Yıl 2019, Cilt 2 , Sayı 2, Sayfalar 87 - 94 2019-12-16

CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness

Ayça GÜLTEN [1]


In this study it is aimed to analyze the relation between CO2 emissions of fuel over insulation materials and insulation thickness. For this purpose optimum insulation thickness for different building structural elements such as ground floor, external insulated wall and flat roof have been determined for four insulation materials (as rockwool, glasswool, extruded polystrene and expanded polystren) and their CO2 emissions have also been presented in comparison with fuel consumption, annual cost and total cost savings. Calculations were made for five chosen (Antalya, İstanbul, Ankara, Sivas, Erzurum) cities that represent the different climatic regions of Turkey. Degree-Day Method has been used for optimum insulation calculations including heating and cooling periods while present worth factor has been calculated over 10 years. Lowest CO2 emission results were obtained with rockwool considering external walls for the insulation thicknesses calculated due to both of heating+cooling loads while worst results were obtained for XPS. Glasswool and EPS also followed rockwool in terms of their lower CO2 emission values. Erzurum presented the highest CO2 emission values caused by it’s amount of fuel consumption while CO2 emission values decreased with incresing insulation thickness for provinces.
Optimum insulation thickness, CO2 emission, insulation material, energy saving
  • [1] Kürekçi, N.A., Determination of insulation thickness for building walls by using heating and cooling degree-day values of all Turkey’s provincial centers, Energy and Buildings. 2016, 118,197-213.
  • [2] Ucar A, Balo F. Effect of fuel type on the optimum thickness of selected insulation materials for the four different climatic regions of Turkey. Appl Energy 2009;86(5):730–6.
  • [3] Bolatturk A. Determination of optimum insulation thickness or building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Appl. Thermal Eng. 2006;26:1301–9.
  • [4] Bektaş Ekici, B., Aytaç Gülten, A.,Aksoy U.T. A study on the optimum insulation thicknesses of various types of external walls with respect to different materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey, Applied Energy, 2012, 92; 211-217.
  • [5] Aytaç, A., Aksoy, U.T. The relation between optimum insulation thickness and heating cost on external walls for energy saving, 2006, J.Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi University, Vol: 21,No:4, 753-758.
  • [6] Fodoup, F., Vincelas, C., Ghislain, T., “The determination of the most economical combination between external wall and the optimum insulation material in Cameroonian's buildings”, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 9, January 2017, Pages 155-163.
  • [7] Liu, X., Chen, Y., Ge, H., Fazio, P., Chen, G., Guo, X., Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with moisture transfer in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Energy and Buildings, 109 (2015) 361-368.
  • [8] Cuce, E., Cuce, P. M., Wood, C. J., Riffat, S. B.. Optimizing insulation thickness and analysing environmental impacts of aerogel-based thermal superinsulation in buildings, Energy and Buildings, 77 (2014) 28-39.
  • [10] Guven S. Calculation of optimum insulation thickness of external walls in residential buildings by using exergetic life cycle cost assessment method: Case study for Turkey. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy.. 2019;e13232.
  • [11] Ashouri,M., Fatemeh Razi Astaraei, F.R., Ghasempour,R., Ahmadi, M. H., Feidt,M., Optimum insulation thickness determination of a building wall using exergetic life cycle assessment, Applied Thermal Engineering, 106 (2016) 307-305.
  • [12] O. Arslan , M. A. Ozgur , H. D. Yildizay & R. Kose (2009) Fuel Effects on Optimum Insulation Thickness: An Exergitic Approach, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 32:2, 128-147.
  • [13] Dombayci, Ö. A., Atalay, Ö., Ş. G., Acar, Ulu, E. Y. Ozturk, H. K. Thermoeconomic method for determination of optimum insulation thickness of external walls for the houses: Case study for Turkey, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 22(2017)1-8.
  • [14] Kon, O., Calculation of fuel consumption and emissions in buildings based on external walls and windows using economic optimization, Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 33:1 (2018) 101-113.
  • [15] Evin, D., Uçar A., Energy impact and eco-efficiency of the envelope insulation in residential buildings in Turkey, Applied Thermal Engineering, 154 (2019) 573–584.
  • [16] Gülten, A., Determination of optimum insulation thickness using the entransy based thermoeconomic and environmental analysis: a case study for Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. Published online: 01 August 2019
Birincil Dil en
Konular Malzeme Bilimleri, Ortak Disiplinler
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Ayça GÜLTEN (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: FIRAT UNIVERSITY
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Başvuru Tarihi : 12 Kasım 2019
Kabul Tarihi : 9 Aralık 2019
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 16 Aralık 2019

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { jphcfum645652, journal = {Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials}, issn = {2651-3080}, eissn = {2651-3080}, address = {}, publisher = {Niyazi BULUT}, year = {2019}, volume = {2}, pages = {87 - 94}, doi = {}, title = {CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness}, key = {cite}, author = {Gülten, Ayça} }
APA Gülten, A . (2019). CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness . Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials , 2 (2) , 87-94 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jphcfum/issue/50562/645652
MLA Gülten, A . "CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness" . Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2 (2019 ): 87-94 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jphcfum/issue/50562/645652>
Chicago Gülten, A . "CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness". Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2 (2019 ): 87-94
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness AU - Ayça Gülten Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - DO - T2 - Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 87 EP - 94 VL - 2 IS - 2 SN - 2651-3080-2651-3080 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness %A Ayça Gülten %T CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness %D 2019 %J Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials %P 2651-3080-2651-3080 %V 2 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Gülten, Ayça . "CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness". Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2 / 2 (Aralık 2019): 87-94 .
AMA Gülten A . CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials. 2019; 2(2): 87-94.
Vancouver Gülten A . CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials. 2019; 2(2): 87-94.