424144
Chicago
Coskuner-weber, Orkid. 2018. “Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 5 (3): 981-1008. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.424144.
EndNote
Coskuner-weber O (September 1, 2018) Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 5 3 981–1008.
IEEE
[1]O. Coskuner-weber, “Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries”, JOTCSA, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 981–1008, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.18596/jotcsa.424144.
ISNAD
Coskuner-weber, Orkid. “Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 5/3 (September 1, 2018): 981-1008. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.424144.
JAMA
1.Coskuner-weber O. Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries. JOTCSA. 2018;5:981–1008.
MLA
Coskuner-weber, Orkid. “Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 981-1008, doi:10.18596/jotcsa.424144.
Vancouver
1.Orkid Coskuner-weber. Revisiting Cu(II) Bound Amyloid-β40 and Amyloid-β42 Peptides: Varying Coordination Chemistries. JOTCSA. 2018 Sep. 1;5(3):981-1008. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.424144

Cited By