Determination of general structure of enterprises producing eggs in free range system in ordu province

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 1 - 13, 30.06.2024

Kardelen Güçcük Sezai Alkan

https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1507508

Öz

In this research, the general structure of the enterprises that produce eggs in the free range system in Ordu province was determined from face-to-face surveys with 54 producers.
It has been determined that 68.5% of the enterprises producing eggs in the free range system are located in the field under hazelnut, and 42.6% prefer to use concrete materials in the construction of the poultry house. It has been stated that 50% of the enterprises provide ventilation in the hen house with fans, 44.4% use nipple type drinkers and 42.6% prefer thick sawdust as litter material. In addition, 61.1% of enterprises do not use workers. The egg yield was more than 81% in 26.9% of the enterprises. Moreover, the average feed consumption per chicken in 42.5% of the enterprises was between 100-120g. According to the statements, 72.2% of the producers were not members of the "Egg Producers Association" and 81.5% of the producers pointed out that they did not meet the expectations of the “Egg Producers
Association”. At the same time, 70.4% of the producers told that the Covid-19 epidemic affected the egg sales prices, and 50% of the producers affected by the epidemic stated that they were negatively affected.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ordu province, Hen, Egg, Free Range System, Survey

Kaynakça

• Akkaya, C.A., İşgüzar, E. (2006). Isparta ili merkez ilçesindeki tavukçuluk işletmelerinin yapısal ve donanımsal yönden incelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 188-192.
• Anderson, K. E. (2009). Overview of natural and organic production: Looking back to the future. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 18, 348-354.
• Anonim, (2014). Ordu İli tarım master planı. Ordu İl Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğü, Ordu.
• Aydın, F., Çelen, M.F. (2017). GAP bölgesi yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmelerinin demografik ve sosyo-ekonomik yapısı. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (2), 107-117.
• Benli, N., Durmuş, İ. (2015). Değişik markalarda Ordu ilinde satışa sunulan yumurtaların kalite özeliklerinin belirlenmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 4(1), 27-36.
• Brambell, F. W. R. (1965). Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Command Paper No. 2836 HMSO, London.
• Bogdanov, I. A. (1997). Seasonal effects on free-range egg production. World Poultry-Misset 13, 47-49.
• Cönk, E. (2006). Afyonkarahisar ili merkez ilçe yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmelerinin yapısal özellikleri ve işletmelerde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hayvan Sağlığı Ekonomisi ve İşletmeciliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Afyon.
• Çimrin, T., Parlakay, O., Akpınar, G. Ç., Tapkı, N., Yıldırım, H. (2019). Yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmeleri: Hatay ili örneği. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22(5), 787-793.
• Demircan V, Yılmaz H, Dernek Z, Bal T, Gül M, Köknaroğlu, H. (2010). Economic analysis of different laying hen farm capacities in Turkey. Agricultural Economics, 56(10), 489-497.
• Derebaşı, S., Alkan, S. (2018). Ordu ilinde yumurta tüketim bilincinin belirlenmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 7(2), 237-244.
• Durmuş, İ., Alkan, S. (2015). Serbest ffset yumurta tavukçuluğu el kitabı. Olay ffset. Karapınar Mahallesi, Altınordu/ Ordu.
• FREPA, (1998). Free-Range Egg Production Standards, 1998. Free Range Egg and Poultry Association of Victoria.
• Glatz, P. C., Y. J., Ru. (2002). Free-range poultry in a pasture/crop rotation system. Proceedings 2002 poultry information exchange 14-16 April 2002. Poultry information exchange association Inc. Caboolture Queensland, Australia. pp. 7-10.
• Huque, Q. M. E. (1999). Free communication No. 12 (Coordinator: E. F. Gueye). First INFPD/FAO Electronic conference on family poultry, December 7, 1998-March 5, 1999.
• İpek, A., Sözcü, A. (2015). Alternatif kanatlı yetiştirme sistemlerinde yetiştirme pratikleri ve refah standartları. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 133-146.
• Köse, B., Durmuş, İ. (2014). Ordu ilindeki tavukçuluk işletmelerinin genel yapısı, Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 3(2):, 89-94.
• Miao, Z.H., Glatz, P.C., Ru, R.J. (2005). Free-range Poultry Production- A Review. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Science, 18 (1), 113-132.
• Sarıca, M., Akkalkan, N., Erensoy, K. (2020). Traditional poultry production and commercial production opportunities in Kastamonu province. Journal of Poultry Research, 17(1), 35-40.
• SCARM, (1995). Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals. Domestic Poultry. Standing Committee of Agriculture and Resource Management. CSIRO Publications. Vic. Australia.
• SPSS, (2008). SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
• Sorensen, M. A. (1994). Egg production in Sweden: The market conditions-economically and politically. Proceedings of Seminar “Future Egg Production in Sweden”. Kronagg and Jordbruksverket, Stockholm.
• Sözcü, A., Yılmaz, E. (2014). Yumurta tavuğu yetiştirme sistemlerinde refah problemleri. Hayvansal Üretim, 55(2), 38-42.
• Şekeroğlu A, Sarıca M, Demir E, Ulutaş Z, Tilki̇ M, Saatçi̇ M., Omed, H. (2010). Effects of different housing systems on some performance traits and egg qualities of laying hens. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Advances, 9 (12), 1739-1744.
• Thear, K. (1997). Free-range Poultry. 2nd ed. Ipswich: Farming Press.
• Tuğluk, E., Yalçın, C. (2004). Nevşehir ili Kozaklı ilçesinde yumurta tavukçuluğu işletmelerinin genel yapısal özellikleri ve karşılaşılan sorunlar. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5, 41-46.
• Türker, İ., Alkan, S. (2018). Comparison of hens reared in free-range and deep-litter systems in terms of certain production characteristics. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 24, 179-184.
• Yenilmez, F., Uruk, E. (2016). Free-range sistemi, avantaj ve dezavantajları. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5, 315-324.