An Evaluation of the Instruction of Generalization in Elementary School Social Studies Program

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 60 - 95, 23.11.2011

Öz

Generalizations are important content materials that should be instructed in the Social Studies program. The instruction of generalizations and the causal relationships emphasized in generalizations are important for students to have meaningful learning experiences and to gain causal reasoning and critical thinking skills. Social Studies program emphasizes the acquisition of creating scientific generalization skill as a fundamental skill to be instructed directly, and the importance of generalization instruction is highlighted. Therefore, this study is important in that it draws attention to the importance of teaching generalization and creates basis for the future research in the field. In this regard, it aims at evaluating the instruction of the generalizations in the “Our Country and the World” unit in Social Studies program for 6th grades in Primary School. In line with this general purpose, the instruction of the generalizations in the unit was analyzed qualitatively.
The study was conducted with three social studies teachers working in three different schools located in Seyhan, Adana. The data were collected through the observation technique with a view to obtaining in depth data about the instruction of generalization in social studies lesson. Semi-structured observation form, prepared in the light of the generalization content elements, was used as the data collection tool. These content elements consisted of four aspects: generalization statement, concepts related to generalization, cause-effect relationships between concepts, and facts about generalization.In addition to observation, document analysis was conducted with a view to supporting results and strengthening the implications. The documentary analysis was performed based on the generalizations and previously identified elements about the generalizations in the scope of the six topics in the “Our Country and the World” unit. The data collected from the observations were analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. The content elements of generalization were used as themes creating conceptual framework. The data was analyzed taking into account these themes. The reliability was enhanced by the separate calculation of the coder reliability for the analysis of the generalizations in the units and the observation data.
According to the result of the study, it can be suggested that three teachers carried out the instruction of the generalizations in the unit by sticking to course book. Overall, the generalizations were expressed verbally in the form of suggestion by the teachers. Even though the generalizations were in the course book, three teachers were observed that they did not explain them in the classroom. For the sake of carrying out the instruction the generalizations, it can be said that the participants did not do any content analysis. Instead, they carried out their instructions considering the presentation order of the information and the subjects in the course book. Besides, it was occurred that the content arrangement of the course book was not in the appropriate for the teachers to carry out the instruction of the generalization. Participants stated the cause-effect relationship between the generalization concepts by using quoted speech or question-answer methods such as why? How come? What are the reasons according to you? Except this, on behalf of teaching or explaining the cause-effect relationships, no other activity was carried out. Additionally, with regard to some of the generalizations employed in the classroom, it was observed that cause-effect relationship was not explained or contrarily with regard to the generalizations which were not mentioned in the classroom, it was observed that the cause-effect relationship was explained. In the conclusion of the study, it was realized that there were generalization statements in the relevant parts of the unit in the course book but there were not any information which explain the cause-effect relationship between the concepts in the generalizations. In the result part of the research, it was found that the participants did not show exactly the relationship of the generalizations and the factual information in the same subject.
In conclusion, according to the findings gathered from the study it can be asserted that even though there were a lot of generalization statements in the unit, three teachers did not do any content arrangements concerning to generalization instruction and they preferred quoting exactly the same information in the course book. In the same manner, it can be asserted that the information in the Social Studies course book was not arranged to carry out generalization instruction and although there were generalization statements, there was not any qualified information that can cause gaining those generalization information and the relationship of fact, concept and generalization was not set up in the proper way. In line with the results of the study, teachers can be trained on the generalization instruction models focusing on application. Besides, visual reminders such as schemes and diagrams aiming at creating generalizations and causal relationships can be included both in course books and in the teaching process. Lastly, teachers can make use of different techniques apart from question and answer so as to teach and create generalizations more effectively. In order to be able to generalize the results of the study, this issue can be examined on a larger group of participants. Alternatively, instruction of generalization can be analyzed in a detailed way through problem solving studies such as action research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anahtar Kelimeler: genelleme, genelleme ö?retimi, sosyal bilgiler dersi, ilkö?retim ö?rencileri

Kaynakça

• Akyürek, S. (2006). Din eğitiminde genellemelerin öğretimi. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(1), 123-141.
• Beck,I.L., McKeown, M.G. ve Gromoll, E.W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6 (2) 99-158.
• Benson, J. S. (1998). Using an inquiry approach with preservice teachers to explain the process of facts, concept, and generalization. Social Studies, 89(5), 227-233.
• Bogdan, R.C. ve Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
• Burlbaw, L.M. (1994). Applying generalizations in middle school geography classes. Social Studies, 85(3), 110-113.
• Cromley, J.G., Snyder-Hogan, L.E. ve Luciw-Dubas, U.A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 59-74.
• Ciardiello, A. V. (2002). Helping adolescents understand cause/effect text structure in social studies. Social Studies, 31-36.
• Coşkun, M. (1999). Ögeleri belirleme kuramına dayalı kavram öğretiminin akademik başarı ve kalıcılığa etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
• Coşkun, M. (2007). İçeriğin öğretim için düzenlenmesi (1.Baskı). A. Doğanay, (Ed.), Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri içinde (83-127). Ankara: Pegema Yayınları.
• Çakmak, F. (2006). İlköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler dersi nüfus ve yerleşme konusunda geçen kavramları anlama düzeyleri ve kavram yanılgıları. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyon.
• Deryakulu, D. (2006). Sözel bilgilerin öğretimi. A. Doğanay, (Ed.), İçerik türlerine dayalı öğretim içinde (1-27). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Doğanay, A. (2002). Öğretimde kavram ve genellemelerin geliştirilmesi (1.Baskı.). C. Öztürk ve D. Dilek, (Ed.), Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi içinde (227-255). Ankara: Pegema Yayınları.
• Doğan, O. (2007). İlköğretim 5. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersi “bir ülke bir bayrak” ünitesindeki kavramların öğrenilmesinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
• Ediger, M. (2010). Sequence in the social studies. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37 (3), 200-202.
• Eggen, P. D. ve Kauchak, D.P. (1996). Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Erickson, H.L. (1995). Stirring the head, heart and soul: Redefining curriculum and instruction. California: Corwin Press.
• Erişti, B. ve Küçük, M. (2006). Kuralların öğretimi. A. Şimşek, (Ed.), İçerik türlerine dayalı öğretim içinde (71-100). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Fidan, N. (2009). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler dersinde geçen “demokrasi” ve “cumhuriyet” kavramlarıyla ilgili bilgilerinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
• Gençmehmetoğlu, R. (2009). VIII. sınıf Türkiye Cumhuriyeti inkılap tarihi ve Atatürkçülük dersinde yer alan olgu, kavram ve genellemelerin öğretimi ve önemi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
• Jonassen, D.H. ve Ionas, I.G. (2008). Designing effective supports for causal reasoning. Education Tech Research Development. 56, 287-308.
• İlğan, A ve Kıranlı S. (2007). Öğretmenlerin sınıf içi etkinliklerinin denetlenmesinde klinik denetim modeli. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences. 2, 151-
• Kaya, B. (2005). İlköğretim okulu 6. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersi kavramlarının öğretimi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Keskin, K. (2003). İlköğretim 5. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde öğrencilere tarih kavramlarının kazandırılma düzeyinin araştırılması. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Kılıç, A. A. (2004). İlköğretim 5. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde öğretmenlerin kullandıkları içerik düzenleme stratejilerinin ögeleri belirleme kuramı temelinde değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
• Kuhn, D. (2009). Do students need to be taught how to reason. Educational Research Review, 4, 1-6.
• Martorella, P. H. (1998). Social studies for elementary school children developing young citizens (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Marzano, R.J., Brandt, R.S., Hughes, C.S:, Jones, B.F., Presseisen, B.Z., Rankin, S.C. vd. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction, Alexandria, VA: ASCD
• McCall, A.L. (2010). Teaching powerful social studies ideas through literature circles. Social Studies, 101, 152–159.
• McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., Lehman, S. ve Poiquin, .A. (2007). The effect of causal diagrams on text learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 367-388.
• Mckinney, C.W. ve Edgington, W.D. (1997). Issues related to teaching generalizations in elementary social studies. Social Studies, 88(2), 78–81.
• MEB, (2006). İlköğretim 6. sınıf sosyal bilgiler öğretmen kılavuz kitabı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, No: 4285.
• MEB, (2008). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler ders kitabı (4.Baskı). Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, No:4283.
• MEB, (2010). İlköğretim 6. sınıf sosyal bilgiler öğretmen kılavuz kitabı (5.Baskı). Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, No: 4286.
• Merrill, M.D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, (279-330). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assc.
• Michaelis, J.U. ve Garcia, S. (1996). Social studies for children: A guide to basic instruction (11th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Miles, M.B. ve Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Myers, M P. ve Savage, T. (2005). Enhancing student comprehension of social studies material. The Social Studies, 96(1), 18-23
• Ornstein, A.C. ve Hunkins, F.P. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Romiszowski, A.J. (1984). Designing instructional systems (1st ed.). London: Kogan Page.
• Shiveley, J. ve Misco, T. (2009). Reclaiming generalizations in social studies education. Social Studies Research and Practice, 4 (2), 73-78.
• Sunal, C.S. ve Haas, M.E. (2005). Social studies for the elementary and middle grades: A constructivist approach. Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
• Sunal, D.W. ve Sunal, C.S. (2003). Science in the elementary and middle school. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Şeker, M. (2003). İlköğretim okulu 6. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersi kavramlarının kazanılmışlık düzeyi (Üsküdar örneği). Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Taşlı, İ. (2000). Günümüz coğrafya öğretiminde öğrenci aktivitelerinin bilgi üretimine dönüştürülmesinde olgular, kavramlar ve genellemelerin sistematik kullanımının sağlanması. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, S. 145.
• Van Cleaf, D.W. (1991). Action in elementary social studies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.
• Vural, M. (2005). İlköğretim okulu ders programları ve öğretim kılavuzları (1-5 sınıflar). Erzurum: Yakutiye Yayıncılık.
• Yanpar, T. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı (7.Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayınları.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Genişletilmiş 5.Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Yükselir, A. (2006). İlköğretim altıncı sınıf sosyal bilgiler programında geçen kavramların kazanımı ve kalıcılığında kavram analizi yönteminin etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.