The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University

Meriç Bilgiç

doi:10.20981/kuufefd.44426

The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University

Öz

This article settles an account with the idea of “university” that has been a traditional debate in philosophy. An idea can be accepted as necessarily true by a consensus among some reasonable people, if and only if, its premises could be grounded on true knowledge, and its result could be reached by true reasoning. Then, we have three questions: What is the idea of university, why should it be necessary, and how can a norm be grounded on knowledge? Behind the idea of modern university there is a principle called “Universitas”, named “metaphysics” by Kant, and “prote philosophia” by Aristotle. The opposite of it would be postmodern university, called “multiversity” in principle. Here, we ground the norm Universitas by the logical form of reductio ad absurdum, under the light of the knowledge of the value of some possibilities of human being, or simply, of human dignity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Universitas; Multiversity; Kant; Third Generation University; Alienation

Kaynakça

ADORNO, Theodor W. (1990) Negative Dialectics. Ashton, E. B. (Ed). London: Routledge.
AQUINAS, Thomas. (1920). Summa Theologica. Part I, Volume 1, Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd.
AQUINAS, Thomas. (1922). Summa Theologica. Part I, Vol. 4, Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd.
ARISTOTELES, (1928). Metaphysica. Ross, W.D. (Ed.), The Works of Aristotle içinde. Vol. III, 2. Pub. London: Oxford University Press.
ARISTOTELES (2008). De Anima. Trans. Hicks, R.D., N.Y.: Cosimo Classics.
BARONE, CharlesA. (1985). Marxist Tought on Imperialism. N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1988). The Essence of Neoliberalism. Le Monde Diplomatique, December, 1-6.
BOWIE, Norman E. (1990). Business-University Partnerships, Cahn, M.S. (Ed.), Morality, Responsibility and the University (195- 217). Philadelphia: Temple University Presss.

CASTELLS, Manuel (2003). End of Millenium. 2. Pub. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
ÇOTUKSÖKEN, Betül (2010). İnsan Hakları ve Felsefe [Human Rights and Philosophy]. İstanbul: Papatya Yayıncılık.
DAVIDSON, Donald (2001). Inquiries intoTruth and Interpretation. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
DAVIDSON, Donald (2004). Problems of Rationality. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
DEWEY, James (1995). The Construction of Good. Cahn, S.M., & Haber, J.G. (Ed.), Twentieth Century Ethical Theory (65-80). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
European Union, The Bologna Declaration, (23.12.2012), The official pages of EU: http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/00-Main_doc/990719BOLOGNA_DECLARATION.PDF
European Union, Modernisation Agenda for universities, (23.12.2012), The official pages of EU: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0208: FIN:EN:PDF
European Union, The EU contribution to the Bologna Process, (23.12.2012), The official pages of EU: http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/doc/bologna09_en.pdf
FALLIS, George (2007). Multiversities, Ideas, and Democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
FINCHER, Cameron (2000). Recalling Karl Jaspers’ Classic: The Idea of the University. IHE Perspectives, (April), 1-6.
HABERMAS, Jurgen (1987). The Idea of the University. Trans. Blazek, J.R.. New German Critique, (Number 41), 3-22.
HEIDEGGER, Martin (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. Lovitt, W. London: Harper Torchbook.
JAMESON, Frederic (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
KANT, Immanuel (1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans: H. J. Paton. N.Y.: Harper&Row Publishers.
KANT, Immanuel (1968). Kants Werke: Akademie Textausgabe. Vol. 8. Berlin: de Gruyter.
KANT, Immanuel (1974). Logic. Trans. Hartman, R.S. & Schwarz, W.. N. Y.: Dover Publishers.
KANT, Immanuel (1983). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können /Gelecekte Bilim Olarak Ortaya Çıkabilecek Her Metafiziğe Prolegomena. Trans. Kuçuradi, İ., Örnek, Y. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
KANT, Immanuel (1992). The Conflict of the Faculties. Trans. Gragor, M.J. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
KANT, Immanuel (2000). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Guyer, P., & Wood, A. D. (Ed.). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
KRAMER, Samuel N. (1963). The Sumerians: their history, culture and character. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
KUÇURADİ, İoanna (2007). İnsan Hakları: Kavramları ve Sorunları [Human Rights: Concepts and Problems]. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları.
LYOTARD, Jean-Francois (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on. Knowledge. Trans. Bennington, G. & Massumi, B.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MARX, Karl (1963). Ekonomic and Phiosophical Manuscrits [1844], Fromm, E., Marx’s Concept of Man, (87-197)., Trans. Bottomore, T.B. 5. Pub. N.Y.: Frederick Ungar Publishing Company.
McINTYRE, Alasdair (2009). God, Philosophy, Universities. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
NAILS, Debra (2002). The people of Plato: a prosopography of Platon and other Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
PLATON, (1997). Complete Works of Plato. Cooper, J.M., (Ed). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
POPPER, Karl (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
QUINE, Willard Van Orman (1960). Word and Objects. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
RÜEG, Walter (2003). A History of the University in Europe. Rüeg, W. (Ed)., Vol. I. Cambridge, NY.: Cambridge University Press.
RUSSELL, Bertrand (1999) On Religion. NewYork: Routledge.
RUSSELL, Bertrand (2007). The Problems of Philosophy. N.Y.: Cosimo Classics.
SCOTT, Peter (1990). Knowledge and Nation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univesity Press.
WILSHIRE, Bruce W. (1990). The Moral Collapse of the University: Professionalism, Purity, and Alienation. N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
WISSEMA, Johan Gooitzen (2009). Towards the Third Generation University. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

eng

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Meriç Bilgiç

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2015

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Şubat 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Sayı: 24

DOI

https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.44426

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA94GF42DN

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bilgiç, M. (2015). The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 24, 63-90. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.44426

AMA

1.Bilgiç M. The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University. Kaygı. 2015;(24):63-90. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.44426

Chicago

Bilgiç, Meriç. 2015. “The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy 24: 63-90. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.44426.

EndNote

Bilgiç M (01 Nisan 2015) The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 24 63–90.

IEEE

[1]M. Bilgiç, “The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University”, Kaygı, sy 24, ss. 63–90, Nis. 2015, doi: 10.20981/kuufefd.44426.

ISNAD

Bilgiç, Meriç. “The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi. 24 (01 Nisan 2015): 63-90. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.44426.

JAMA

1.Bilgiç M. The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University. Kaygı. 2015;:63–90.

MLA

Bilgiç, Meriç. “The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy 24, Nisan 2015, ss. 63-90, doi:10.20981/kuufefd.44426.

Vancouver

1.Meriç Bilgiç. The Logical Limits and The Ontological Principle of The Idea of University. Kaygı. 01 Nisan 2015;(24):63-90. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.44426