A Comparative Study on Immunoglobulin G Levels and Microbial Quality of Fresh and Freeze-Dried Bovine Colostrum

Year 2025, Volume: 44 Issue: 2, 75 - 80, 31.12.2025

Yiğit Kaçar , Mehmet Emin Akkaş , Onur Topal , Kadir Semih Gümüşsoy

https://doi.org/10.30782/jrvm.1822300

Abstract

Ensuring adequate passive transfer of immunity in neonatal calves primarily depends on the immunoglobulin G (IgG) content and hygienic quality of colostrum. Various preservation methods have been used to maintain IgG concentration and control bacterial growth, and among these, freeze-drying has emerged as a promising and innovative approach. This study aimed to compare IgG concentrations and microbiological quality of fresh colostrum and freeze-dried colostrum powder.
Colostrum samples (n = 28) with Brix values ≥27% were collected from tuberculosis- and brucellosis-free dairy herds. Each sample was divided into fresh and freeze-dried aliquots. IgG concentrations were measured using a bovine-specific quantitative ELISA kit, and total bacterial counts were determined by standard culture methods.
IgG concentrations were 84.45 ± 2.35 mg/mL in fresh colostrum and 72.62 ± 1.59 mg/mL in freeze-dried samples, representing approximately a 14% reduction (p < 0.001). Despite this decrease, IgG levels remained above the minimum threshold required for successful passive transfer. Total bacterial counts decreased significantly from 1.78 × 10⁵ ± 1.70 × 10⁴ to 1.63 × 10⁴ ± 6.54 × 10³ cfu/mL, corresponding to a 90.9% reduction (p < 0.001). Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus spp., and Candida spp. were isolated in both forms, while Staphylococcus aureus was detected only in fresh colostrum and not after freeze-drying.
These results demonstrate that freeze-drying markedly enhances microbiological safety while preserving IgG concentrations at functionally adequate levels, supporting its use when fresh high-quality colostrum is unavailable or where pathogen transmission risk is a concern. Future studies should evaluate long-term storage conditions to better define the stability of IgG and microbial dynamics over time.

Keywords

Immunglobulin G , Colostrum , Freeze-drying

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted with the approval of the Bursa Uludağ University Local Animal Ethics Committee (2023–09/04).

Thanks

The authors would like to thank the Uşak Governorship; the Uşak Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry (İl Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğü); the Uşak Cattle Breeders’ Association (Uşak İli Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Birliği); the Republic of Türkiye Zafer Development Agency (T.C. Zafer Kalkınma Ajansı); and the Revolving Capital Enterprise for supplying the colostrum powders used in this study, for their valuable support and contributions.

References

• Sotudeh S, Rabbani Khorasgani M, Etemadifar Z, Zarkesh-Esfahani SH. Effects of spray-drying, freeze-drying and pasteurization on microbiological quality and IgG level of bovine colostrum. J Food Qual Hazards Control. 2018;5(2):54–60.
• Weaver DM, Tyler JW, VanMetre DC, Hostetler DE, Barrington GM. Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. J Vet Intern Med. 2000;14(6):569–577.
• Quigley JD III, Kost CJ, Wolfe TM. Absorption of protein and IgG in calves fed a colostrum supplement or replacer. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85(5):1243–1248.
• Godden SM, Lombard JE, Woolums AR. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2019;35(3):535–556.
• de Souza RS, Dos Santos LBC, Melo IO, Cerqueira DM, Dumas JV, Leme FDOP, et al. Current diagnostic methods for assessing transfer of passive immunity in calves and possible improvements: A literature review. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(10):2963.
• Lora I, Barberio A, Contiero B, Paparella P, Bonfanti L, Brscic M, et al. Factors associated with passive immunity transfer in dairy calves: combined effect of delivery time, amount and quality of the first colostrum meal. Animal. 2018;12(5):1041–1049.
• Batmaz H. Perinatal Dönem Sağlığı. In: Batmaz H, editor. Sığırlarda Sürü Sağlığı ve Yönetimi. 2nd ed. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2021. p.82–85.
• Stewart S, Godden S, Bey R, Rapnicki P, Fetrow J, Farnsworth R, et al. Preventing bacterial contamination and proliferation during the harvest, storage, and feeding of fresh bovine colostrum. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(7):2571–2578.
• Denholm K. A review of bovine colostrum preservation techniques. J Dairy Res. 2022;89(4):345–354.
• Chelack BJ, Morley PS, Haines DM. Evaluation of methods for dehydration of bovine colostrum for total replacement of normal colostrum in calves. Can Vet J. 1993;34(7):407–412.
• Abd El-Fattah AM, Abd Rabo FHR, El-Dieb SM, El-Kashef HAS. Preservation methods of buffalo and bovine colostrum as a source of bioactive components. Int Dairy J. 2014;39(1):24–27.
• Shukla S. Freeze drying process: A review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011;2(12):3061–3070.
• Bhatta S, Stevanovic Janezic T, Ratti C. Freeze-drying of plant-based foods. Foods. 2020;9(1):87.
• Salar S, Jafarian S, Mortazavi A, Nasiraie LR. Effect of hurdle technology of gentle pasteurisation and drying process on bioactive proteins, antioxidant activity and microbial quality of cow and buffalo colostrum. Int Dairy J. 2021;121:105138.
• Kaçar Y, Mecitoğlu Z, Topal O, Batmaz H. Comparison of four semi-quantitative tests for evaluation of colostrum quality in Saanen goats. S Afr J Anim Sci. 2021;51(5):657–663.
• Kaçar Y, Batmaz H. Evaluation of the differences in proteomics of high-quality bovine colostrum and low-quality bovine colostrum. Vet Med Sci. 2023;9(6):2852–2861.
• Fecteau G, Baillargeon P, Higgins R, Paré J, Fortin M. Bacterial contamination of colostrum fed to newborn calves in Québec dairy herds. Can Vet J. 2002;43(7):523–526.
• Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey BK, Carter GR. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. 5th ed. London: Mosby International Ltd; 2002. p.118–345.
• Martysiak-Żurowska D, Rożek P, Puta M. The effect of freeze-drying and storage on lysozyme activity, lactoferrin content, superoxide dismutase activity, total antioxidant capacity and fatty acid profile of freeze-dried human milk. Dry Technol. 2022;40(3):615–625.
• McGuirk SM, Collins M. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2004;20(3):593–603.
• Godden S, McMartin S, Feirtag J, Stabel J, Bey R, Goyal S, et al. Heat-treatment of bovine colostrum. II: Effects of heating duration on pathogen viability and immunoglobulin G. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89(9):3476–3483.
• Zouari A, Briard-Bion V, Gaucheron F, Schuck P, Gaiani C, Triki M, et al. Effect of pH on the physicochemical characteristics and the surface chemical composition of camel and bovine whey protein powders. Food Chem. 2020;333:127514.
• Fatima M, Sajid M, Saima H, Nadeem MT, Ahmad RS, Mehmood S, et al. In vitro evaluation of spray and freeze-dried bovine colostrum powder and their effects on the nutritional and functional properties. Int J Food Prop. 2024;27(1):985–1002.
• Borad SG, Singh AK. Colostrum immunoglobulins: Processing, preservation and application aspects. Int Dairy J. 2018;85:201–210.
• Elfstrand L, Lindmark-Månsson H, Paulsson M, Nyberg L, Åkesson B. Immunoglobulins, growth factors and growth hormone in bovine colostrum and the effects of processing. Int Dairy J. 2002;12(11):879–887.
• Huaning Y, Benheng G. Storage stability of freeze-dried colostral whey powders with different additives. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2013;6(2):95–106.