Ultrasound-Assisted Adsorption of Basic Blue 41 onto Salda mud: Optimization and Error Analysis

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 57 - 68, 28.02.2021

Elif Tüzün Selcan Karakuş

https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.795083

Öz

We investigated the ultrasound-assisted adsorption of Basic Blue 41 (BB41) dye from aqueous solutions using a green and low-cost adsorbent such as a Salda mud (SM) in our study. BET, FTIR, and SEM techniques were used to determine the morphology and the functional groups of SM before and after dye adsorption. Furthermore, we calculated different adsorption kinetic, isotherm, and error models (SSE, HYBRID, and ARE) parameters to evaluate the optimum experimental conditions such as the initial dye concentration of BB41 (6.25-50 ppm), SM dose (0.05–0.2 g), pH (3–10), and sonication time (400-3600 s). The value of uptake (%) of SM for BB41 was %94 at 50 ppm,25 °C at 3600 s. Following this, we found that the pseudo second-order (Type2) model of BB41 was the best fitted model with highest R2 (0.973-0.999) values. We developed a simple, low-cost, and fast to remove BM41 from water using natural and efficient SM adsorbent, which exhibited superior adsorption performance in wastewater treatment under ultrasonic irradiation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

salda mud, ultrasonic-assisted adsorption, error analysis

Teşekkür

The authors would like to thank Fatih Özbaş for assistance of SEM analysis.

Kaynakça

• 1. Aksu Z. Application of biosorption for the removal of organic pollutants: a review. Process biochemistry. 2005;40(3–4):997–1026.
• 2. Zia Z, Hartland A, Mucalo M. Use of low cost biopolymers and biopolymeric composite systems for heavy metal removal from water. International Journal of Environmental Science And Technology. 2020; 17:4389–4406.
• 3. Madhav S, Ahamad A, Singh AK, Kushawaha J, Chauhan JS, Sharma S, et al. Water Pollutants: Sources and Impact on the Environment and Human Health. In: Pooja D, Kumar P, Singh P, Patil S, editors. Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020;43–62.
• 4. Kulal DK, Loni PC, Dcosta C, Some S, Kalambate PK. Cyanobacteria: as a promising candidate for heavy-metals removal. In: Advances in Cyanobacterial Biology. Elsevier; 2020;291–300.
• 5. Karakuş S, Taşaltın N, Taşaltın C, Kilislioğlu A. Comparative study on ultrasonic assisted adsorption of Basic Blue 3, Basic Yellow 28 and Acid Red 336 dyes onto hydromagnesite stromatolite: kinetic, isotherm and error analysis. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2020;100528.
• 6. Sismanoglu T, Kismir Y, Karakus S. Single and binary adsorption of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions onto clinoptilolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010;184(1–3):164–9.
• 7. Gissawong N, Mukdasai S, Boonchiangma S, Sansuk S, Srijaranai S. A rapid and simple method for the removal of dyes and organophosphorus pesticides from water and soil samples using deep eutectic solvent embedded sponge. Chemosphere. 2020;260:127590.
• 8. Yashni G, Willy K, Al-Gheethi A, Mohamed R, Salleh SM, Hashim M. A Review on Green Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Coriandrum Sativum Leaf Extract For Degrading Dyes in Textile Wastewater: A Prospect Towards Green Chemistry. MS&E. 2020;736(4):042003.
• 9. Joseph J, Radhakrishnan RC, Johnson JK, Joy SP, Thomas J. Ion-exchange mediated removal of cationic dye-stuffs from water using ammonium phosphomolybdate. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2020;242:122488.
• 10. Goutam SP, Saxena G, Roy D, Yadav AK, Bharagava RN. Green synthesis of nanoparticles and their applications in water and wastewater treatment. In: Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety. Springer; 2020;349–79.
• 11. Ma J, Tang X, He Y, Fan Y, Chen J. Robust stable MoS2/GO filtration membrane for effective removal of dyes and salts from water with enhanced permeability. Desalination. 2020;480:114328.
• 12. Mukhlish MB, Khan MR, Islam M, Nazir M, Snigdha J, Akter R, et al. Decolorization of Reactive Dyes from Aqueous Solution Using Combined Coagulation-Flocculation and Photochemical Oxidation (UV/H₂O₂). Sustainable Chemical Engineering. 2020;51–61.
• 13. Jun BM, Kim S, Rho H, Park CM, Yoon Y. Ultrasound-assisted Ti3C2Tx MXene adsorption of dyes: Removal performance and mechanism analyses via dynamic light scattering. Chemosphere, 2020;126827.
• 14. Li J, Zhu K, Li R, Fan X, Lin H, Zhang H. The removal of azo dye from aqueous solution by oxidation with peroxydisulfate in the presence of granular activated carbon: Performance, mechanism and reusability. Chemosphere. 2020;259:127400.
• 15. Jawad AH, Abdulhameed AS, Mastuli MS. Acid-factionalized biomass material for methylene blue dye removal: a comprehensive adsorption and mechanism study. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2020;14(1):305–13.
• 16. Yu Q, Fan L, Li J. A novel process for asparagus polyphenols utilization by ultrasound assisted adsorption and desorption using resins. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2020;63:104920.
• 17. Sharifpour E, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Farsadrooh M, Dil EA, Javadian H. Modeling and optimization of ultrasound-assisted high performance adsorption of Basic Fuchsin by starch-capped zinc selenide nanoparticles/AC as a novel composite using response surface methodology. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;152:913–21.
• 18. Kifayatullah HM, Tahir H, Shah AR. Modeling and optimization of ultrasound-assisted adsorption of crystal violet dye by graphene oxide nanoparticles using response surface methodology. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2020;1–17.
• 19. Chin JY, Chng LM, Leong SS, Yeap SP, Yasin NHM, Toh PY. Removal of Synthetic Dye by Chlorella vulgaris Microalgae as Natural Adsorbent. Arabian Journal For Science And Engineering. 2020.
• 20. Pandey S, Do JY, Kim J, Kang M. Fast and highly efficient removal of dye from aqueous solution using natural locust bean gum based hydrogels as adsorbent. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;143:60–75.
• 21. Kazemi J, Javanbakht V. Alginate beads impregnated with magnetic Chitosan@ Zeolite nanocomposite for cationic methylene blue dye removal from aqueous solution. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2020;154:1426–37.
• 22. Al-Shahrani S. Phenomena of Removal of Crystal Violet from Wastewater Using Khulays Natural Bentonite. Journal of Chemistry. 2020;2020.
• 23. Tanji K, Arrahli A, Iboustaten EM, El Gaidoumi A, Kherchafi A, Benabdallah AC, et al. Valorization of Oued Sebou Natural Sediments (Fez-Morocco Area) as Adsorbent of Methylene Blue Dye: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Study. The Scientific World Journal. 2020;2020.
• 24. Rahimian R, Zarinabadi S. A review of studies on the removal of methylene blue dye from industrial wastewater using activated carbon adsorbents made from almond bark. Progress in Chemical and Biochemical Research. 2020;3(3):251–68.
• 25. Shi W, Ren H, Huang X, Li M, Tang Y, Guo F. Low cost red mud modified graphitic carbon nitride for the removal of organic pollutants in wastewater by the synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalysis. Separation and Purification Technology. 2020;237:116477.
• 26. Zhu M-X, Lee L, Wang H-H, Wang Z. Removal of an anionic dye by adsorption/precipitation processes using alkaline white mud. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;149(3):735–741.
• 27. Thakare SR, Thakare J, Kosankar P, Pal MR. A chief, industrial waste, Activated Red Mud for subtraction of Methylene blue dye from environment. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020.
• 28. Babu AN, Reddy DS, Sharma P, Kumar GS, Ravindhranath K, Mohan GK. Removal of hazardous indigo carmine dye from waste water using treated red mud. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2019;17:198–208.
• 29. Foo KY, Hameed BH. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chemical engineering journal. 2010;156(1):2–10.
• 30. Markovski JS, \DJokić V, Milosavljević M, Mitrić M, Perić-Grujić AA, Onjia AE, et al. Ultrasonic assisted arsenate adsorption on solvothermally synthesized calcite modified by goethite, α-MnO2 and goethite/α-MnO2. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2014;21(2):790–801.
• 31. Roosta M, Ghaedi M, Shokri N, Daneshfar A, Sahraei R, Asghari A. Optimization of the combined ultrasonic assisted/adsorption method for the removal of malachite green by gold nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: experimental design. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2014;118:55–65.
• 32. Jacques RA, Bernardi R, Caovila M, Lima EC, Pavan FA, Vaghetti JC, et al. Removal of Cu (II), Fe (III), and Cr (III) from aqueous solution by aniline grafted silica gel. Separation Science and Technology. 2007;42(3):591–609.
• 33. Bagheri AR, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Bazrafshan AA, Jannesar R. Comparative study on ultrasonic assisted adsorption of dyes from single system onto Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: experimental design methodology. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2017;34:294–304.
• 34. Zare-Dorabei R, Ferdowsi S, Barzin A, Tadjarodi A. Highly efficient simultaneous ultrasonic-assisted adsorption of Pb (II), Cd (II), Ni (II) and Cu (II) ions from aqueous solutions by graphene oxide modified with 2, 2′-dipyridylamine: central composite design optimization. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2016;2016(32):265–76.
• 35. Hamza W, Dammak N, Hadjltaief H, Eloussaief M, Benzina M. Sono-assisted adsorption of cristal violet dye onto tunisian smectite clay: Characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2018;2018(163):365–71.
• 36. Gülen J, Akın B, Özgür M. Ultrasonic-assisted adsorption of methylene blue on sumac leaves. Desalination and water treatment. 2016;20(57):9286–95.
• 37. Demirbas E, Kobya M, Konukman A. Error analysis of equilibrium studies for the almond shell activated carbon adsorption of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions. Journal of hazardous materials. 2008;1–3(154):787–94.
• 38. Karakuş S. A Novel ZnO Nanoparticle as Drug Nanocarrier in Therapeutic Applications: Kinetic Models and Error Analysis. JOTCSA. 2019;6(2):119–32.
• 39. Amin M, Chetpattananondh P, Khan M. Ultrasound assisted adsorption of reactive dye-145 by biochars from marine Chlorella sp. extracted solid waste pyrolyzed at various temperatures. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2009;16(4):557–63.
• 40. Milenković DD, Dašić PV, Veljković VB. Ultrasound-assisted adsorption of copper(II) ions on hazelnut shell activated carbon. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2009 ;16(4):557–63.
• 41. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Goudarzi A, Rajabi M. Response surface methodology approach for optimization of simultaneous dye and metal ion ultrasound-assisted adsorption onto Mn doped Fe 3 O 4 -NPs loaded on AC: kinetic and isothermal studies. Dalton Trans. 2015;44(33):14707–23.
• 42. Wu Y, Han Y, Tao Y, Fan S, Chu D-T, Ye X, et al. Ultrasound assisted adsorption and desorption of blueberry anthocyanins using macroporous resins. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2018;48:311–20.
• 43. Sirajudheen P, Nikitha MR, Karthikeyan P, Meenakshi S. Perceptive removal of toxic azo dyes from water using magnetic Fe3O4 reinforced graphene oxide–carboxymethyl cellulose recyclable composite: Adsorption investigation of parametric studies and their mechanisms. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2020;100648.
• 44. Noreen S, Mustafa G, Ibrahim SM, Naz S, Iqbal M, Yaseen M, et al. Iron oxide (Fe2O3) prepared via green route and adsorption efficiency evaluation for an anionic dye: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics studies. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2020;9(3):4206–17.
• 45. Jamshidi M, Ghaedi M, Dashtian K, Hajati S, Bazrafshan AA. Sonochemical assisted hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO: Cr nanoparticles loaded activated carbon for simultaneous ultrasound-assisted adsorption of ternary toxic organic dye: Derivative spectrophotometric, optimization, kinetic and isotherm study. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2016;32:119–31.
• 46. Wen Z, Huang K, Niu Y, Yao Y, Wang S, Cao Z, et al. Kinetic study of ultrasonic-assisted uranium adsorption by anion exchange resin. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2020;585:124021.
• 47. Wei J, Xu J, Mei Y, Tan Q. Chloride adsorption on aminobenzoate intercalated layered double hydroxides: Kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies. Applied Clay Science. 2020;187:105495.
• 48. Şentürk İ, Alzein M. Adsorptive removal of basic blue 41 using pistachio shell adsorbent - Performance in batch and column system. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy. 2020;16:100254.
• 49. Afshin S, Mokhtari SA, Vosoughi M, Sadeghi H, Rashtbari Y. Data of adsorption of Basic Blue 41 dye from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from filamentous algae. Data in Brief. 2018;21:1008–13.
• 50. Nouri L, Hemidouche S, Boudjemaa A, Kaouah F, Sadaoui Z, Bachari K. Elaboration and characterization of photobiocomposite beads, based on titanium (IV) oxide and sodium alginate biopolymer, for basic blue 41 adsorption/photocatalytic degradation. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;151:66–84.
• 51. Benvenuti J, Fisch A, dos Santos JHZ, Gutterres M. Silica-based adsorbent material with grape bagasse encapsulated by the sol-gel method for the adsorption of Basic Blue 41 dye. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2019;7(5):103342.
• 52. Kooli F, Yan L, Al-Faze R, Al-Sehimi A. Removal enhancement of basic blue 41 by brick waste from an aqueous solution. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2015;8(3):333–42.
• 53. Humelnicu I, Băiceanu A, Ignat M-E, Dulman V. The removal of Basic Blue 41 textile dye from aqueous solution by adsorption onto natural zeolitic tuff: Kinetics and thermodynamics. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2017;105:274–87.
• 54. Zarezadeh-Mehrizi M, Badiei A. Highly efficient removal of basic blue 41 with nanoporous silica. Water Resources and Industry. 2014;5:49–57.