Tuning the magnetization by preserving half-metallicity of FeCl2 via embedding transition metal atoms: a DFT study

Year 2025, Issue: 062 , 29 - 39 , 30.09.2025

Ali Emre Genç

https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1598269

https://izlik.org/JA69NY68NP

Abstract

In this article, the varying magnetization of the modified FeCl2 two-dimensional (2D) layers have been investigated through Density Functional Theory calculations with and without DFT+U method.. Following the optimizations and post-processing electronic analyses regarding the FeCl2 bulk, the two-dimensional layer was created, and the 3d group of transition metal (TM) atoms (from Sc to Ni) were embedded into the defective Cl position in line with the experimental works. The calculations show that while each Fe atom in FeCl2 has 4.00 μ_B magnetization in the pure layer, after embedding transition metal atoms, this value varies in a broad range between 8 to 19 μ_B in completely FM (ferromagnetic) ground state based on only DFT calculations. Between these TM-embedded layers, Ti embedded FeCl2 layer showed half-metallicity in one of two spin channels with and without DFT+U calculations, a prerequisite for spintronic applications. The Projected Density of States (PDOS) of Ti embedded layer, t2g orbitals (dxy, dxz, and dyz) of the neighboring Fe atoms are responsible for the conductivity in the spin-down channel based on DFT calculations. The hubbard parameters completely changes the picture where the non-neighboring atom contribution to the conductive electronic states are dominant. These findings are supported by band gap curves. The bond type identification has been elucidated by ICOHP (integrated crystal orbital Hamiltonian population) and ICOBI (integrated crystal orbital bond index) parameters. PDOS (partial density of states) and pCOHP (partial crystal orbital Hamiltonian) plots were used to identify which bonding-antibonding orbitals were populated. Finally, embedding Ti into Cl defect positions can induce different magnetization levels by preserving half metallicity while the other layers do not provide half-metallicity.

Keywords

Density functional theory , Spintronics , 2D materials , Transition Metal Embedding , FeCl2 , Transition metal dihalides

References

• [1] L. Shi and X. Luo, “A first-principles investigation of spintronics of nitrophosphorene doped with 3d transition metals,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 125, no. 23, 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5089903.
• [2] M. N. Baibich, et al., “Giant magnetoresistance of (001) Fe/(001) Cr magnetic superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 61, no. 21, p. 2472, 1988, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2472.
• [3] I. Khan Muhammad, K. Swera, and M. Abdul, “Computational study of 4d transition metals doped bismuthene for spintronics,” Physica E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct., vol. 126, p. 114464, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114464.
• [4] D. Gao, et al., “Defect-related ferromagnetism in ultrathin metal-free gC₃N₄ nanosheets,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 2577–2581, 2014, doi: 10.1039/c3nr04743a.
• [5] M. Luo, H. Yin, and Y. Shen, “Magnetic and electronic properties of BN nanosheets with different nonmagnetic metal dopants: A first-principles study,” J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., vol. 31, pp. 2211–2216, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10948-018-4589-8.
• [6] E.-J. Kan, et al., “Half-metallicity in hybrid BCN nanoribbons,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 129, no. 8, 2008, doi: 10.1063/1.2971187.
• [7] K. Li, et al., “First-principles study on ferromagnetism in C-doped AlN,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 374, no. 35, pp. 3671–3675, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.07.011.
• [8] A. S. Botana and M. R. Norman, “Electronic structure and magnetism of transition metal dihalides: bulk to monolayer,” Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 3, no. 4, p. 044001, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.044001.
• [9] M. Ashton, et al., “Two-dimensional intrinsic half-metals with large spin gaps,” Nano Lett., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 5251–5257, 2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01367.
• [10] M. A. McGuire, “Crystal and magnetic structures in layered, transition metal dihalides and trihalides,” Crystals, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 121, 2017, doi: 10.3390/cryst7050121.
• [11] X. Zhou, et al., “Atomically thin 1T-FeCl₂ grown by molecular-beam epitaxy,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 124, no. 17, pp. 9416–9423, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03050.
• [12] E. Torun, et al., “Stable half-metallic monolayers of FeCl₂,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 106, no. 19, 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4921096.
• [13] C. Sun and X. Luo, “Tuning the magnetic and electronic properties of monolayer VI₃ by 3d transition metal doping: A first-principles study,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 571, p. 151208, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151208.
• [14] P. Giannozzi, et al., “Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 29, no. 46, p. 465901, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79.
• [15] P. Giannozzi, et al., “QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 21, no. 39, p. 395502, 2009, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502.
• [16] X. Liao, et al., “Density functional theory for electrocatalysis,” Energy Environ. Mater., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 157–185, 2022, doi: 10.1002/eem2.12204.
• [17] P. E. Blöchl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 50, no. 24, p. 17953, 1994, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953.
• [18] G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 59, no. 3, p. 1758, 1999, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758.
• [19] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 77, no. 18, p. 3865, 1996, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865.
• [20] H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, “Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 5188, 1976, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188.
• [21] G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, and H. Jónsson, “A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 354–360, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010.
• [22] E. Sanville, et al., “Improved grid‐based algorithm for Bader charge allocation,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 899–908, 2007, doi: 10.1002/jcc.20575.
• [23] W. Tang, E. Sanville, and G. Henkelman, “A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 084204, 2009, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204.
• [24] V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougréeff, and R. Dronskowski, “Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets,” J. Phys. Chem. A, vol. 115, no. 21, pp. 5461–5466, 2011, doi: 10.1021/jp202489s.
• [25] R. Dronskowski and P. E. Bloechl, “Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations,” J. Phys. Chem., vol. 97, no. 33, pp. 8617–8624, 1993, doi: 10.1021/j100135a014.
• [26] R. Y. Rohling, et al., “Electronic structure analysis of the Diels-Alder cycloaddition catalyzed by alkali-exchanged faujasites,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 122, no. 26, pp. 14733–14743, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04409.
• [27] R. Y. Rohling, et al., “Correlations between density-based bond orders and orbital-based bond energies for chemical bonding analysis,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 2843–2854, 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08934.
• [28] R. Van Santen and I. Tranca, “How molecular is the chemisorptive bond?” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 18, no. 31, pp. 20868–20894, 2016, doi: 10.1039/C6CP01394E.
• [29] R. A. van Santen, I. Tranca, and E. J. Hensen, “Theory of surface chemistry and reactivity of reducible oxides,” Catal. Today, vol. 244, pp. 63–84, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.07.009.
• [30] P. C. Müller, et al., “Crystal orbital bond index: covalent bond orders in solids,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 125, no. 14, pp. 7959–7970, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00718.
• [31] K. B. Wiberg, “Application of the Pople-Santry-Segal CNDO method to the cyclopropylcarbinyl and cyclobutyl cation and to bicyclobutane,” Tetrahedron, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1083–1096, 1968, doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(68)88057-3.
• [32] I. Mayer, “Charge, bond order and valence in the AB initio SCF theory,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 270–274, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(83)80005-0.
• [33] S. Maintz, et al., “LOBSTER: A tool to extract chemical bonding from plane‐wave based DFT,” J. Comput. Chem., 2016, doi: 10.1002/jcc.24300.
• [34] S. J. Clark, et al., “First principles methods using CASTEP,” Z. Kristallogr., vol. 220, no. 5–6, pp. 567–570, 2005, doi: 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075.
• [35] R. K. Ghosh, A. Jose, and G. Kumari, “Intrinsic spin-dynamical properties of two-dimensional half-metallic FeX₂ (X = Cl, Br, I) ferromagnets: Insight from density functional theory calculations,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, no. 5, p. 054409, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.054409.
• [36] Yang, Y., et al., “An insulating and easy magnetization-plane magnet: The DFT+ U and constrained electron population study of 1 T-FeCl2,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 233, p. 112752, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112752
• [37] D. V. Yandulov and R. R. Schrock, “Catalytic reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia at a single molybdenum center,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5629, pp. 76–78, 2003, doi: 10.1126/science.1085326.
• [38] E. Dražević and E. Skúlason, “Are there any overlooked catalysts for electrochemical NH₃ synthesis—new insights from analysis of thermochemical data,” iScience, vol. 23, no. 12, p. 101803, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101803.
• [39] V. Orazi, et al., “DFT study of the hydrogen adsorption and storage on Ni₄ cluster embedded in multivacancy graphene,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 55, pp. 30805–30817, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.106.
• [40] L. Pauling, “The nature of the chemical bond. IV. The energy of single bonds and the relative electronegativity of atoms,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 3570–3582, 1932, doi: 10.1021/ja01348a011.
• [41] Wang, H., V. Eyert, and U. Schwingenschlögl, “Electronic structure and magnetic ordering of the semiconducting chromium trihalides CrCl3, CrBr3, andCrI3”. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 23, no. 11, p. 116003. 2011.doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/11/116003
• [42] Yekta, Y., et al., “Strength of effective Coulomb interaction in two-dimensional transition-metal halides MX 2 and MX 3 (M= Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni; X= Cl, Br, I)”. Physical Review Materials, Vol: 5, no: 3: p. 034001, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.034001
• [43] Y. Feng, et al., “Robust half-metallicities and perfect spin transport properties in 2D transition metal dichlorides,” J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 4087–4094, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C8TC00443A.