kaüi̇i̇bfd Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1309-4289 2149-9136 Kafkas Üniversitesi 10.36543/kauiibfd.2019.046 ASEAN VE GÜNEYDOĞU ASYA BÖLGESELCİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-4035 Temiz Süleyman IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, SİYASET BİLİMİ VE ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER BÖLÜMÜ 12 31 2019 10 20 1086 1116 01 30 2019 10 17 2019 Copyright © 2010, Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2010 Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

ASEAN, güneydoğu Asya’da, öncüllerine nispetendevamlılık sağlayabilmiş ve gün geçtikçe daha da ciddi adımlar atarak,bölgesel, aynı zamanda küresel anlamda büyük ekonomilerin dikkatini çekerekbölgesel bir kimlik oluşturma konusunda son derece önemli adımlar atabilmiş birteşkilattır. ASEAN’ın imzalandığı zaman zarfında bölünme ve çatışma, güneydoğuAsya bölgesini teşkil eden devletlerde her şekilde ortaya çıkmakta ve bölgeseldevletlerarası ilişkilerde yıkıcı etkiler oluşturmaktaydı. Bölge devletlerininbirçoğunun bağımsızlıklarını yeni kazanmış olmaları, sömürgeci güçlertarafından keyfi olarak çizilmiş sınırlardan kalan problemler ve uzlaşmazlıklar,güneydoğu Asya'nın bölgeselciliği yolundaki en büyük engelleri teşkiletmekteydi. Bununla birlikte bölge devletlerinin uluslararası politikaları daistikrar oluşturmaktan uzaktı. Daha geniş çerçevede ise, bölge devletlerikendilerini büyük güçler tarafından iç işlerine müdahalelerin ve Soğuk Savaşdönemi çatışmalarının hedefi ve aracı olarak görmekteydiler. ASEAN zamaniçerisinde gücünü siyasi bir güce çevirebilmiş, sağladığı platform sayesindebölgesel çatışmalar engellenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, ASEAN’ın güneydoğu Asyabölgeselciliği üzerindeki etkisi incelenecektir.

 ASEAN Güneydoğu Asya Bölgeselcilik Acharya, A. (2012). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Press. Acharya, A. (2013). The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Anthony, M. C. (2005). Regional Security in Southeast Asia : Beyond the ASEAN Way. Singapore: ISEAS Publications. ASEAN. (2012). EAS. Chairman’s Statement of the 7th East Asia Summit (EAS): https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/documents/Final_Chairman%20Statement%20of%20the%207th%20EAS%20(Final).pdf adresinden alındı ASEAN. (2016, 1 27). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia Indonesia, 24 February 1976. 1 11, 2019 tarihinde https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976/ adresinden alındı ASEAN. (2018). ARF. ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF): https://asean.org/asean-political-security-community/asean-regional-forum-arf/ adresinden alındı ASEAN. (2018). History. 01 28, 2019 tarihinde https://asean.org/asean/about-asean/history/ adresinden alındı ASEAN. (2018). Som. The 39th Meeting of the ASEAN Senior Officials: https://asean.org/39th-meeting-asean-senior-officials-drug-matters/ adresinden alındı Ayers, D. M. (2000). Anatomy of a crisis : education, development, and the state in Cambodia, 1953 –1998. Hawai, USA: University of Hawai‘i Press. Ba, A. D. (2006). Who's socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 157-179. doi:10.1080/09512740500473163 BA, A. D. (2009). (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University Press. Ball, W. M.-2. (1958, Winter, Vol. 12, No. 1). A Political Re-Examination of Seato. International Organization, 17-25. Barnett, M. N. (1998). Dialogues in Arab politics. New York: Columbia University Press. Bentley, G. C. (1986). Indigenous States of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology Volume: 15 Issues: 1 , 275-305. Buszynski, L. (2003, December). ASEAN, the Declaration on Conduct, and the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3), 343-362. Butcher, J. G. (2013). The International Court of Justice and the territorial dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(2), 235-257. Calder, K., & Ye, M. (2004). Regionalism and Critical Junctures: Explaining the "Organization Gap" in Northeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 191-226. Dosch, J., & Mols, M. (1994). Why ASEAN Co-operation Cannot Work as a Model for Regionalism Elsewhere —A Reply. Economic Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 2, 212-222. Druce, S. C., & Baikoeni, E. Y. (2016). Circumventing Conflict: The Indonesia–Malaysia Ambalat Block Dispute. M. Oishi içinde, In Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia (s. 137-156). Singapore: Springer. Elson, R. (2006). Indonesia and the West: an Ambivalent, Misunderstood Engagement. Australian Journal of Politics and History, Volume 52, Number 2, 261-271. Emmerson, D. K. (1996). Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore: A regional security core? R. J. Ellings, & S. W. Simon içinde, Southeast Asian Security in the New Millennium. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Feeney, W. R.-8. (1984). The United States and the Philippines: The Bases Dilemma. Asian Affairs, 10(4), 63-85. Gungwu, W. (2005). Nation-Building: Five Southeast Asian Histories. Singapore: ISEAS Publications. Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: identities & foreign policies. New York: Cornwell University Press. Hund, M. (2003). ASEAN Plus Three: towards a new age of pan-East Asian regionalism? A skeptic’s appraisal. The Pacific Review, 16:3, 383-417. doi:10.1080/0951274032000085644 Johnston, A. I. (2003). Socialization in international institutions: The ASEAN Way and Internatioal Relation Theory. G. J. Ikenberry, & M. Mastanduno içinde, International relations theory and the Asia-Pacific (s. 107-162). New York, USA: Columbia University Press. Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. (2002). ASEAN’s imitation community. Orbis, 93-109. Kahler, M. (2000). Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case. International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, Legalization and World Politics, 549-571. Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Regionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cooperation and Conflict , 123-159. Kaye, D. D. (2001). Beyond the Handshake. New York: Columbia University Press. Kelly, G. P. (1986, September). Coping with America: Refugees from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the 1970s and 1980s. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Immigration and American Public Policy, 487, 138-149. Khoman, T. (2012, Temmuz 9). ASEAN Conception and Evolution. Aralık 25, 2018 tarihinde ASEAN: https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-conception-and-evolution-by-thanat-khoman adresinden alındı Legro, J. W. (2000). The Transformation of Policy Ideas. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 3, 419-432. Leifer, M. (1974). Great power intervention and regional order. M. W. Zacher, & R. S. Milne içinde, Conflict and stability (s. 181-201). Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press. Michaud, J. (2006). Historical Dictionary of the Peoples of the Southeast Asian Massif. Oxford, UK: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Narine, S. (2002). Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Paul, E. (2010). Obstacles to Democratization in Southeast Asia A Study of the Nation State, Regional and Global Order. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Pub. Peffer, N. (1954). Regional Security in Southeast Asia. International Organization, Vol. 8, No. 3, 311-315. Pollard, V. K. (1970). ASA and ASEAN, 1961-1967: Southeast Asian Regionalism. Asian Survey, 10(3), 244-255. Rüland, J. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review, 13:3, 421-451. doi:10.1080/09512740050147942 Saravanamuttu, J. (1986). Imperialism, dependent development and asean regionalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 16:2, 204-222. doi:10.1080/00472338685390101 Seng, T. S., & Cossa, R. A. (2001). Rescuing realism from the realists: A theoretical note on East Asian security. S. Simon içinde, In Many faces of Asian security (s. 15-47). Lanham: MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Severino, R. C. (2008). ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Press. Smith, A. L.-7. (2002). TIMOR LESTE, TIMOR TIMUR, EAST TIMOR, TIMOR LOROSA'E: What's in a Name? Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) , 54-77. Sussman, G. (1998). Macapagal, the Sabah Claim and Maphilindo:. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 210-228. doi:10.1080/00472338380000141 Taylor, A. M. (1964). Malaysia, Indonesia - and Maphilindo. International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, 155-171. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 391-¬425. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027764 Yee, A. (1996). The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization, 69-108.