EN
Student Teachers' Competence in Lesson Planning During Microteaching
Abstract
Learning how to plan a lesson is central to teacher education, yet there is only little research so far that has investigated how well student teachers write lesson plans. The aim of this paper, therefore, was to explore the competence of student teachers in lesson planning, with a special focus on the Cameroonian context. More specifically, the study sought to find out which stages and aspects of lesson planning caused more difficulty to trainee teachers, and whether collaboration led to better lesson plans. Data consisted of 101 lesson plans, among which 74 were planned by single trainee teachers and 27 planned by groups of two or three teacher candidates. These lessons were collected across two years through a graduate-level English language teaching methodology course. The findings reveal that trainee teachers had more difficulty writing lesson outcomes, aligning lesson outcomes with assessment, providing variety in assessment and quality take-home assignment as well, and asking relevant questions to guide student work. Also, it was found that joint lesson plans contained fewer errors and were better in terms of instructional quality than lessons planned by single teachers. Teacher education programs, therefore, should adopt microteaching and joint lesson planning activities for their potential to improve student teachers’ competence in lesson design.
Keywords
References
- Alanazi, M. H. (2019). A study of the pre-service trainee teachers’ problems in designing lesson plans. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 166-182. DOI: 10.24093/awej/vol10no1.15
- Allen, D. W. & Ryan, K. A. (1969). Microteaching. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.
- Al Darwish, S. & Sadeqi, A. A. (2016). Microteaching impact on student teacher’s performance: A case study from Kuwait. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(8), 126-134. DOI: 10.11114/jets.v4i8.1677
- Amobi, F. A. & Irwin, L. (2009). Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers’ reflection on teaching actions: Fresh perspective on an established practice. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 27-34.
- Belibi, E. P. R. (2018). Competency-based English language teaching in Cameroon francophone schools: Peculiarities, challenges and solutions. In L. N. Afutendem, C. M. Nkwetisama & G. T. Fai (Eds), Language and literature sciences in contemporary Cameroon and the Commonwealth (pp. 99-126).
- Benton-Kupper, J. (2011). The microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121, 830-835.
- Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessment to course objectives. Paper presented at the Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations Conference (13-17 April 2003), University of Aveiro.
- Carreño, L. & Ortiz, L. S. H. (2017). Lesson co-planning: Joint efforts, shared success. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 15, 173-198. Caven, M., Checkoway, A. & Gamse, B. (2012). Issue brief: Collaborative planning in Massachusetts Expanded Learning Time (ELT) schools. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=best
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Studies on Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
December 31, 2021
Submission Date
August 10, 2021
Acceptance Date
December 22, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 10 Number: 3