Effects of environmental enrichment on ostrich behaviours

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the behavioural differences of ostrich (Struthio camelus) breeders reared under environmental enrichment with natural vegetation in farm conditions. The effect of enriched environment with vegetation on eating, drinking, foraging, pecking, defecation, walking, running, alert, standing, sitting, sleeping, dust bathing, preening, head shake, thermoregulation, kantel, mating, laying, threat and fight behaviours of ostriches were found similar (P > 0.05). The ratio of boom, courtship and displace behaviours were found higher in enriched than in gravel floor (P=0.050; P=0.028 and P=0.001). The foraging, dust bathing, boom, laying and displace behaviours of ostriches were affected by gender (P=0.029, P=0.040, P=0.050, P=0.025 and P=0.001). The eating, foraging, standing, sitting, dust bathing and laying behaviours of ostriches were affected by time of day (P=0.010, P=0.023, P=0.049, P=0.026, P=0.018 and P=0.009). There was a significant interaction of enriched environment and gender effect on eating, standing, boom and displace behaviours of ostriches (P=0.047, P=0.031, P=0.050 and P=0.001). The pecking and standing behaviours of ostriches were affected by enriched environment and time of day interaction (P=0.027 and P=0.023). As a conclusion, enriched environment with natural vegetation in paddock only affected ostriches’ courtship behaviours, also affected male and female eating and standing behaviours differently.

Keywords

• Environmental enrichment
• Vegetation
• Ostrich
• Behaviour
• Gender

References

1. Ahmed, F.A.M. & Salih R.R.M. (2012). Some behavioral traits of red neck ostrich under captive conditions. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology,3(2),117. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000117.
2. Aravinth, A. & Selvan S.T. (2015). Breeding Behavioural Pattern in Ostrich a Key for Better Management for its Reproductive Life. Indian journal of applied research, 5(12), 289-291.
3. Almeida, de G. F., Hinrichsen, L. K., Horsted, K., Thamsborg, S.M. & Hermansen, J.E. (2012). Feed intake and activity level of two broiler genotypes foraging different types of vegetation in the finishing period. Poultry Science,91,2105–2113. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02187
4. Amado, M.F., Xavier, D.B., Boere, V., Torres-Pereira, C., McManus, C. & Bernal, F.E.M. (2011). Behaviour of captive Ostrich chicks from 10 days to 5 months of age. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia,40(7),1613-1618. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000700029.
5. Bertram, B.C.R. (1992). The Ostrich Communal Nesting System. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
6. Brassó, L.D., Béri, B. & Komlósi, I. (2020). Studies on Ostrich (Struthio camelus) – Review. Acta agraria Debreceniensis, 2020-1, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.34101/actaagrar/1/3772.
7. Carvalho, T.S.G., Saad, C.E.P., Alvarenga, R.R., Ferreira, W.M., Assis, V.D.L., Pereira, V.M., Scalon, J.D., Silva, J.P. & Zangeronimo, M.G. (2017). Use of collard green stalks as environmental enrichment for
8. cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) kept in captivity. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 69(3),718-724. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8988.

9. Christensen, J.W. & Nielsen, B.L. (2004). Environmetal enrichment for ostrich, struthio camelus, chicks. Animal welfare, 13(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600026853
10. Cooper, R.G. (2000). Management of ostrich (Struthio camelus) chicks. World’s poultry Science jpurnal,56(1),33-44. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20000004.
11. Cooper, R.G., Horbanzuk, J.O., Villegas-Vizcaino, R., Kennoui Sebai, S., Mohammed, A.E.F. & Mahrose, K.M.A. (2010). Wild ostrich (Struthio camelus) ecology and physiology. Tropical Animal Health and
12. Production, 42(3),363–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9428-2.
13. Csermely, D., Gaibani, G. & Dardani, E. (2007). Year-round behavioural sequences in captive ostrich Struthio camelus domesticus pairs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 103(1-2),156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.018.
14. Dal Bosco, A., Mugnai, C., Rosati, A., Paoletti,A., Caporali, S. & Castellini, C. (2014). Effect of range enrichment on performance, behavior and forage intake of free-range chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(2),137–145. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00814.
15. Dawkins, M.S., Cook, P.A., Whittingham, M.J., Mansell, K.A. & Harper, A.E. (2003). What makes free-range broiler chickens range? In situ measurement of habitat preference. Animal Behaviour, 66(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2172.
16. Deeming, D.C. (1998). A note on effects of gender and time of day on the winter time-activity budget of adult ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a farming environment. Applied Animal Behaviour
17. Science, 59(4), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00090-2.
18. Deeming, D.C. (1999). The Ostrich: Biology, Production and Health. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 358 p.
19. Deeming, D.C. & Bubier, N.E. (1999). Behaviour in Natural and Captive Environments. In: Deeming, D.C. (Ed) The Ostrich: Biology, Production and Health. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp.83-104. Fericean, L.M., Ostan, M., Rada, O.A., Ivan, M., Prunar, Prunar, F. & Bănăţean-Dunea, I. (2022). Observation on social behaviour of ostrich (Struthio camelus) in captivity. Scientific Papers. Series D.
20. Animal Science, LXV(2),473-478.
21. Jones, R.B. & Waddington, D. (1993). Attenuation of the domestic chicks; fear of human beings via regular handling: In search of a sensitive period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 36(2-3),185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90009-E.
22. Jones, T., Feber, R., Hemery, G., Cook., P., James, K., Lamberth, C. & Dawkins, M. (2007). Welfare and environmental benefits of integrating commercially viable free-range broiler chickens into newly planted woodland: A UK case study. Agricultural Systems, 94(2),177– 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.007.
23. Hambali, K., Zakaria N., Fauzi, N. & Amir, A. (2015). Behaviour of Captive Ostriches (Struthio camelus) at Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Bachok Campus, Kelantan, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science, 3: 13-17. https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v3i2.523.
24. King, C.E. (1999). Environmental enrichment and bird welfare. In: Adams, N.J. & Slotow, R.H. (eds) Procedings of 22 International Ornithology Congress, Durban: 886-895. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Africa.
25. Kistner, C. (2019). Ostrich production today: the (eco)logical way to economic success. Lohmann Information, 53(1), 16-22.
26. Kock, J.A. (1996a). Artificial rearing of chickens. In: Deeming, D.C. (Ed.) Guidelines for successful ostrich farming. Oudtshoorn: Little Karoo Agricultural Development Centre, p.18-23.
27. Kock, J.A. (1996b). Natural rearing of chickens up to three months of age. In: Deeming, D.C. (Ed.) Guidelines for successful ostrich farming. Oudtshoorn: Little Karoo Agricultural Development Centre, p.24-27.
28. Lima, M.F.F., de Azevedo, C.S., Young, R.J. & Viau, P. (2019). Impacts of food-based enrichment on behaviour and physiology of male greater rheas (Rhea Americana, Rheidae, Aves). Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 59,e20195911. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.11.
29. Lubac, S., & Mirabito, L. (2001). Relationship between the activities of ‘Red Label’ type chickens in an outdoor run and external factors. British Poultry Science, 42(suppl.),S14-S15.
30. Maloney, S.K. (2008). Thermoregulation in ratites: A review. Australian journal of experimental agriculture,48(10),1293-1301. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08142.
31. Mitlöhner, F.M., Morrow-Tesch, J.L., Wilson, S.C., Dailey, J.W. & McGlone, J.J. (2001). Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 79(5), 1189-1193. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7951189x.
32. Mirabito, L., Joly, T. & Lubac, S. (2001). Impact of the presence of peach tree orchards in the outdoor hens runs on the occupation of the space by red Label type chickens. British Poultry Science, 42(Suppl.),S18–S19.
33. Mukhtar, N., Gazala, M. & Waseem, M. (2017). Understanding of Social and Mating Behaviour of Ostrich (Struthio camelus). Journal of World's Poultry Research, 7(2), 72-78.
34. Mutiga, M., Muoria, P.K., Kotut, K. & Karuri, H.W. (2016). Behavioural Patterns and Responses to Human Disturbances of Wild Somali Ostriches (Struthio molybdophanes) In Samburu, Kenya. International journal of current advanced research,4(8),495-502. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/1239.
35. Muvhali, P.T. (2018). Improving ostrich welfare by developing positive human-animal interactions. Stellenbosch University Master Science Thessis, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
36. Newberry, R.C. (1995). Environmental enrichment − increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science,44,229–243. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex344.
37. Riber, A.B., van de Weerd, H.A., de Jong, I.C. & Steenfeldt, S. (2018). Review of environmental enrichment for broiler chickens. Poultry Science,97,378–396. https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex344.
38. Sambraus, H.H. (1994). Das sexualverhalten des Afrikanischen Staußes (Struthio camelus). (The sexual behavior of the African ostrich (Struthio camelus)). Tierärztliche Praxis, 22(6),538–541. SAS (2019). A User’s Guide to SAS V9.4.M6. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., USA.
39. Stadig, L.M., Rodenburg, T.B., Ampe, B., Reubens, B. & Tuyttens, F.A.M. (2017). Effects of shelter type, early environmental enrichment and weather conditions on free-range behaviour of slow-growing broiler chickens. Animal, 11(6),1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116002172
40. Stewart, J.S. (1994). Ostrich behaviour and behavioural problems. Procedings of Annual Conference Avian Veterinarians, 28–30 September, Reno, Denver, USA, pp. 104–109.
41. Şahan, Ü., İpek, A. & Yılmaz, B. (2000). Devekuşlarında genel, sosyal ve cinsel davranışlar ve davranış problemleri. (General, social and reproductive behaviours and behavioural problems in ostriches). Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi, 2(2),48-54.
42. Van de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116,1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001.