Pattern and filament optimization for 3D-printed reinforcements to enhance the flexural behavior of cement-based composites

Abstract

Cement-based materials are the world's most widely utilized construction materials due to their high compressive strength. However, they need reinforcement to withstand direct or indirect tensile forces. This study evaluated the potential use of 3D-printed polymers as an alternative reinforcement in cement-based composites. Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), Polyamide (PA), and Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) based triangular and honeycomb-patterned 3D-printed reinforcements were incorporated into cement-based composites, and their mechanical performances were compared under three-point flexural tests by considering both polymer and pattern type. Both triangular and honeycomb patterns enhanced flexural behavior. Considering all filaments, the honeycomb pattern was found more effective than the triangular one for increasing flexural strength, deflection capacity, and toughness up to 46.80%, 251.85%, and 77.66%, respectively. In the case of filament type, 3D-printed PA-type filament in a honeycomb pattern preserved flexural strength, enhanced deflection capacity, and increased flexural toughness with pseudo-deflection hardening behavior. 3D-printed honeycomb patterned reinforcements produced by PA have the opportunity to be used in the manufacture of cement-based composites.

Keywords

• 3D-printing
• Polyamide
• Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene
• Polyethylene terephthalate glycol
• cement
• flexural

References

1. [1] American Society for Testing and Materials. (2012). Standard terminology for additive manufactur ing technologies (ASTM Standard No. F2792-12). https://www.astm.org/f2792-12.html
2. [2] Hull, C. W. (1984). Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. U.S. Patent No. 4,575,330. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
3. [3] Crump, S. S. (1989). Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. U.S. Patent No. CA2027731C. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
4. [4] Mo, K. H., Alengaram, U. J., & Jumaat, M. Z. (2016). Structural performance of reinforced geopolymer concrete members: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 120, 251–264. [CrossRef]
5. [5] Bassurucu, M., Fenerli, C., Kına C., & Akbas, S. D. (2022). Effect of fiber type, shape, and volume frac tion on mechanical and flexural properties of con crete. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 7(3), 158–171. [CrossRef]
6. [6] Farina, I., Fabbrocino, F., Carpentieri, G., Modano, M., Amendola, A., Goodall, R., Feo L., & Fraternali, F. (2016). On the reinforcement of cement mortars through 3D printed polymeric and metallic fibers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 90, 76–85. [CrossRef]
7. [7] Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., & Deng, M. (2022). Four-point bending tests of ECC: Mechanical response and toughness evaluation. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, Article e01573. [CrossRef]
8. [8] Dogan, F., Dehghanpour, H., Subaşı, S., & Maraslı, M. (2022). Characterization of carbon fiber rein forced conductive mortars filled with recycled ferro chrome slag aggregates. Journal of Sustainable Con struction Materials and Technologies, 7(3), 145–157. [CrossRef]

9. [9] Rosewitz, J. A., Choshali, H. A., & Rahbar, N. (2019). Bioinspired design of architected cement-polymer composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 96, 252–265. [CrossRef]
10. [10] Hamidi, F., & Aslani, F. (2019). Additive manufac turing of cementitious composites: Materials, meth ods, potentials, and challenges. Construction and Building Materials, 218, 582–609. [CrossRef]
11. [11] Xu, Y., & Šavija, B. (2019). Development of strain hardening cementitious composite (SHCC) rein forced with 3D printed polymeric reinforcement: Mechanical properties. Composites Part B: Engineer ing, 174, Article 107011. [CrossRef]
12. [12] Shweiki, A., Junaid, MT., & Barakat, S. (2019). Flex ural characteristics of mortar cement reinforced with 3D-printed polymer. In Proceeding 4th World Con gress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engi neering (CSEE’19), Rome, Italy, Paper No. ICSECT 154. [CrossRef]
13. [13] Katzer, J., & Szatkiewicz, T. (2019). Properties of concrete elements with 3-D printed formworks which substitute steel reinforcement. Construction and Building Materials, 210, 157–161. [CrossRef]
14. [14] Katzer, J., & Szatkiewicz, T. (2020). Effect of 3D printed spatial reinforcement on flexural character istics of conventional mortar. Materials, 13(14), Ar ticle 3133. [CrossRef]
15. [15] Salazar, B., Aghdasi, P., Williams, I. D., Ostertag, C. P., & Taylor, H. K. (2020). Polymer lattice-reinforce ment for enhancing ductility of concrete. Materials and Design, 196, Article 109184. [CrossRef]
16. [16] Xu, Y., Zhang, H., Gan, Y., & Šavija, B. (2021). Ce mentitious composites reinforced with 3D printed functionally graded polymeric lattice structures: Ex periments and modelling. Additive Manufacturing, 39, Article 101887. [CrossRef]
17. [17] Gödek, E., Şevik, S., & Özdilli, Ö. (2020). A study on flexural behavior of cement paste reinforced by using 3D-printed polylactic acid-based reinforcement. In Proceeding 2nd International Icontech Symposium on Innovative Surveys in Positive Sciences, pp. 270– 277, Budapest, Hungary.
18. [18] Santana, H. A., Amorim Júnior, N. S., Ribeiro, D. V., Cilla, M. S., & Dias, C. M. R. (2021). 3D printed mesh reinforced geopolymer: Notched prism bend ing. Cement and Concrete Composites, 116, Article 103892. [CrossRef]
19. [19] Hofler, R., & Renyi, S. (1914). GB157429A. https:// patents.google.com/patent/GB157429A/en?oq=G B157429A.
20. [20] Abuşka, M., Şevik, S., & Kayapunar, A. (2019). Experimental analysis of solar air collector with PCM-honeycomb combination under the natural convection. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 195, 299–308. [CrossRef]
21. [21] Habib, F. N., Iovenitti, P., Masood, S. H., & Nikzad, M. (2018). Cell geometry effect on in-plane energy absorption of periodic honeycomb structures. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94, 2369–2380. [CrossRef]
22. [22] Turkish Standardization Institute. (2016). Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength (TS EN Standard No. 196-1). https://intweb.tse.org. tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?0811180511151080511041191101040550471051021200881110431 13104073088066113082087078107067083069056.
23. [23] Blok, L. G., Longana, M. L., Woods, B. K. S. (2020). Fabrication and characterisation of aligned discon tinuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastics as feedstock material for fused filament fabrication. Materials, 13(20), Article 4671. [CrossRef]
24. [24] Foti, D. (2011). Preliminary analysis of concrete re inforced with waste bottles PET fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1906–1915. [CrossRef]
25. [25] Shahzad, Q., Umair, M., Waqar, S. (2022). Bib liographic analysis on 3D printing in the building and construction industry: Printing systems, mate rial properties, challenges, and future trends. Jour nal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Tech nologies, 7(3), 198–220. [CrossRef]