Yıl 2020, Cilt 3 , Sayı 2, Sayfalar 55 - 64 2020-11-30

Energy and Exergy Analysis on Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Aspen Plus Simulation

Senem SEZER [1] , Uğur ÖZVEREN [2]


Bubbling fluidized bed gasifier has many advantages for biomass gasification process. In this study, exergy and energy analysis were investigated for gasification of almond shell in bubbling fluidized bed gasifier by using Aspen Plus simulation. Aspen Plus works based on principle of Gibbs free energy minimization. The effect of temperature and steam/fuel ratio, which are important parameters for the gasification process, on energy and physical exergy values of syngas were examined. The results of the simulation showed that the exergy and energy values of the syngas were significantly affected by the change in gasifier temperature and steam/fuel ratio. Increasing the steam/fuel ratio influenced the energy and exergy value negatively. However, H2 and CO compositions in the syngas and energy and exergy values of the syngas increased with the enhancement of temperature. The developed bubbling fluidized bed gasifier model will create knowledge for researchers interested in the gasifier process.
gasification, bubbling fluidized bed gasifier, energy and exergy analysis, Aspen Plus, biomass
  • 1. Siddiqui O, Dincer I, Yilbas B. Development of a novel renewable energy system integrated with biomass gasification combined cycle for cleaner production purposes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019:118345.
  • 2. Rodríguez-Monroy C, Mármol-Acitores G, Nilsson-Cifuentes G. Electricity generation in Chile using non-conventional renewable energy sources–A focus on biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;81:937-45.
  • 3. Moilanen A, Nasrullah M, Kurkela E. The effect of biomass feedstock type and process parameters on achieving the total carbon conversion in the large scale fluidized bed gasification of biomass. Environmental progress & sustainable energy. 2009;28(3):355-9.
  • 4. Hosseini M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Steam and air fed biomass gasification: comparisons based on energy and exergy. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2012;37(21):16446-52.
  • 5. Udomsirichakorn J, Salam PA. Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: the prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2014;30:565-79.
  • 6. Sansaniwal S, Rosen M, Tyagi S. Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: an overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;80:23-43.
  • 7. Mazaheri N, Akbarzadeh A, Madadian E, Lefsrud M. Systematic review of research guidelines for numerical simulation of biomass gasification for bioenergy production. Energy conversion and management. 2019;183:671-88.
  • 8. Bach Q-V, Gye H-R, Lee C-J. Process modeling for steam biomass gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. 44: Elsevier; 2018. p. 343-8.
  • 9. Kwofie E, Ngadi M, Sotocinal S. Thermodynamic evaluation of a rice husk fired integrated steam and hot air generation unit for rice parboiling. Energy. 2017;128:39-49.
  • 10. Kanoglu M, Işık SK, Abuşogˇlu A. Performance characteristics of a diesel engine power plant. Energy Conversion and Management. 2005;46(11-12):1692-702.
  • 11. Kanoglu M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Understanding energy and exergy efficiencies for improved energy management in power plants. Energy Policy. 2007;35(7):3967-78.
  • 12. Dincer I, Hussain M, Al‐Zaharnah I. Analysis of sectoral energy and exergy use of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Energy Research. 2004;28(3):205-43.
  • 13. Nemtsov D, Zabaniotou A. Mathematical modelling and simulation approaches of agricultural residues air gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2008;143(1-3):10-31.
  • 14. Gómez-Barea A, Leckner B. Modeling of biomass gasification in fluidized bed. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2010;36(4):444-509.
  • 15. Couto N, Rouboa A, Silva V, Monteiro E, Bouziane K. Influence of the biomass gasification processes on the final composition of syngas. Energy Procedia. 2013;36:596-606.
  • 16. Beheshti S, Ghassemi H, Shahsavan-Markadeh R. Process simulation of biomass gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Energy conversion and management. 2015;94:345-52.
  • 17. Begum S, Rasul M, Akbar D, Ramzan N. Performance analysis of an integrated fixed bed gasifier model for different biomass feedstocks. Energies. 2013;6(12):6508-24.
  • 18. Quesada L, Pérez A, Calero M, Blazquez G, Martín-Lara M. Reaction schemes for estimating kinetic parameters of thermal decomposition of native and metal-loaded almond shell. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2018;118:234-44.
  • 19. NREL Transforming Energy [Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/rredc/biomass_resource.html.
  • 20. AlNouss A, McKay G, Al-Ansari T. A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products. Energy Conversion and Management. 2019;196:664-76.
  • 21. Motta IL, Miranda NT, Maciel Filho R, Maciel MRW. Sugarcane bagasse gasification: Simulation and analysis of different operating parameters, fluidizing media, and gasifier types. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019;122:433-45.
  • 22. Karatas H, Olgun H, Akgun F. Experimental results of gasification of waste tire with air&CO2, air&steam and steam in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. Fuel processing technology. 2012;102:166-74.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Mühendislik, Kimya
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-1732-4840
Yazar: Senem SEZER
Kurum: Marmara University
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-3790-0606
Yazar: Uğur ÖZVEREN (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: Marmara University
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Başvuru Tarihi : 16 Aralık 2019
Kabul Tarihi : 13 Kasım 2020
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 30 Kasım 2020

Vancouver Sezer S , Özveren U . Energy and Exergy Analysis on Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Aspen Plus Simulation. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering. 2020; 3(2): 55-64.