Year 2021,
Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 12, 31.05.2021
Açelya Seçer
,
Ertürk Şayan
Şefika Türker Üzden
Arif Hasan
Supporting Institution
Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Proje Birimi
Project Number
FBA-2017-9823
References
- 1. Omer AM. Energy, environmOmer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9), 2265–2300. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001ent and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;
- 2. Dunn S. Hydrogen futures: Toward a sustainable energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;
- 3. Ni M, Leung DYC, Leung MKH, Sumathy K. An overview of hydrogen production from biomass. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;
- 4. Alauddin ZABZ, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR. Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010.
- 5. Onwudili JA, Williams PT. Hydrothermal gasification and oxidation as effective flameless conversion technologies for organic wastes. J Energy Inst. 2008;
- 6. Kruse A. Hydrothermal biomass gasification. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2009. 7. Elliott DC. Catalytic hydrothermal gasification of biomass. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2008.
- 8. Azadi P, Farnood R. Review of heterogeneous catalysts for sub- and supercritical water gasification of biomass and wastes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011.
- 9. Osada M, Sato T, Watanabe M, Shirai M, Arai K. Catalytic gasification of wood biomass in subcritical and supercritical water. Combust Sci Technol. 2006;178(1–3):537–52.
- 10. Cortright RD, Davda RR, Dumesic JA. Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature. 2002; 11. Kruse A, Dahmen N. Hydrothermal biomass conversion: Quo vadis? J Supercrit Fluids. 2018;
- 12. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments Eighth Edition. Design. 2012.
- 13. Box G, Draper N. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, 1st Edition. Wiley Ser Probab Math statics, ISBN 978-0471810339. 1987;
- 14. Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics. 1960;
- 15. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandão GC, et al. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2007.
- 16. Wu H, Hanna MA, Jones DD. Fluidized-bed gasification of dairy manure by Box-Behnken design. Waste Manag Res. 2012;
- 17. Bazargan A, Bazargan M, McKay G. Optimization of rice husk pretreatment for energy production. Renew Energy. 2015;
- 18. Inayat M, Sulaiman SA, Kurnia JC. Catalytic co-gasification of coconut shells and oil palm fronds blends in the presence of cement, dolomite, and limestone: Parametric optimization via Box Behnken Design. J Energy Inst. 2019;
- 19. Samiee-Zafarghandi R, Karimi-Sabet J, Abdoli MA, Karbassi A. Supercritical water gasification of microalga Chlorella PTCC 6010 for hydrogen production: Box-Behnken optimization and evaluating catalytic effect of MnO 2 /SiO 2 and NiO/SiO 2. Renew Energy. 2018;
- 20. Hesenov A, Atanur OM, Erbatur O, Irmak S, Meryemoglu B. Aqueous-phase reforming of biomass using various types of supported precious metal and raney-nickel catalysts for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010.
- 21. Tükel S, Sahin PB, Yildirim D. Optimization of lipase-catalyzed synthesis of fructose stearate using response surface methodology. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 2013;
Evaluation of the Process Parameters on Subcritical Water Gasification of Sorghum by Response Surface Methodology
Year 2021,
Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 12, 31.05.2021
Açelya Seçer
,
Ertürk Şayan
Şefika Türker Üzden
Arif Hasan
Abstract
In this study
response surface methodology (RSM) with Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to
evaluate the effects of process parameters of reaction time, initial water
volume, amount of feedstock and amount of catalyst on total gasification and
hydrogen production yield by low temperature hydrothermal gasification of Sorghum
biomass at 250°C. Ruthenium (III) chloride was used as a catalyst in catalytic
runs. Significances of the main and interacting effects of independent
parameters were determined by ANOVA. Numerical optimization was used to
optimize the process parameters for maximum yield hydrogen production. The
optimum conditions for maximum hydrogen production were determined as a residence
time of 58.6 min, water volume of 24.5 mL and catalyst amount of 0.02g.
Project Number
FBA-2017-9823
References
- 1. Omer AM. Energy, environmOmer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9), 2265–2300. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001ent and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;
- 2. Dunn S. Hydrogen futures: Toward a sustainable energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;
- 3. Ni M, Leung DYC, Leung MKH, Sumathy K. An overview of hydrogen production from biomass. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;
- 4. Alauddin ZABZ, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR. Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010.
- 5. Onwudili JA, Williams PT. Hydrothermal gasification and oxidation as effective flameless conversion technologies for organic wastes. J Energy Inst. 2008;
- 6. Kruse A. Hydrothermal biomass gasification. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2009. 7. Elliott DC. Catalytic hydrothermal gasification of biomass. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2008.
- 8. Azadi P, Farnood R. Review of heterogeneous catalysts for sub- and supercritical water gasification of biomass and wastes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011.
- 9. Osada M, Sato T, Watanabe M, Shirai M, Arai K. Catalytic gasification of wood biomass in subcritical and supercritical water. Combust Sci Technol. 2006;178(1–3):537–52.
- 10. Cortright RD, Davda RR, Dumesic JA. Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature. 2002; 11. Kruse A, Dahmen N. Hydrothermal biomass conversion: Quo vadis? J Supercrit Fluids. 2018;
- 12. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments Eighth Edition. Design. 2012.
- 13. Box G, Draper N. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, 1st Edition. Wiley Ser Probab Math statics, ISBN 978-0471810339. 1987;
- 14. Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics. 1960;
- 15. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandão GC, et al. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2007.
- 16. Wu H, Hanna MA, Jones DD. Fluidized-bed gasification of dairy manure by Box-Behnken design. Waste Manag Res. 2012;
- 17. Bazargan A, Bazargan M, McKay G. Optimization of rice husk pretreatment for energy production. Renew Energy. 2015;
- 18. Inayat M, Sulaiman SA, Kurnia JC. Catalytic co-gasification of coconut shells and oil palm fronds blends in the presence of cement, dolomite, and limestone: Parametric optimization via Box Behnken Design. J Energy Inst. 2019;
- 19. Samiee-Zafarghandi R, Karimi-Sabet J, Abdoli MA, Karbassi A. Supercritical water gasification of microalga Chlorella PTCC 6010 for hydrogen production: Box-Behnken optimization and evaluating catalytic effect of MnO 2 /SiO 2 and NiO/SiO 2. Renew Energy. 2018;
- 20. Hesenov A, Atanur OM, Erbatur O, Irmak S, Meryemoglu B. Aqueous-phase reforming of biomass using various types of supported precious metal and raney-nickel catalysts for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010.
- 21. Tükel S, Sahin PB, Yildirim D. Optimization of lipase-catalyzed synthesis of fructose stearate using response surface methodology. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 2013;