Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 25 - 31, 23.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1314476

Öz

The aim of study was to determine the relationships between morphological characteristics of
roosters and fertility in broiler breeders at different age periods. A total of 48 roosters and 480
hens Ross 308 broiler breeder were used. The body weight, comb width and length, wattle
width and length, and tarsus length of roosters were measured for morphological
characteristics at 42, and 53 weeks of age. A total of 1500 eggs were incubated at 37.7 °C and
50-55% relative humidity for 18 d, then eggs were incubated at 36.6 °C and 60% relative
humidity for 3 d. The effect of age on comb length, comb index (P=0.002), wattle width
(P=0.008), wattle area (P=0.015) and tarsus length were found significant (P=0.000). There
were correlations between body weight and fertility at 53 weeks of age (r = 0.663; P<0.05).
There was no correlation between fertility and comb length, comb width, comb area, comb
index, wattle width, wattle area, wattle index, and tarsus length at 42 and 53 weeks of age
(P>0.05). In conclusion; some characteristics based on external appearance are used for male
selection in broiler breeders, but no relationship was found between investigated
morphological characteristics and fertility, except for body weight.

Teşekkür

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the directors of the commercial breeder farm Hastavuk (Bursa, Türkiye), who provided the facilities for this study.

Kaynakça

  • Abad, J.C. (2020). Management of males in broiler breeder operations. AviNews.com https://avinews.com/en/management-of-males-in-broiler-breeder-operations/
  • Abdel-Latiff, F.H. (2019). The linear association between live body weight and some body measurements in some chicken strains. Plant Archives, 19(1), 595-599.
  • Abudabos, A. (2010). The effect of broiler strain and parent flock age on hatchability and fertile Hatchability. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(3), 231-235. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.231.235
  • Adeogun, I.O. & Adeoye, A.A. (2004). Heritabilities and phenotypic correlations of growth performance traits in Japanese quails. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16(12), 103.
  • Anonymous (2018). Ross Parent stock management handbook. Aviagen, 0619-AVNR-087. https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_PS/RossPSHandBook2018.pdf
  • Bansal, A.K. & Cheema, R.A. (2014). Analysis of sperm and relationship between conventional sperm parameters and hypo-osmotic swelling test/acrylamide penetration assay-crossbred cattle bulls. Advance in Applied Research, 6(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2349-2104.6.1.007
  • Bilcik, B. & Estevez, I. (2004). Impact of male-male competition and morphological traits on mating strategies and reproductive success in broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 92(4), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.007
  • Bilcik, B., Estevez, I. & Russek-Cohen, E. (2005). Reproductive success of broiler breeders in natural mating systems: The effect of male-male competition, sperm quality, and morphological characteristics. Poultry Science, 84(9), 1453-1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.9.1453
  • Brillard, J.P. (2003). Practical aspects of fertility in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 59(4), 441-446. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030027
  • Chung, K.M. (2010). Effect of double interspiking on Fertility, Behavior, and Blood, and Blood Parameters in Broiler Breeder Males Reared under Heat Stress Conditions [Unpublished MSc dissertation]. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. 98 pp.
  • Dahloum, L., Moula, N., Halbouche, M. & Mignon-Grasteau, S. (2016). Phenotypic characterization of the indigenous chickens (Gallus gallus) in the northwest of Algeria. Archives Animal Breeding, 59(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-59-79-2016
  • Francesch, A., Villalba, I. & Cartañà, M. (2011). Methodology for morphological characterization of chicken and its application to compare penedesenca and empordanesa breeds. Animal Genetic Resource, 48(48), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633610000950 Groeneveld, L.F., Lenstra, J.A., Eding, H., Toro, M.A., Scherf, B., Pilling, D., Negrini, R., Finlay, E.K., Jianlin, H., Groeneveld E. & Weigend, S. (2010). Genetic diversity in farm animals-a review. Animal Genetics, 41(1), 6-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x
  • Gumułka, M. & Kapkowska, E. (2005). Age effect of broiler breeders on fertility and sperm penetration of the perivitelline layer of the ovum. Animal Reproduction Science, 90(1-2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.018
  • Hamilton, W.D. & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218(4570), 384-387. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123238
  • Hocking, P.M. & Bernard, R. (1997). Effects of dietary crude protein content and food intake on the production of semen in 2 lines of broiler breeder males. British Poultry Science, 38(2), 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669708417969
  • Joseph, N.S., Robinson, F.E., Renema, R.A. & Thorsteinson, K.A. (2003). Comb growth during sexual maturation in female broiler breeders. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12(1), 7-13. https: //doi.org/10.1093/japr/12.1.7
  • Kumar, M., Dahiya, S., Ratwan, P & Sheoran, N. (2022). Evaluation of morphological traits in Aseel and Kadaknath breeds under backyard poultry farming using principal component analysis. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 46(2), 356-365. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4183
  • Leão, R.A.C., Castro, F.L.S., Xavier, P.R., Vaz, D.P., Grázia, J.G.V., Baião, N.C., Avelar, G.F. & Marques Júnior, A.P. (2017). Comb, cloaca and feet scores and testis morphometry in male broiler breeders at two different ages. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 69(6), 1529-1538. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-9233
  • Lei, L., Zhang, Z., Groenewoud, F., Kingma, S.A., Li, J., Velde, M.V.V. & Komdeur, J. (2019). Extra-pair mating opportunities mediate parenting and mating effort trade - offs in a songbird. Behavioural Ecology, 31(2), 421-431.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz204
  • Mahammad, A.M., Murali, L., Naga Raja Kumari, K., Narendra Nath, D. & Saichaitanya, V. (2018). Effect of age on fertility and hatchability of RAJASRI birds. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 7(6), 1970-1975.
  • McGary, S., Estevez, I. & Bakst, M.R. (2003). Potential relationships between physical traits and male broiler breeder fertility. Poultry Science, 82(2), 328-37.https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.2.328.
  • McGary, S., Estevez, I., Bakst, M.R. & Pollock, D.L. (2002). Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility in male broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 81(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.1.102
  • Minitab (2013). MINITAB release 17.1.0, Minitab Inc, USA.
  • Møller, A.P. (1994). Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Mukhtar, N. & Khan, S.H. (2012). Comb: An important reliable visual ornamental trait for selection in chickens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 68(3), 425-434.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933912000542
  • Nääs, I.A., Sonoda, L.T., Romanini, C.E.B., Morello, G.M., Neves, H.A.F., Baracho, M.S., Souza, S.R.L.S., Menezes, A.G., Mollo Neto, M., Moura, D.J. & Almeida Paz, I.C.L. (2008). Morphological asymmetry and broiler welfare. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 10(4), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000400003
  • Nesheim, M.C, Austic, R.E. & Card, L.E. (1979). Poultry production (12th ed.). Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.
  • Özdemir, D. (2019). Some morphological characteristics of İspenç roosters and chickens. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 23(Special Issue), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.449617
  • Pizzari, T., Jensen, P. & Cornwallis, C.K. (2004). A novel test of the phenotype linked fertility hypothesis reveals independent components of fertility. Proceedings of the Royal Society: B Biological Sciences, 271(1534), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2577
  • Rizzi, C. & Verdiglione, R. (2015). Testicular growth and comb and wattles development in three Italian chicken genotypes reared under free-range conditions. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 14(2), 3653. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3653
  • Souza, C., Jaimes, J.J.B. & Gewehr, C.E. (2017). Equations of prediction for abdominal fat in brown egg-laying hens fed different diets. Poultry Science, 96(6), 1688-1695. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew421
  • Tabbaa, M.J. & Hassanin, H.H. (2018). Factors influencing the morphological characteristics of village chickens’ genetic resources in the Abu Dhabi Emirate, UAE. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.81007
  • Verhulst, S., Dieleman, S.J. & Parmentier, H.K. (1999). A trade-off between immune competence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl. Proceeding of National Academy of Science USA, 96(8), 4478-4481. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.8.4478
  • Wilson, H.R., Piesco, N.P., Miller, E.R. & Nesbeth, W.G. (1979). Prediction of the fertility potential of broiler breeder males. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 35(2), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19790008
  • Wolanski, N., Renema, R., Robinson, F. & Wilson, J. (2004). End-of-season carcass and reproductive traits in original and replacement male broiler breeders. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 13(3), 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.3.451
  • Yahaya, H.K., Ibrahim, H. & Abdulsalam, S. (2012). Correlation between body weight and body conformation of two broiler strains under the same dietary treatment. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4(3), 181-183.
  • Yılmaz Dikmen, B. & İpek, A. (2006, September 10-14). The Effects of shank length on incubation results of Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs and hatched chick shank length [Poster presentation]. XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62(supplement), 448 pp.
  • Yılmaz Dikmen, B. & Şahan, Ü. (2009). The relationship among age, yolk fatty acids content, and incubation results of broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 88(1), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00068
  • Zuk, M., Pompa, S.L. & Johnsen, T.S. (1995). Courtship displays, ornaments, and female mate choice in captive red jungle fowl. Behavior, 132(11-12), 821-836. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853995X00027
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 25 - 31, 23.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1314476

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abad, J.C. (2020). Management of males in broiler breeder operations. AviNews.com https://avinews.com/en/management-of-males-in-broiler-breeder-operations/
  • Abdel-Latiff, F.H. (2019). The linear association between live body weight and some body measurements in some chicken strains. Plant Archives, 19(1), 595-599.
  • Abudabos, A. (2010). The effect of broiler strain and parent flock age on hatchability and fertile Hatchability. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(3), 231-235. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.231.235
  • Adeogun, I.O. & Adeoye, A.A. (2004). Heritabilities and phenotypic correlations of growth performance traits in Japanese quails. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16(12), 103.
  • Anonymous (2018). Ross Parent stock management handbook. Aviagen, 0619-AVNR-087. https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_PS/RossPSHandBook2018.pdf
  • Bansal, A.K. & Cheema, R.A. (2014). Analysis of sperm and relationship between conventional sperm parameters and hypo-osmotic swelling test/acrylamide penetration assay-crossbred cattle bulls. Advance in Applied Research, 6(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2349-2104.6.1.007
  • Bilcik, B. & Estevez, I. (2004). Impact of male-male competition and morphological traits on mating strategies and reproductive success in broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 92(4), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.007
  • Bilcik, B., Estevez, I. & Russek-Cohen, E. (2005). Reproductive success of broiler breeders in natural mating systems: The effect of male-male competition, sperm quality, and morphological characteristics. Poultry Science, 84(9), 1453-1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.9.1453
  • Brillard, J.P. (2003). Practical aspects of fertility in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 59(4), 441-446. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030027
  • Chung, K.M. (2010). Effect of double interspiking on Fertility, Behavior, and Blood, and Blood Parameters in Broiler Breeder Males Reared under Heat Stress Conditions [Unpublished MSc dissertation]. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. 98 pp.
  • Dahloum, L., Moula, N., Halbouche, M. & Mignon-Grasteau, S. (2016). Phenotypic characterization of the indigenous chickens (Gallus gallus) in the northwest of Algeria. Archives Animal Breeding, 59(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-59-79-2016
  • Francesch, A., Villalba, I. & Cartañà, M. (2011). Methodology for morphological characterization of chicken and its application to compare penedesenca and empordanesa breeds. Animal Genetic Resource, 48(48), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633610000950 Groeneveld, L.F., Lenstra, J.A., Eding, H., Toro, M.A., Scherf, B., Pilling, D., Negrini, R., Finlay, E.K., Jianlin, H., Groeneveld E. & Weigend, S. (2010). Genetic diversity in farm animals-a review. Animal Genetics, 41(1), 6-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02038.x
  • Gumułka, M. & Kapkowska, E. (2005). Age effect of broiler breeders on fertility and sperm penetration of the perivitelline layer of the ovum. Animal Reproduction Science, 90(1-2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.018
  • Hamilton, W.D. & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218(4570), 384-387. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123238
  • Hocking, P.M. & Bernard, R. (1997). Effects of dietary crude protein content and food intake on the production of semen in 2 lines of broiler breeder males. British Poultry Science, 38(2), 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669708417969
  • Joseph, N.S., Robinson, F.E., Renema, R.A. & Thorsteinson, K.A. (2003). Comb growth during sexual maturation in female broiler breeders. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12(1), 7-13. https: //doi.org/10.1093/japr/12.1.7
  • Kumar, M., Dahiya, S., Ratwan, P & Sheoran, N. (2022). Evaluation of morphological traits in Aseel and Kadaknath breeds under backyard poultry farming using principal component analysis. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 46(2), 356-365. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4183
  • Leão, R.A.C., Castro, F.L.S., Xavier, P.R., Vaz, D.P., Grázia, J.G.V., Baião, N.C., Avelar, G.F. & Marques Júnior, A.P. (2017). Comb, cloaca and feet scores and testis morphometry in male broiler breeders at two different ages. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 69(6), 1529-1538. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-9233
  • Lei, L., Zhang, Z., Groenewoud, F., Kingma, S.A., Li, J., Velde, M.V.V. & Komdeur, J. (2019). Extra-pair mating opportunities mediate parenting and mating effort trade - offs in a songbird. Behavioural Ecology, 31(2), 421-431.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz204
  • Mahammad, A.M., Murali, L., Naga Raja Kumari, K., Narendra Nath, D. & Saichaitanya, V. (2018). Effect of age on fertility and hatchability of RAJASRI birds. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 7(6), 1970-1975.
  • McGary, S., Estevez, I. & Bakst, M.R. (2003). Potential relationships between physical traits and male broiler breeder fertility. Poultry Science, 82(2), 328-37.https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.2.328.
  • McGary, S., Estevez, I., Bakst, M.R. & Pollock, D.L. (2002). Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility in male broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 81(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.1.102
  • Minitab (2013). MINITAB release 17.1.0, Minitab Inc, USA.
  • Møller, A.P. (1994). Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Mukhtar, N. & Khan, S.H. (2012). Comb: An important reliable visual ornamental trait for selection in chickens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 68(3), 425-434.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933912000542
  • Nääs, I.A., Sonoda, L.T., Romanini, C.E.B., Morello, G.M., Neves, H.A.F., Baracho, M.S., Souza, S.R.L.S., Menezes, A.G., Mollo Neto, M., Moura, D.J. & Almeida Paz, I.C.L. (2008). Morphological asymmetry and broiler welfare. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 10(4), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2008000400003
  • Nesheim, M.C, Austic, R.E. & Card, L.E. (1979). Poultry production (12th ed.). Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.
  • Özdemir, D. (2019). Some morphological characteristics of İspenç roosters and chickens. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 23(Special Issue), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.449617
  • Pizzari, T., Jensen, P. & Cornwallis, C.K. (2004). A novel test of the phenotype linked fertility hypothesis reveals independent components of fertility. Proceedings of the Royal Society: B Biological Sciences, 271(1534), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2577
  • Rizzi, C. & Verdiglione, R. (2015). Testicular growth and comb and wattles development in three Italian chicken genotypes reared under free-range conditions. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 14(2), 3653. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3653
  • Souza, C., Jaimes, J.J.B. & Gewehr, C.E. (2017). Equations of prediction for abdominal fat in brown egg-laying hens fed different diets. Poultry Science, 96(6), 1688-1695. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew421
  • Tabbaa, M.J. & Hassanin, H.H. (2018). Factors influencing the morphological characteristics of village chickens’ genetic resources in the Abu Dhabi Emirate, UAE. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.81007
  • Verhulst, S., Dieleman, S.J. & Parmentier, H.K. (1999). A trade-off between immune competence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl. Proceeding of National Academy of Science USA, 96(8), 4478-4481. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.8.4478
  • Wilson, H.R., Piesco, N.P., Miller, E.R. & Nesbeth, W.G. (1979). Prediction of the fertility potential of broiler breeder males. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 35(2), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19790008
  • Wolanski, N., Renema, R., Robinson, F. & Wilson, J. (2004). End-of-season carcass and reproductive traits in original and replacement male broiler breeders. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 13(3), 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.3.451
  • Yahaya, H.K., Ibrahim, H. & Abdulsalam, S. (2012). Correlation between body weight and body conformation of two broiler strains under the same dietary treatment. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4(3), 181-183.
  • Yılmaz Dikmen, B. & İpek, A. (2006, September 10-14). The Effects of shank length on incubation results of Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs and hatched chick shank length [Poster presentation]. XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62(supplement), 448 pp.
  • Yılmaz Dikmen, B. & Şahan, Ü. (2009). The relationship among age, yolk fatty acids content, and incubation results of broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 88(1), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00068
  • Zuk, M., Pompa, S.L. & Johnsen, T.S. (1995). Courtship displays, ornaments, and female mate choice in captive red jungle fowl. Behavior, 132(11-12), 821-836. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853995X00027
Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Kanatlı Hayvan Yetiştirme ve Islahı
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Saliha Sabah Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-4577-8054

Bilgehan Yılmaz Dikmen Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4397-5428

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Sabah, S., & Yılmaz Dikmen, B. (2023). Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods. Journal of Poultry Research, 20(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1314476
AMA Sabah S, Yılmaz Dikmen B. Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods. JPR. Haziran 2023;20(1):25-31. doi:10.34233/jpr.1314476
Chicago Sabah, Saliha, ve Bilgehan Yılmaz Dikmen. “Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods”. Journal of Poultry Research 20, sy. 1 (Haziran 2023): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1314476.
EndNote Sabah S, Yılmaz Dikmen B (01 Haziran 2023) Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods. Journal of Poultry Research 20 1 25–31.
IEEE S. Sabah ve B. Yılmaz Dikmen, “Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods”, JPR, c. 20, sy. 1, ss. 25–31, 2023, doi: 10.34233/jpr.1314476.
ISNAD Sabah, Saliha - Yılmaz Dikmen, Bilgehan. “Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods”. Journal of Poultry Research 20/1 (Haziran 2023), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1314476.
JAMA Sabah S, Yılmaz Dikmen B. Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods. JPR. 2023;20:25–31.
MLA Sabah, Saliha ve Bilgehan Yılmaz Dikmen. “Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods”. Journal of Poultry Research, c. 20, sy. 1, 2023, ss. 25-31, doi:10.34233/jpr.1314476.
Vancouver Sabah S, Yılmaz Dikmen B. Relationships Between Morphological Characteristics of Roosters in Broiler Breeders at Different Age Periods. JPR. 2023;20(1):25-31.

204x63 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 
Print ISSN:1302-3209 - Online ISSN:2147-9003

Journal of Poultry Research is indexed by the following national and international scientific indexing services

14964166171665216684166851668616687


166881668916692


1669016691