Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 87 - 94, 16.12.2019

Abstract

References

  • [1] Kürekçi, N.A., Determination of insulation thickness for building walls by using heating and cooling degree-day values of all Turkey’s provincial centers, Energy and Buildings. 2016, 118,197-213.
  • [2] Ucar A, Balo F. Effect of fuel type on the optimum thickness of selected insulation materials for the four different climatic regions of Turkey. Appl Energy 2009;86(5):730–6.
  • [3] Bolatturk A. Determination of optimum insulation thickness or building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Appl. Thermal Eng. 2006;26:1301–9.
  • [4] Bektaş Ekici, B., Aytaç Gülten, A.,Aksoy U.T. A study on the optimum insulation thicknesses of various types of external walls with respect to different materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey, Applied Energy, 2012, 92; 211-217.
  • [5] Aytaç, A., Aksoy, U.T. The relation between optimum insulation thickness and heating cost on external walls for energy saving, 2006, J.Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi University, Vol: 21,No:4, 753-758.
  • [6] Fodoup, F., Vincelas, C., Ghislain, T., “The determination of the most economical combination between external wall and the optimum insulation material in Cameroonian's buildings”, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 9, January 2017, Pages 155-163.
  • [7] Liu, X., Chen, Y., Ge, H., Fazio, P., Chen, G., Guo, X., Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with moisture transfer in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Energy and Buildings, 109 (2015) 361-368.
  • [8] Cuce, E., Cuce, P. M., Wood, C. J., Riffat, S. B.. Optimizing insulation thickness and analysing environmental impacts of aerogel-based thermal superinsulation in buildings, Energy and Buildings, 77 (2014) 28-39.
  • [10] Guven S. Calculation of optimum insulation thickness of external walls in residential buildings by using exergetic life cycle cost assessment method: Case study for Turkey. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy.. 2019;e13232.
  • [11] Ashouri,M., Fatemeh Razi Astaraei, F.R., Ghasempour,R., Ahmadi, M. H., Feidt,M., Optimum insulation thickness determination of a building wall using exergetic life cycle assessment, Applied Thermal Engineering, 106 (2016) 307-305.
  • [12] O. Arslan , M. A. Ozgur , H. D. Yildizay & R. Kose (2009) Fuel Effects on Optimum Insulation Thickness: An Exergitic Approach, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 32:2, 128-147.
  • [13] Dombayci, Ö. A., Atalay, Ö., Ş. G., Acar, Ulu, E. Y. Ozturk, H. K. Thermoeconomic method for determination of optimum insulation thickness of external walls for the houses: Case study for Turkey, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 22(2017)1-8.
  • [14] Kon, O., Calculation of fuel consumption and emissions in buildings based on external walls and windows using economic optimization, Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 33:1 (2018) 101-113.
  • [15] Evin, D., Uçar A., Energy impact and eco-efficiency of the envelope insulation in residential buildings in Turkey, Applied Thermal Engineering, 154 (2019) 573–584.
  • [16] Gülten, A., Determination of optimum insulation thickness using the entransy based thermoeconomic and environmental analysis: a case study for Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. Published online: 01 August 2019

CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 87 - 94, 16.12.2019

Abstract

In this study it is aimed to analyze the relation between CO2
emissions of fuel over insulation materials and insulation thickness. For this
purpose optimum insulation thickness for different building structural elements
such as ground floor, external insulated wall and flat roof have been
determined for four insulation materials (as rockwool, glasswool, extruded
polystrene and expanded polystren) and their CO2 emissions have also
been presented in comparison with fuel consumption, annual cost and total cost
savings. Calculations were made for five chosen (Antalya, İstanbul, Ankara,
Sivas, Erzurum) cities that represent the different climatic regions of Turkey.
Degree-Day Method has been used for optimum insulation calculations including
heating and cooling periods while present worth factor has been calculated over
10 years. Lowest CO2 emission results were obtained with rockwool considering
external walls for the insulation thicknesses calculated due to both of
heating+cooling loads while worst results were obtained for XPS. Glasswool and
EPS also followed rockwool in terms of their lower CO2 emission
values. Erzurum presented the highest CO2 emission values caused by
it’s amount of fuel consumption while CO2 emission values decreased
with incresing insulation thickness for provinces.

References

  • [1] Kürekçi, N.A., Determination of insulation thickness for building walls by using heating and cooling degree-day values of all Turkey’s provincial centers, Energy and Buildings. 2016, 118,197-213.
  • [2] Ucar A, Balo F. Effect of fuel type on the optimum thickness of selected insulation materials for the four different climatic regions of Turkey. Appl Energy 2009;86(5):730–6.
  • [3] Bolatturk A. Determination of optimum insulation thickness or building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Appl. Thermal Eng. 2006;26:1301–9.
  • [4] Bektaş Ekici, B., Aytaç Gülten, A.,Aksoy U.T. A study on the optimum insulation thicknesses of various types of external walls with respect to different materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey, Applied Energy, 2012, 92; 211-217.
  • [5] Aytaç, A., Aksoy, U.T. The relation between optimum insulation thickness and heating cost on external walls for energy saving, 2006, J.Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi University, Vol: 21,No:4, 753-758.
  • [6] Fodoup, F., Vincelas, C., Ghislain, T., “The determination of the most economical combination between external wall and the optimum insulation material in Cameroonian's buildings”, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 9, January 2017, Pages 155-163.
  • [7] Liu, X., Chen, Y., Ge, H., Fazio, P., Chen, G., Guo, X., Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with moisture transfer in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Energy and Buildings, 109 (2015) 361-368.
  • [8] Cuce, E., Cuce, P. M., Wood, C. J., Riffat, S. B.. Optimizing insulation thickness and analysing environmental impacts of aerogel-based thermal superinsulation in buildings, Energy and Buildings, 77 (2014) 28-39.
  • [10] Guven S. Calculation of optimum insulation thickness of external walls in residential buildings by using exergetic life cycle cost assessment method: Case study for Turkey. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy.. 2019;e13232.
  • [11] Ashouri,M., Fatemeh Razi Astaraei, F.R., Ghasempour,R., Ahmadi, M. H., Feidt,M., Optimum insulation thickness determination of a building wall using exergetic life cycle assessment, Applied Thermal Engineering, 106 (2016) 307-305.
  • [12] O. Arslan , M. A. Ozgur , H. D. Yildizay & R. Kose (2009) Fuel Effects on Optimum Insulation Thickness: An Exergitic Approach, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 32:2, 128-147.
  • [13] Dombayci, Ö. A., Atalay, Ö., Ş. G., Acar, Ulu, E. Y. Ozturk, H. K. Thermoeconomic method for determination of optimum insulation thickness of external walls for the houses: Case study for Turkey, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 22(2017)1-8.
  • [14] Kon, O., Calculation of fuel consumption and emissions in buildings based on external walls and windows using economic optimization, Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 33:1 (2018) 101-113.
  • [15] Evin, D., Uçar A., Energy impact and eco-efficiency of the envelope insulation in residential buildings in Turkey, Applied Thermal Engineering, 154 (2019) 573–584.
  • [16] Gülten, A., Determination of optimum insulation thickness using the entransy based thermoeconomic and environmental analysis: a case study for Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. Published online: 01 August 2019
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Material Production Technologies
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ayça Gülten

Publication Date December 16, 2019
Submission Date November 12, 2019
Acceptance Date December 9, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gülten, A. (2019). CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, 2(2), 87-94.
AMA Gülten A. CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials. December 2019;2(2):87-94.
Chicago Gülten, Ayça. “CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness”. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2, no. 2 (December 2019): 87-94.
EndNote Gülten A (December 1, 2019) CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2 2 87–94.
IEEE A. Gülten, “CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness”, Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2019.
ISNAD Gülten, Ayça. “CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness”. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2/2 (December 2019), 87-94.
JAMA Gülten A. CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials. 2019;2:87–94.
MLA Gülten, Ayça. “CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness”. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, vol. 2, no. 2, 2019, pp. 87-94.
Vancouver Gülten A. CO2 Emission and Cost Analysis for Different Building Elements and Insulation Materials Based on Optimum Insulation Thickness. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials. 2019;2(2):87-94.