An experimental investigation of reducing the wake length at a low speed by passive flow control and biomimetic application

Abstract

This study explores the use of biomimetic designs in passive flow control to reduce wake length at low speed, aiming to enhance aerodynamic efficiency. Inspired by nature's optimization of fluid dynamics in birds and marine life, this research investigates the applicability of these biological principles to improve aerospace engineering designs, particularly for low Reynolds number flows relevant to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The experimental setup involved a smoke visualization wind tunnel to examine flow patterns around several wing models. These models incorporated bio-inspired elements, mimicking shark skin riblets and humpback whale tubercles, strategically positioned to delay flow separation and minimize wake length. The wing models, designed using 3D modeling software and printed via a 3D printer, were tested at various angles of attack in a smoke visualization wind tunnel by measuring their wake length via image processing. Experiments were carried out in two stages; types of protrusion were investigated on the first stage and the position of a selected protrusions examined in the second stage. The findings indicate significant differences in wake length reduction across the models, with certain biomimetic adaptations, especially optimized triangular protrusions inspired by shark skin, showing notable improvements in aerodynamic performance at higher angles of attack. Among different models in the first stage, Model B was the most effective model in aerodynamic performance with a drag reduction effect of 18% compared to the reference model NACA 0018. In the second stage experiments, Model B-15 showed the most effective aerodynamic result by reducing the wake length by 30% in the range of α=0˚-20˚, while the reduction for Model B-20 was 26%. The results offer valuable insights into the design of efficient, low-speed flight vehicles, suggesting that biomimetics could lead to innovative designs with higher performance and energy efficiency. This research emphasizes the potential of integrating biomimetic principles into passive flow control strategies.

Keywords

• biomimetics
• experimental aerodynamics
• passive flow control
• smoke visualization
• riblet
• drag reduction

References

1. [1] J. F. V Vincent et al., “Biomimetics : its practice and theory Biomimetics : its practice and theory,” pp. 471–482, 2009, doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0127.
2. [2] J. B. Anders, “Biomimetic flow control,” Fluids 2000 Conf. Exhib., no. June, 2000, doi: 10.2514/6.2000-2543.
3. [3] J. B. R. Rose, S. G. Natarajan, and V. T. Gopinathan, Biomimetic flow control techniques for aerospace applications: a comprehensive review, Springer, vol. 20, no. 3. Netherlands, 2021 doi: 10.1007/s11157-021-09583-z.
4. [4] V. T. Gopinathan, J. Bruce Ralphin Rose, and M. Surya, “Investigation on the effect of leading edge tubercles of sweptback wing at low reynolds number,” Mech. Ind., vol. 21, no. 6, 2020, doi: 10.1051/meca/2020095.
5. [5] D. W. Bechert, G. Hoppe, and W. E. Reif, “On the drag reduction of the shark skin,” AlAA 23rd Aerosp. Sci. Meet. 1985, 1985, doi: 10.2514/6.1985-546.
6. [6] W. A. Akpan, C. M. Orazulume, E. J. Oduobuk, E. Engineering, I. State, and A. I. State, “Aerodynamics of Birds’ Flight: Analysis and Applications,” International Journal of Applied Science and Research, pp. 156–177, 2023.
7. [7] D. T. H. New and B. F. Ng, Flow Control Through Bio-inspired Leading-Edge Tubercles: Morphology, Aerodynamics, Hydrodynamics and Applications. 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23792-9.
8. [8] F. E. Fish, P. W. Weber, M. M. Murray, and L. E. Howle, “Marine applications of the biomimetic humpback whale flipper,” Mar. Technol. Soc. J., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 198–207, 2011, doi: 10.4031/MTSJ.45.4.1.

9. [9] Z. Han et al., “Biomimetic multifunctional surfaces inspired from animals,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 234, pp. 27–50, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2016.03.004.
10. [10] C. Stark and W. Shi, “The influence of leading-edge tubercles on the hydrodynamic performance and propeller wake flow development of a ducted propeller,” Proc. Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf., pp. 2837–2844, 2021.
11. [11] M. M. Zhang, G. F. Wang, and J. Z. Xu, “Experimental study of flow separation control on a low-Re airfoil using leading-edge protuberance method,” Exp. Fluids, vol. 55, no. 4, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00348-014-1710-z.
12. [12] A. Asghar, R. E. Perez, P. W. Jansen, and W. D. E. Allan, “Application of leading-edge tubercles to enhance propeller performance,” AIAA J., vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 4659–4671, 2020, doi: 10.2514/1.J058740.
13. [13] A. G. Domel, M. Saadat, J. C. Weaver, H. Haj-Hariri, K. Bertoldi, and G. V. Lauder, “Shark skin-inspired designs that improve aerodynamic performance,” J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 15, no. 139, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0828.
14. [14] J. G. Leishman, Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2022.
15. [15] E. Güler, T. Durhasan, İ. Karasu, and H. Akbıyık, “Passive Flow Control around NACA 0018 Airfoil Using Riblet at Low Reynolds Number,” Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2208–2217, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.21597/jist.897982.
16. [16] X. Han, D. Y. Zhang, X. Li, and Y. Y. Li, “Bio-replicated forming of the biomimetic drag-reducing surfaces in large area based on shark skin,” Chinese Sci. Bull., vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1587–1592, May 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11434-008-0219-3.
17. [17] P. R. Viswanath, “Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets,” 2002.
18. [18] M. Seyhan, M. Sarioglu and Y. E. Akansu, "Influence of Leading-Edge Tubercle with Amplitude Modulation on NACA 0015 Airfoil," AIAA JOURNAL, vol.59, no.10, pp.3965-3978, 2021 [19] G. Jurnal, C. Kose, C. Kolbakir, A. S. Durna, and B. Karadag, “Improvement of smoke rakes and the image processing for the flow visualization experiments,” in 11th Ankara International Aerospace Conference, September 2021, 2021, pp. 1–7.
19. [20] G. Jurnal, T. Çobanoğlu, C. Kolbakir, and A. S. Durna, “Flow Control Using Plasma Actuator On The Airfoils With Various Camber And Thickness Dimensions,” in ULIBTK’24 Uluslararası Katılımlı 23. Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Kongresi, 2023, pp. 1–10.
20. [21] M. S. Genç, I. Karasu, and H. Hakan Açikel, “An experimental study on aerodynamics of NACA2415 aerofoil at low Re numbers,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 39, pp. 252–264, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.01.029.
21. [22] E. N. Jacobs and A. Sherman, “Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number,” Tech. rep., Washington. D.C Natl. Advis. Comm. Aeronaut., no. 586, pp. 227–259, 1939.