Modern Devletin Geleceği: Network Devlet Biçiminin Ortaya Çıkışı İle Başarısız Devlet Söylemini Yeniden Düşünmek

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 167 - 189, 30.12.2023

Esra Güneşay Köse

Öz

Ağ teknolojisindeki gelişmelere paralel olarak devletin yapısal ve niteliksel bir dönüşüm yaşadığı tartışılmaktadır. Bir yandan sınırların buharlaşması ve karşılıklı bağımlılığın artması bu devlet yapısını giderek aşındırıyor. Öte yandan uluslararası alanda dijital bağlantıyı da güçlendiriyor. Böylece devletler küresel sorunlara çözüm bulmak amacıyla dijital ağlar oluşturmakta ve ağ devletine dönüşecek bir yapıya zemin hazırlamaktadır. Bu da küresel ağ yönetişimi ile birlikte siber güvenlik ve savunma mekanizmalarını vurgulayarak dijital egemenlik anlayışını ön plana çıkarıyor. Dahası devlet egemenliğini zayıflatan teknolojiye dayalı dönüşüm, başarısız devlet kavramını yeniden gündeme getiriyor. Temel sorunsal, devlet egemenliği dönüştükçe bu kavramın siyasi meşruiyeti nasıl etkilediğidir. Ancak dönüşüm karşısında sağlam bir siber güvenliğin ve savunma duvarının öneminin vurgulanması hem devletin ulusal bilincinin güçlenmesine yol açmakta hem de onun varoluşsal doğasına hitap etmektedir. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada başarısız devlet dönüşüm yoluyla sorunsallaştırılmakta ve nitel verilerin toplanması yoluyla teorik bir çerçevede analiz edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Network (Siber) Devlet, Dijital Egemenlik, Devlet Dönüşümü, Uluslararası Sistem, Başarısız Devlet

Kaynakça

• Acemoğlu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023). Power and progress: our thousant-year struggle over technology & prosperity. New York: Public Affairs. Alonso, A. I. (2009). E-participation and local governance: a case study. Theoretical and Emprical Researches in Urban Management, 4(3), 49-62.
• Annan, K. A. (2000). We the peoples: the role of United Nations in the 21st century. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–71.
• Avant, D., Kahler, M., Pielemeier, J., et al. (2017). Innovations in global governance: how resilient, how influential? Innovations in global governance: peace-building, human rights, internet governance and cybersecurity, and climate change (pp. 1-7). Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep29889.3.
• Axford, B., & Huggins, R. (2000). Towards a post-national polity: the emergence of the network society in Europe. The Social Review, 48, 173-206.
• Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Defining e-governance. E-Service Journal, 8(2), 3-25.
• Barilleaux, R. J. (1985). The President, ‘intermestic’ issues, and the risks of policy leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 15(4), 754–67.
• Barthwal, C. P. (2003). E-governance for good governance. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 64(3/4), 285–308.
• Batchelder, R. W., & Freudenberger, H. (1983). On the rational origins of the modern centralized state. Exploration in Economic History, 20, 1-13.
• Berger, J. (1990). Market and state in advanced capitalist societies. In Alberto Martinelli & Neil J. Smelser (Eds.), Economy and society: overviews in economic sociology (pp. 103-132). London: Sage Publications.
• Brooks, R. E. (2005). Failed states, or the state as failure? The University of Chicago Law Review, 72(4), 1159-1196.
• Bruszt, L. (2012). The State of the market: The market reform debate and postcommunist diversity. In D. Chalmers & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Problems confronting contemporary democracies: essays in honor of Alfred Stepan (pp. 111–136), University of Notre Dame Press.
• Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984). The Expansion of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Burwell, F. G., & Propp, K. (2020). The European Union and the search for digital sovereignity: building “fortress Europe” or preparing for a new world? Atlantic Council. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26697.
• Buzan, B. (2015). People, states and fear. Trans. Ed. Emre Çıtak. 2. Edt. İstanbul: International Relations Library Publications.
• Buzan, B., Weaver, O., & Wilde, J. D. (1997). Security: a new framework for analysis. USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Call, C. T. (2008). The Fallacy of the 'failed state'. Third World Quarterly, 29(8), 1491-1507.
• Castells, M. (2010). The Information age: the rise of the network society Vol. I.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
• Chandler, D. (2006). State-building states without sovereignty. In Empire in denial: the politics of state-building (pp. 26–47), Pluto Press.
• Chase-Dunn, C., & Hall, T. D. (1992). World-systems and modes of production: toward the comparative study of transformations. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 18(1), 81-117.
• Chase-Dunn, C., & Inoue, H. (2012). Accelerating democratic global state formation. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(2), 157–175.
• Chesterman, S., Ignatieff, M., & Thakur, R. (Eds.). (2005). Making states work: state failure and the crisis of governance. USA: United Nations University Press.
• Cousins, M. (2005). European welfare states: comparative perspectives. London: Sage Publications. Danyk, Y., & Briggs, C. M. (2023). Modern cognitive operations and hybrid warfare. Journal of Strategic Security, 16(1), 35–50.
• Davies, W. (2016). The neo-liberal state: power against ‘politics’. The Neo-liberal State: Power against 'politics' | Will Davies - Academia.edu. 12.6.2023.
• Dekker, B. & Okano-Heijmans, M. (2020). Europe’s digital decade?: narigating the global battle for digital supremacy (pp. 3-6). Clingendael Institute. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26543.4.
• Dorussen, H., Gartzke, E. A., & Westerwinter, O. (2016). Introduction: networked international politics: complex interdependence and the diffusion of conflict and peace. Journal of Peace Research, 53(3), 283-291.
• Egger, W. D. (2008). The Changing nature of government: network governance. In Janine O’flynn & John Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative Governance: A New Era of Public Policy in Australia, ANU Press.
• Filip, B. (2012). Polanyi and Hayek on freedom, the state, and economics. International Journal of Political Economy, 41(4), 69–87.
• Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: governance and world order in the 21st century, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Garon, J. M. (2018). Cyber-world war III: origins. Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare, 7(1), 1–60.
• Gibbins, R. (2000). Federalism in a digital world. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 667-689.
• Hacker, B. C. (1968). Greek catapults and catapult technology: science, technology, and war in the ancient world. Technology and Culture, 9(1), 34–50.
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International Organization, 63(3), 559-592.
• Hashi, M. O. (2015). The Failed-state paradigm and implications for politics and practices of international security. Bildhaan: An International Journal of Somali Studies, 14, 2015, pp. 78-94. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/bildhaan/vol14/iss1/8.
• Hayek, F. A. (1994). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Heater, D. (1996). World citizenship and goverment : cosmopolitan ideas in the history of western political thought, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations; politics, economics, culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Hobsbawm, E. J. (2008). Industry and empire. Trans. Abdullah Ersoy, Ankara: Friendly Bookstore.
• Hoffmann, S. (1961). International systems and international law. World Politics, 14(1), 205-237.
• Hogeveen, B. (Ed.), Defining e-government. In ICT for development in the Pacific Island: an assessment of e-government capabilities in Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Soloman Islands, Tonga and Vanuatu (pp. 11–14). Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
• Hollist, L., & Rosenau, J. N. (1981). World system debates. International Studies Quarterly, 25 (1), 5-17.
• Huria, S. (2008). Failing and failed states: the global discourse. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, (75), 1-4.
• Jessop, B. (2015). The State: past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity Press. vol07_08.pdf (ritsumei.ac.jp).
• Jones, C. (1993). New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe, London: Routledge.
• Kaplan, S. (2009). Identity in fragile states: social cohesion and state building. Development, 52(4), 466-472.
• Krasner, S. D. (2004). Sharing sovereignty: new institutions for collapsed and failing states. International Security, 29(2), 85-120.
• Krasner, S. D., & Pascual, C. (2005). Addressing state failure. Foreign Affairs, 84(4), 153-163.
• Löffler, E. (2003). Governance and government: networking with external stakeholders. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler, Public management and governance. London: Routledge.
• Matsumoto, N. M. (2013). Rethinking the state concept and westphalian international system in digitalized era. Rethinking The State Concept and Westphalian International System in Digitalized Era | Mert N . Matsumoto - Academia.edu. 7.06.2013.
• McCormic, J. P. (2007). Weber, Habermas and transformations of the European state: constitutional, social, and supra-national democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mitrany, D. (1948). The Functional approach to world organization. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 24(3), 350-363.
• Nay, O. (2013). Fragile and failed states: critical perspectives on conceptual hybrids. International Political Science Review, 34(3), 326-341.
• Pašagić, A. (2020, June). Failed states and terrorism: justifiability of transnational interventions from counterterrorism perspective. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(3), 19-28.
• Poggi, G. (2016). The development of the modern state, a sociological approach. 8 nd. İstanbul: İstanbul Information University Publication.
• Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Reiners, W., & Turhan, E. (Eds.). (2021). EU-Turkey relations: theories, instutions and policies, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Reitz, J. C. (2006). E-government. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 54, 733–754.
• Reno, W. (1999). Shadow states and the political economy of war. In Mats Berdal & David Malone (Eds.), Gread and grievance: economic agendas in civil wars, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Rotberg, R. I. (Ed.). (2004). When states fail: causes and consequences. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
• Russell, A. L. (2014). Cyber attacks on Estonia. In Cyber blockades (pp. 69–95), Georgetown University Press.
• Scharpf, F. (1978). Interorganizational policy studies: issues, concepts and perspectives. In K. Hanf & F. W. Scharpf (Eds.), Interorganizational policy making. London: Sage Publications.
• Scheuerman, W. E. (2015). From global governance to global stateness. In R. Schuett & P. M. R. Stirk (Eds.), The Concept of the state in international relations: philosophy, sovereignty and cosmopolitanism (pp. 187–220). Edinburgh University Press.
• Schout, A., & Luining, M. (2018). European networks, agencies and multilevel governance. In The Missing dimension in rule of law policy: from EU policies to multilevel capacity building (pp. 3–8). Clingendael Institute.
• Schubert, C. (2013). How to evaluate creative destruction: reconstructing Schumpeter's approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(2), 227-250.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149-162. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth industrial revolution. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
• Simon, J., Bass, T., Boelman, V., & Mulgan, G. (2017). Digital democracy: the tools transforming political engagement, United Kingdom: Nesta.
• Sordi, B. (2017). Revolution, rechtsstaat and the rule of law: historical reflections on the emergence and development of administrative law. Comparative Administrative Law, (97), 23-37.
• Steffek, J., Kissling, C., & Nanz, P. (2008). Civil society participation in European and global governance: a cure for the democratic deficit? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Tatum, D. S. (2021). Transformation and terror: state failure, development, and human rights. In liberalism and transformation: the global politics of violence and intervention (pp. 110–136). University of Michigan Press.
• Teşu, M. D. (2012). Developing e-government for better public services within European Union. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 7(2), 79–88.
• Tilly, C. (ed.). (1975). Reflections on the history of European state-making. In The Formation of National States in Western Europe (pp. 3-89). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Treverton, G. F. (2005). Governing the market state. In R. Klitgaard & P. C. Light (Eds.), High-performance government: structure, leadership, incentives (pp. 89–112). RAND Corporation.
• Verhulst, S. G., Noveck, B. S, Raines, J. et al. (2017). Innovations in global governance: toward a distributed internet governance ecosystem. Who runs the internet?: the global multi-stakeholder model of internet governance. Centre for International Governance Innovation, (pp. 95–117). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05243.11.
• Wahl, A., & Irons, J. (2011). The Turning Point. In The rise and fall of the welfare state (pp. 43–65). Pluto Press.
• Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: an introduction. USA: Duke University Press Books.
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of the internaional politics. London: Addison-Wesley.
• Walzer, M. (2017). Just war, unjust war. Trans. Mehmet Doğan. İstanbul: Alfa Publishing.
• Ward, H. (2012). Key concepts: sustainable development and governance. In ISO 26000 and global governance for sustainable development (pp. 38–51). International Institute for Environment and Development.
• Warning, M. J. (2009). Transnational public governance: networks, law and legitimacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.
• White, L. (1962). Medieval technology and social change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Wicker, H. R. (2004). Internal interactions between capitalism, state and nationalism. In Meral Sağır and Serkan Akıllı, Writings on political sociology, Ankara: Siyasal Publishing House.