Research Article

Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking

Number: 055 December 31, 2023
EN

Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking

Abstract

Order picking is one of the most repetitive, labor-intensive, and physically demanding operations in warehouses. Picking hundreds of orders daily requires high metabolic energy expenditure and is characterized by poor ergonomics posing high risks for musculoskeletal disorders. In traditional order picking, the order picker walks around racks in a warehouse throughout the day. Alternatively, it is aimed at minimizing inefficient time and musculoskeletal strains with ride-on order picking by allowing the order picker to stand on an operator’s platform of an order-picking truck and ride the truck between stop locations. However, the order picker has to step down from the platform at each stop location and step up onto the platform before riding the truck to the next stop location. Therefore, riding the truck with frequent stops leads to more metabolic energy expenditure and musculoskeletal disorders than walking, although it is faster. Benefiting advantages of both traditional and ride-on order picking, a relatively new order picking truck (collaborative order picking truck) is deployed in warehouses to reduce inefficient walking time and ergonomic riding disorders. In collaborative order picking, the order picker can walk from a stop location directly to the next pick location while the truck moves to the next stop location autonomously or ride the truck to the next stop location in case of having a large distance between stop locations. This paper develops an optimization model to minimize total metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking by finding the shortest route and the best collaboration decision (walk or ride). Based on the Monte Carlo simulation, the metabolic energy expenditure with collaborative order picking is analyzed. Our results indicate metabolic energy savings with collaborative order picking up to 200% and 83% compared to traditional and ride-on order picking, respectively.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye

Project Number

1059B191900637

References

  1. E. H. Grosse, C. H. Glock, M. Y. Jaber, and W. P. Neumann, “Incorporating human factors in order picking planning models: framework and research opportunities,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 695–717, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.919424.
  2. J. A. Tompkins, J. A. White, Y. A. Bozer, and J. M. A. Tanchoco, Facilities planning, 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  3. K. Azadeh, R. De Koster, and D. Roy, “Robotized and Automated Warehouse Systems: Review and Recent Developments,” Transp. Sci., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 917–945, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1287/trsc.2018.0873.
  4. Y. Jaghbeer, R. Hanson, and M. I. Johansson, “Automated order picking systems and the links between design and performance: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 58, no. 15, pp. 4489–4505, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1788734.
  5. R. De Koster, T. Le-Duc, and K. J. Roodbergen, “Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 481–501, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.009.
  6. M. Masae, C. H. Glock, and E. H. Grosse, “Order picker routing in warehouses: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 224, p. 107564, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107564.
  7. B. Gajšek, G. Đukić, T. Opetuk, and H. Cajner, “Human in Manual Order Picking Systems,” in Ćosić P. (ed.) Management of Technology – Step to Sustainable Production (MOTSP) conference proceedings, 2017, pp. 5–17.
  8. A. Otto, N. Boysen, A. Scholl, and R. Walter, “Ergonomic workplace design in the fast pick area,” OR Spectr., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 945–975, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00291-017-0479-x.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Industrial Engineering, Ergonomi and Human Factors Management, Packaging, Storage and Transportation (Excl. Food and Agricultural Products)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2023

Submission Date

September 2, 2023

Acceptance Date

December 18, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Number: 055

APA
Tutam, M. (2023). Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, 055, 132-145. https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1354278
AMA
1.Tutam M. Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking. JSR-A. 2023;(055):132-145. doi:10.59313/jsr-a.1354278
Chicago
Tutam, Mahmut. 2023. “Minimization of Metabolic Energy Expenditure in Collaborative Order Picking”. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, nos. 055: 132-45. https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1354278.
EndNote
Tutam M (December 1, 2023) Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking. Journal of Scientific Reports-A 055 132–145.
IEEE
[1]M. Tutam, “Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking”, JSR-A, no. 055, pp. 132–145, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.59313/jsr-a.1354278.
ISNAD
Tutam, Mahmut. “Minimization of Metabolic Energy Expenditure in Collaborative Order Picking”. Journal of Scientific Reports-A. 055 (December 1, 2023): 132-145. https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1354278.
JAMA
1.Tutam M. Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking. JSR-A. 2023;:132–145.
MLA
Tutam, Mahmut. “Minimization of Metabolic Energy Expenditure in Collaborative Order Picking”. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, no. 055, Dec. 2023, pp. 132-45, doi:10.59313/jsr-a.1354278.
Vancouver
1.Mahmut Tutam. Minimization of metabolic energy expenditure in collaborative order picking. JSR-A. 2023 Dec. 1;(055):132-45. doi:10.59313/jsr-a.1354278

Cited By