<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article         dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">2146-7277</issn>
                                                                                                        <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id/>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>Deprem Etkileşimlerinde Coulomb Gerilme Kriteri Değerlendirmesi;  Doğu Anadolu Fay Hattı</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>Evaluation of Coulomb Stress Criteria in Earthquake Interactions; East Anatolian Fault Line</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Sunbul</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ayse Bengu</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, İzmir, Türkiye</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Sunbul</surname>
                                    <given-names>Fatih</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Zonguldak, Türkiye</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20180601">
                    <day>06</day>
                    <month>01</month>
                    <year>2018</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>8</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>523</fpage>
                                        <lpage>535</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2011, Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Türkiye’nin önemli fay zonlarından biri olan Doğu Anadolu Fay Zonu  DAFZ , içinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılda çok aktif görünmemesine rağmen, tarihsel dönemlerde büyük depremler üretmiş bir fay zonudur. DAFZ’in yakın çevresinde büyük yerleşim birimlerinin bulunması, dolayısıyla gelecekte meydana gelebilecek muhtemel bir depremin yerinin belirlenmesi önem arz etmektedir. Fayların içinde bulundukları gerilme durumları ve komşu faylara olan etkisi Coulomb gerilme kriteri ile modellenebilmekte, gerilmenin arttığı bölgeler tespit edilerek, gelecekte oluşabilecek bir deprem lokasyon olarak değerlendirilebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada DAFZ uzerinde 1822 yılından günümüze kadar meydana gelmiş orta ve büyük ölçekli depremler Coulomb kriteri kullanılarak modellenmiş ve incelenen depremlerin birbirleri ile olan ilişkileri araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca, lehva hareketlerine bağlı meydana gelen tektonik gerilme değişimleri analiz edilerek, bölgede deprem riski oluşturabilecek gerilmenin yüksek olduğu alanlar incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre; modellenen 18 depremden 12 tanesi oluşumları itibariyle gerilme ilişkileri tespit edilmiş ve bir anlamda birbirlerini tetiklemişlerdir. Geçmiş yıllarda araştırmacılar tarafından gerilme artışı saptanan Elazığ-Bingöl arasındaki segmentin 2003 Bingöl ve 2010 Elazığ depremlerinden sonra kısmen deprem riski taşımadıgı da tespit edilmiştir. Inceleme alanında yer alan Kahramanmaraş-Malatya illeri arasında yer alan segmentte hem deprem tetiklemelerinden, hem de tektonik hareketlerden kaynaklı bir gerilme artışı tespit edilerek, deprem riskinin yüksek olduğu alan olarak çalışmada belirlenmiştir</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>East Anatolian Fault Zone  EAFZ , one of Turkey’s major fault zones, is quiescent in this century, was very active and produced major  earthquakes in historical periods. In terms of large cities existence along the EAFZ, It is important to identify a possible location  of the earthquake that may occur in the future. The stress state in the faults and their possible triggering effect to neighboring faults  can be modelled by the Coulomb stress criterion. Hence, the future earthquake location can be determined by detecting the stress  increased areas. In this study, moderate and large earthquakes that have been occurred since 1822 were modelled using the Coulomb  criterion and their stress interactions were investigated. In addition, by analyzing the tectonic stress changes due to plate motions, the  areas where the positive stress change is high, which may create earthquake risk in the region, were also investigated. According to the  study findings; 12 of the 18 modelled earthquakes have a causal link between their occurence; it can be concluded that the earthquakes  were triggered by their subsequent ones. Furthermore, the segment between Elazığ and Bingöl cities, where the stress increased area  examined by the researchers in the previous years, was currently determined to be partially relaxed following the 2003 Bingöl ve 2010  Elazığ earthquakes. In conclusion, the segment between Kahramanmaraş and Malatya cities was determined to be a seismic hazard  which poses a high earthquake risk due to both earthquake interactions and tectonic movements modelling.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Coulomb gerilme analizi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Doğu Anadolu Fay Zonu  DAFZ</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Gölbaşı-Türkoğlu segmenti</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sismik tehlike</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Coulomb stress analysis</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   East Anatolian Fault Zone  EAFZ </kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   Gölbaşı-Türkoğlu segment</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   Seismic hazard</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ambraseys, NN. 1989. Temporary seismic quiescence: SE Turkey. Geophys. J. Int., 96: 311- 331.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ambraseys, NN., Melville, CP. 1995. Historical evidence of faulting in Eastern Anatolia and Northern Syria. Ann. Geofis., 38: 337-344.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ambraseys, NN., Jackson, JA. 1998. Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys. J. Int., 133: 390-406.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arpat, E., Saroglu, F. 1972. The East Anatolian Fault System: thoughts on its development. Bull. Miner. Res. Explor. Ins. Turk., 78: 33-39.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Barka, AA., Kadinsky-Cade, K. 1988. Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonophysics, 7: 663 – 684</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Barka, A. 1996. Slip distribution along the North Anatolian Fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86: 1238- 1254.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cocco, M., Rice, J. 2002. Pore pressure and poroelasticity effects in Coulomb stress analysis of earthquake interactions. J. Geoph., Res., 107:1-17.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dogan, BA., Karakas, 2013. Geometry of co-seismic surface ruptures and tectonic meaning of the 23 October 2011 M w 7.1 Van earthquake (East Anatolian Region, Turkey). J. Struct. Geol., 46: 99-114.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Eyidoğan, H., Akinci, A. 1999. Site Attenuation and source parameters on the North Anatolian Fault zone, eastern Turkey estimated from the aftershocks of 13 March 1992 Erzincan earthquake. J. Seismol., 3: 363-373.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Freed, A., Syed, T., Burgmann, R. 2007. Evolution of stress southern California for the past 200 years from coseismic, postseismic and interseismic processes. Geop. Jour. Int., 169: 1164-1179.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gomberg, J., Ellis, MA. 1994. Topography and tectonics of the New Madrid seismic zone: Results of numerical experiments using a three-dimensional boundary element program. J. Geophys. Res., 99: 20299-20310.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Grosser, H., Baumbach, M., Berckhemer, H., Baier, B., Karahan, A., Schelle, H., Kruger, F., Paulat, A., Michel, G., Demirtas, R., Gencoglu, S., Yılmaz, R. 1998. The Erzincan (Turkey) earthquake (Ms=6.8) of March 13, 1992, and its aftershock sequence. Pure Appl. Geophys., 152: 465–505.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hubert-Ferrari, A., Armijo, R., King, GCP., Meyer, B., Barka, A. 2002. Morphology, displacement and slip rates along the North Anatolian Fault, Turkey.  J. Geophys. Res., 107: 2156- 2202.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kanamori, H., Anderson, DL. 1975. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65: 1073-1095.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">King, GCP., Stein, R., Lin, J. 1994. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84: 935–953.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">King, GCP. 2007. Fault interaction, earthquake stress changes, and the evolution of seismicity. Treatis. Geophys., 4: 225-255.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lorenzo Martin, R. 2006. Time dependent crustal deformation after strong earthquakes-rheological model calculations, PhD thesis, Ruhr University.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">McCloskey, J., Nalbant, SS., Steacy, S. 2005. Indonesian earthquake: Earthquake risk from co-seismic stress. Nature, 434: 291.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">McKenzie, DP. 1976. The East Anatolian fault: a major structure in eastern Turkey. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 29: 189–193.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Milkereit, C. 2004. Implications of the 2003 Bingol earthquake for the interaction between the North and East Anatolian faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94: 2400– 2406.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nalbant, SS., Hubert, A., King, GCP. 1998. Stress coupling between earthquakes in northwest Turkey and the north Aegean Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 103: 24469-24486.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nalbant, SS., McCloskey, J., Steacy, S., Barka, A. 2002. Stress accumulation and increased seismic risk in Eastern Turkey. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 195: 291–298.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nostro, C., Cocco, M., Belardinelli, M. 1997. Static stress changes in extensional regimes: An application to southern Apennines (Italy). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87: 234-248.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Okada, Y. 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82: 1018–1040.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Parsons, T., Toda, S., Stein, RS., Barka, A., Dieterich, JH. 2000. Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: an interaction-based probability calculation. Science, 288: 661– 66.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pollitz, FF., Sacks, IS. 2002. Stress triggering of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake by transient deformation following the 1992 Landers earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92: 1487– 1496.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Reasenberg, PA., Simpson, RW. 1992. Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the Loma Prieta earthquake. Science, 255: 1687–1690.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Reilinger, R., McClusky S., Vernant, P. 2006. GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J. Geophys. Res., 111: B05411, doi: 10.1029/ 2005JB004051.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Steacy, S., Gomberg, J., Cocco, M. 2005. Introduction to special section: Stress transfer, earthquake triggering and timedependant seismic hazard. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110: doi: 10.1029/ 2005JB003692.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stein, R., King, GC., Lin, J. 1992. Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas Fault system caused by the 1992 M: 7.4 Landers earthquake. Science, 258: 1328-1332.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stein, RS., Barka A., Dieterich, JH. 1997. Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int., 128: 594-604.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şaroglu, F., Emre, Ö., Kuşcu, İ. 1992. The East Anatolian fault zone of Turkey. Annal. Tecton., 6: 99-125.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şengör, AMC., Yılmaz, Y. 1981. Tethyan evolution of Turkey, a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics, 75: 181-241.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tan, O., Pabuccu Z., Tapirdamaz C., Inan, S., Ergintav, S., Eyidogan, H., Aksoy, E., Kuluozturk, F. 2011. Aftershock study and seismotectonic implications of the 8 March 2010 Kovancılar (Elazığ, Turkey) earthquake (MW = 6.1). Geoph. Res. Let., 38: L11304, doi:10.1029/2011GL047702.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Utkucu, M. 2013. 23 October 2011 Van, Eastern Anatolia, earthquake (Mw=7.1) and seismotectonics of Lake Van area. J. Seismol., 17: 783-805.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vergnolle, M., Pollitz, F., Calais, E. 2003. Constraints on the viscosity of the continental crust and mantle from GPS measurements and postseismic deformation models in western Mongolia, J. Geophys. Res., 108, doi:10.1029/2002JB002374.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
