A Scoping Review of the Attributes Screened in the Selection Processes for Initial Teacher Education (ITE)

Aida Valero Moya; Ville Mankki; Pekka Räihä

A Scoping Review of the Attributes Screened in the Selection Processes for Initial Teacher Education (ITE)

Abstract

This scoping review maps the attributes assessed in the selection of candidates for Initial Teacher Education (ITE) programmes, aiming to identify key factors linked to effective teaching. A systematic search across five major academic databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science, Educational Resources Information Center, Academic Search Premier, and Teacher Reference Center) yielded 32 relevant studies published between 2013 and 2023 for analysis. The findings underscore the significance of both cognitive attributes (e.g., academic scores, cognitive skills) and non-cognitive attributes (e.g., personal traits, resilience, motivation) in predicting teacher effectiveness and programme success. While cognitive attributes provide a foundation for academic and pedagogical proficiency, non-cognitive factors are equally vital for sustaining teaching efficacy and long-term professional engagement. However, methods for assessing these attributes vary considerably, with evaluations of non-cognitive traits often facing challenges related to validity, reliability, and equity in high-stakes selection. By examining the complexities of defining and measuring teacher competencies and engaging with the debate on innate versus developed teaching qualities, this review advocates for a more integrated, rigorous, and context-sensitive approach to candidate assessment in teacher education.

Keywords

References

Al Hashmi, W., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). Developing a situational judgement test for admission into initial teacher education in Oman: An exploratory study. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 8(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1630042
Anane, E. (2018). Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ entry characteristics and their academic achievement. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 8(1), 56–67. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9352
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Atteberry, A., Loeb, S., y Wyckoff, J. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open, 1(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415607834
Bagdžiūnienė, D., Kazlauskienė, A., Liniauskaitė, A., Nasvytienė, D., Sakadolskienė, E., & Šečkuvienė, H. (2014). Evaluating the motivation of students to become teachers during admission into education-related study programs. Pedagogika, 113(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2014.1749
Bardach, L. & Klassen, R. M. (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30, 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312
Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., & Perry, N. E. (2020). Teachers’ Psychological Characteristics, Teacher Effectiveness, and Within-Teacher Outcomes: An Integrative Review. Teacher Selection Project Working Paper, 1–33. York University, United Kingdom.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project (pp. 25–48). Springer US.

Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Booth, A., Martyn-St James, M., Clowes, M., & Sutton, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
Borden-King, L., Gamas, W., Hintz, K., & Hultz, C. (2020). Should standardized testing define our profession? Phi Delta Kappan, 101(6), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720909586
Bowles, T., Hattie, J., Dinham, S., Scull, J., & Clinton, J. (2013). Proposing a comprehensive model for identifying teaching candidates. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0146-z
Camarero-Figuerola, M., Renta-Davids, A.-I., Tierno-García, J. M., & Gilabert-Medina, S. (2022). Teaching motivation, learning approaches, and academic success among prospective teachers in Catalonia (Spain). Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 29(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2159363
Castro, M. & Egido, I. (2024). What do we know about teachers?: policies, evidence, and future perspectives. Narcea Ediciones.
Chandía, E., Sanhueza, T., Mansilla, A., Morales, H., Huencho, A., & Cerda, G. (2023). Nonparametric cognitive diagnosis of profiles of mathematical knowledge of teacher education candidates. Current Psychology, 42, 32498–32511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04256-2
Childs, R., Broad, K., Gallagher-Mackay, K., Sher, K., Escayg, K.-A. y Mcgrath, C. (2011). Pursuing equity in and through teacher education program admissions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(24), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v19n24.2011
Casey, C. E. & Childs, R. A. (2007). Teacher education program admission criteria and what beginning teachers need to know to be successful teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 67, 1–24.
Dee, A. M., & Morton, B. M. (2016). Admissions metrics: A red herring in educator preparation? Issues in Teacher Education, 73(1), 73–89.
Dosio, G., Garro, M., & Romero, S. (2015). Meet the entrants: a tool for thinking about teaching practices. Cuadernos de educación, 13, 1–18.
Guerriero, S., & Révai, N. (2017). Knowledge-based teaching and the evolution of a profession. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. OECD Publishing.
Hanushek, E. A. & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-111001
Heinz, M. (2013). Tomorrow’s teachers—selecting the best: An exploration of the quality rationale behind academic and experiential selection criteria for initial teacher education programs. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9162-1
Hirschkorn, M., Sears, A., Sloat, E., Christou, T., Kristmanson, P., & Lemisko, L. (2017). The relevance of prior learning in teacher education admissions processes. Education, 23(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.37119/ojs2017.v23i1.256
Holden, M., & Kitchen, J. (2016). Evolving practices: Admissions policies in Ontario teacher education programs. Canadian Journal of Education, 39(4), 1–29. 10.13140/RG.2.1.4373.8480
Jamal, A. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in teacher education: Opportunities & challenges. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Kahramanoglu, R., & Bay, E. (2018). A study on possible assessment methods for admission standards for teacher education institutions. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5(10), 91–112.
Katz, S., & Frish, Y. (2016). A new admission system model for teacher colleges. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 463–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2014-0003
Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Al Hashmi, W., Kim, L. E., Longden, K., Metsäpelto, R.-L., & Györi, J. G. (2018). National context and teacher characteristics: Exploring the critical non-cognitive attributes of novice teachers in four countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.001
Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Patterson, F. & Rowett, E. (2017). Filtering functions of assessment for selection into initial teacher education programs. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 893–909). SAGE Publishers.
Klassen, R. M., & Kim, L. E. (2017). Assessing critical attributes of prospective teachers: Implications for selection into initial teacher education programs. BJEP, 5–22.
Klassen, R. M. & Kim, L. E. (2019). Selecting teachers and prospective teachers: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.12.003
Klassen, R. M. & Kim, L. E. (2021). Teacher Selection: Evidence-Based Practices. Springer.
Madni, A., Baker, E., Chow, K., Delacruz, G., & Griffin, N. (2015). Assessment of teachers from a social psychological perspective. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 54–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X14558203
Koschmieder, C., & Neubauer, A. C. (2021). Measuring emotion regulation for preservice teacher selection: A theory-driven development of a situational judgment test. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110363
Koschmieder, C., Weissenbachera, B., Pretscha, P., & Neubauera, A. C. (2018). The impact of personality in the selection of teacher students: Is there more to it than the Big Five? Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1536
Kunnari, J., Pursiainen, J., Lääräc, E., Rusanenc, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2023). Fit between applicants’ prior knowledge and university selection criteria: Study of Finnish teacher education student admission in 2013–2015. Journal of Education for Teaching, 49(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2072714
Kwaah, C. Y., & Palojoki, P. (2018). Entry characteristics, academic achievement and teaching practices: A comparative study of two categories of newly qualified teachers in basic schools in Ghana. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1561144
Lukaš, M., & Samardžić, D. (2015). Admission requirements for teacher education as a factor of achievement. Education & Educational Research, 2, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2015/b12/s3.003
MacMath, S., & Salingré, B. (2015). Evaluating intake variables for a teacher education program: Improving student success and process efficiency. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.09.002
Mankki, V. y Kyrö-Ämmälä, O. (2022). Arduous admissions and a precarious profession: student teachers’ pre-admission demotives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1978390
Mayer, D., Chiodo, J. J., & Diekman, J. E. (2015). Differential admission requirements and student achievement in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100209
McGraw, A., & Fish, T. (2018). Selection and rejection in teacher education: Qualities of character crucial in selecting and developing teacher education students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2017.1355048
Metsäpelto, R. L., Poikkeus, A. M., Heikkilä, M., Husu, J., Laine, A., Lappalainen, K., Lähteenmäki, M., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Warinowski, A., Iiskala, T., Hangelin, S., Harmoinen, S., Holmström, A., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., Lehesvuori, S., Mankki, V., & Suvilehto, P. (2022). A multidimensional adapted process model of teaching. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(2), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09373-9
Miller-Levy, R., Taylor, D., & Hawke, L. (2014). Maintaining the boundaries: Teacher preparation program admission criteria for screening quality candidates. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.1.8
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
OECD (2023). Teaching for the Future: Global Engagement, Sustainability and Digital Skills, International Summit on the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d6b3d234-en
Peček, M., & Macura-Milovanović, S. (2015). Do admission criteria for teacher education institutions matter? A comparative study on beliefs of student teachers from Serbia and Slovenia about inclusive practices. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.953824
Pérez, L. (2014). The candidate selection process for teacher education in Finland. The relevance of personal abilities towards teaching. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia (REID), 8, 109–132.
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., Khalil, H., & Parker, D. (2015). The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Pit-ten Cate, I. M., Rivas, S., & Busana, G. (2021). Increasing the diversity of the teacher workforce: Socio-political challenges to reducing inequalities in access to teacher education programs. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.685113
Sarwar, M., Alam, M., Hussain, S., Shah, A., & Jabeen, M. (2014). Assessing English speaking skills of prospective teachers at entry and graduation level in teacher education program. Language Testing in Asia, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-4-5
Sautelle, E., Bowles, T., Hattie, J., & Arifin, D. N. (2015). Personality, resilience, self-regulation, and cognitive ability relevant to teacher selection. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.4
Sheridan, L., Coleman, B., & Durksen, T. (2022). Important non-academic attributes in Australian initial teacher education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00443-x
Smith, K. F., Goldberg, M., Rosenthal, S., Carlson, L., Chen, J., Chen, C., & Ramachandran, S. (2014). Global rise in human infectious disease outbreaks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(101), Article 20140950. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0950
Stenlund, T. (2013). Validity of admission decisions based on assessment of prior learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.596924
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., (…) (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. 10.7326/M18-0850
United Nations. (2020, October 12). ‘Staggering’ rise in climate emergencies in last 20 years, new disaster research shows. United Nations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/10/1075142
UNESCO. (2024). Global report on teachers: addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/FIGU8035
Wyatt, J. E., & O'Neill, M. (2022). Investigation of non-academic characteristics used for selection entry of pre-service teachers into higher education courses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(12), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517X.5939

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Aida Valero Moya ^*
0000-0002-2551-2841
Spain

Ville Mankki This is me
0000-0001-7064-3472
Spain

Pekka Räihä This is me
0000-0002-6224-6319
Finland

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

April 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 12, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 14 Number: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89CG59ZZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Valero Moya, A., Mankki, V., & Räihä, P. (2025). A Scoping Review of the Attributes Screened in the Selection Processes for Initial Teacher Education (ITE). Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 14(3), 283-300. https://izlik.org/JA89CG59ZZ