Yıl 2021, Cilt 8 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 229 - 238 2021-02-28

Effects of selected synthetic and biological insecticides on microbial population and microbial activities of soil samples

Adewole SEBİOMO [1]

Modern agriculture depends upon the wide variety of natural and synthetically produced chemicals such insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and other pesticides This work studied the effect of synthetic and biological insecticides on microbial population and microbial activities in soil samples. The insecticides used in this study are cypermethrin, chloropyrifos, neem extracts and ginger extracts. Bacteria and fungi were isolated and identified from the soil samples. TBC, TCC and TFC were determined. Dehydrogenase activity, microbial respiration and microbial biomass carbon in the soil samples were also examined. The control soil samples recorded the highest TBC, TFC, TCC, dehydrogenase activity, microbial respiration and microbial biomass carbon. Soils treated with chloropyrifos recorded the lowest total coliform count of 0.10×105 ± 0.00 cfu/g, while cyperforce treated soils recorded the lowest total bacterial count of 0.58×105 ± 0.025cfu/g. Cyperforce treated soils had the lowest effect on CO2 respired in the soil with a value of 1687.50 ± 1.500 mg/kg. 500 g/ml Neem leaf extract had the highest microbial biomass carbon value of 9.40 ± 0.100 KgC/m2. This work has shown that treatment with both synthetic and bio-insecticides resulted in significant drop in microbial population and microbial activity of soil samples.
microbial respiration, dehydrogenase activity, microbial biomass carbon, microbial population, cyperforce, chloropyrifos
  • 1. Zhang B, Bai Z, Hoefel D, Tang L, Wang X, Li B, Li Z, Zhuang G. The impacts of cypermethrin pesticide application on the non-target microbial community of the pepper plant phyllosphere. Science on Total Environment. 2009; 407:1915-1922.
  • 2. Ramudu A, Mohiddin G, Srinivasulu M, Rangaswamy V. Impact of fungicides chlorothaln oil and propiconacole on microbial activities in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) soils. International Scholarly Research Network Microbiology. 2011; pp (7)
  • 3. Nannipieri P, Cervelli S, Pema A. Enzyme activities in some Italian soils. Journal of Italian Agriculture. 2012; 73: 367-376.
  • 4. Diplock EE, Mardlin DP, Killham KS, Paton G I. Predicting bioremediation of hydrocarbons: laboratory to field scale. Environmental Pollution. 2009; 157 (6): 1831–40.
  • 5. Das AC, Mukherjee D. Soil application of insecticides influences microorganisms and Plant Nutrient Applied Soil Ecology. 2007;14: 55-62.
  • 6. Vig K, Singh DK, Agrarwal HC, Dhawan AK, Dureja P. Soil micro- organisms in cotton fields sequencially treated with insecticides. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2009; 69:263-276.
  • 7. Sarfraz H, Siddique T, Saleem M, Arshad M, Khalid A. Impact of pesticides on soil microbial diversity, enzymes and biochemical reactions. Advances in Agronomy. 2009; 102:159-200.
  • 8. Klimek B. Effect of Long-Term Zinc Pollution on Soil Microbial Community Resistance to Repeated Contamination. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2012; 8(4): 617-622
  • 9. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1987; 17 (6): 837 – 842.
  • 10. Iqbal MA, Bartakke KV. Isolation of Pesticide Degrading Microorganisms from soil. Advances in Bioresearch. 2014; 5(4):164-168
  • 11. Nasim G, Ilyas N, Shabbir A. Study of effect of organic pesticides: Endosulfan and Bifenthrin on growth of some soil fungi. Mycopathology. 2005; 3 (1&2): 27-31.
  • 12. Ajaz M, Jabeen N, Akhtar S, Rasool SA. Cloropyrifos resistant bacteria from Pakistani soils: isolation, identification, resistance profile and growth profile. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2005; 37(2): 381-388
  • 13. Liu J, Xie J, Chu Y, Sun C, Chen C, Wang Q. Combined effect of cypermethrin and copper on catalase activity in soil. J. Soils Sed. 2008; 8: 327-332.
  • 14. Bera S, Ghosh RK. Soil Microflora and Weed Management as Influenced byAtrazine 50 % WP in Sugarcane. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013; 1(2): 41- 47.
  • 15. Sebiomo A, Ogundero VW, Bankole SA. Effect of four herbicides onmierobial population, soil organic matter and dehydrogenase activity. African Journal of Biology. 2012; 10(5): 770-778.
  • 16. Rasool N, Reshi, ZA. Effect of the fungicide Mancozeb at different application rates on enzyme activities in a silt loam soil of the Kashmir Himalaya, India, Trop. Ecol. 2010; 51; 99-205.
  • 17. Caceres TP, He WX, Megharaj M, Naidu, R. Effect of insecticide fenamiphos on soil microbial activities in Australian and Ecuadorean soils. Journal of Environmental Science. 2009; 44: 13-17.
  • 18. Gundi V, Viswanath B, Chandra MS, Kumar VN, Reddy BR. Activities of cellulase and amylase in soils as influenced by insecticide interactions. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2007; 68: 278-285.
  • 19. Lopez J. Growth and denitrifying activity of Xanthobacter in the presence of selected pesticides. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006; 71: 563-567.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Kimya, Uygulamalı
Yayınlanma Tarihi Winter
Bölüm Makaleler

Orcid: 0000-0002-3930-0022
Yazar: Adewole SEBİOMO (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: Tai Solarin University of Education Ijagun Ogun State Nigeria
Ülke: Nigeria


Başvuru Tarihi : 3 Mayıs 2020
Kabul Tarihi : 27 Aralık 2020
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 28 Şubat 2021

Vancouver Sebiomo A . Effects of selected synthetic and biological insecticides on microbial population and microbial activities of soil samples. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry. 2021; 8(1): 229-238.