DETERMINATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT LEVEL IN URBAN CYCLING

Abstract

In recent years, the habit of cycling has been increasing. Particularly when active mobility is gaining prominence, there is a global emphasis on healthy living and natural sustainability. Although the current rate of bicycle use in Turkey is quite low, there is significant potential for cycling in metropolitan areas and districts. The concept of bikted (Traffic Impact Level in Bicycle Usage) has been developed to enhance bicycle usage in Turkey, address infrastructure deficiencies, and ensure more comfortable cycling. This method, which consists of parameters related to traffic infrastructure, environmental factors, and user behavior, was evaluated using eight parameters in corridors and five parameters at intersections. In corridors, assessments were made for separated bicycle paths, bicycle lanes, and roads without infrastructure; at intersections, evaluations were conducted for signalized intersections, modern roundabouts, and intersections with traffic markings. In corridors; slope, noise level, curbside parking, vertical marking, surface vibration amount, main road-side road intersection situations, speed limit and bicycle-vehicle gap distance were examined. In intersections; parking at the intersection, intersection visibility, intersection crossing distance, vertical marking presence and bicycle path presence were examined. Additionally, an experimental e-bicycle was developed to aid data collection for bikted. The scoring system in the model was designed using data obtained from field studies and previous literature. For the first time in a bicycle model study, noise intensity, gap distance measurement, slope and vibration were combined for corridor assessment. Slope accounts for approximately one-third of the scoring in corridor assessments for each infrastructure type, and corridors with high slopes cannot reach the "comfortable use" classification. The measurements may not be as reliable at intersections as the numerical data analysis conducted for corridors, but they still provide valuable insights for analyzing intersections. This study aims to contribute to the current state of bicycle corridors in Turkey’s traffic infrastructure and future bicycle infrastructure projects, thereby promoting increased bicycle use. Furthermore, bikted is expected to raise awareness among local governments when planning and implementing bicycle-related projects.

Keywords

• Cycleability
• Cycling Safety
• Traffic Stress Level
• Cycling Infrastructure

Supporting Institution

Konya Teknik Üniversitesi BAP Koordinatörlüğü

Thanks

Bu makale, Sayın Hocam Prof. Dr. Osman Nuri Çelik danışmanlığında yürütülen ‘’Kentsel Bisiklet Kullanımında Trafik Etki Düzeyinin Belirlenmesi için Bir Modelin Geliştirilmesi’’ Doktora tezi çalışmasından üretilmiştir. Bu literatür çalışmasında bana desteklerini esirgemeyen Sayın Prof. Dr. Hediye Tüydeş Yaman’a teşekkürlerimi sunarım.

References

1. S. Eryiğit, “The place of the bicycle in the social dimension of sustainable transportation,”.PhD Thesis, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, 2012.
2. Konya Sustainable Urban Mobility Plahb n Project (KSHKP), Bank of Provinces, 2022.
3. A. Soni, K. Makde, K.Amrit, R. Vijay, R. Kumar. “Noise prediction and environmental noise capacity for urban traffic of Mumbai,” Applied Acoustics,jan,p. 188, 2022.
4. Turkey Urban Bicycle Transportation Strategy Plan, WRI Turkey, S-41, 2022.
5. M. Saplıoğlu, and M.M. Aydın, “Choosing safe and suitable bicycle routes to integrate cycling and public transport system,” Journal of Transport & Health, vol.10, pp.236-252, 2018.
6. V.E. Uz, and M. Karaşahin, “Bicycle in Urban Transportation,” Turkey Engineering News, Urban Transportation, vol: 429, no.1, pp. 41-46, 2004.
7. S. Dündar, G. Günay, P.A. Gezginci, E. Soyer, and E. Mert, Modeling the demand for shared bicycle use. 14th Transportation Congress, İstanbul, Turkey, 2023.
8. K. Mert and E. V. Öcalır Akünal, “A comparison of the planning and applicatıon processes bicycle transportation in Konya,” Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture , vol.27, no.1, pp.223-240, 2010.

9. S. Mansuroğlu, and V. Dağ, User Approaches to Bicycle Use and Bicycle Paths in Urban Transportation: Antalya Example, City Academy, vol.14, no 1, pp. 90-101. 2021.
10. L. Olmos, M. Tadeo, D. Vlachogiannis, F. Alhasoun, X. Alegre, C. Ochoa, F. Targa, and M. Gonzales, “A data science framework for planning the growth of bicycle İnfrastructures,” Transportation Research Part C 115,jun,pp.112,2020.
11. G. Barero, and A. Rodriguez-Valencia, “Asking the user: a perceptional approach for bicycle infrastructure design,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol.16:3, no.1, pp. 246-257,2022.
12. N. Fournier, S. Bakhtiari,Valluru, N. Campbell, E. Christofa, S. Roberts, and M. Knodler, “Accounting for drivers’ bicycling frequency and familiarity with bicycle infrastructure treatments when evaluating safety,” Accident Analysis and Prevention,Feb.,pp. 137, 2020.
13. R. Stülpnagel, and N. Binnig, ‘’How safe do you feel? A large-scale survey concerning the subjective safety associated with different kinds of cycling lanes,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Mar.,pp. 167, 2022.
14. C. Zhao, T. Carstensen, T. Nielsen, and T. Olafsson, “Bicycle-friendly infrastructure planning in Beijing and Copenhagen between adapting design solutions and learning local planning cultures,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 68, no.1, pp. 149-159, 2018.
15. L. Wysling, and R. Purves, “Where to improve cycling infrastructure? Assessing bicycle suitability and bikeability with open data in the city of Paris,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Feb, pp. 15, 2022.
16. B. Janssen, P. Schepers, H. Farah, and M. Hagenzieker, “Behaviour of cyclists and pedestriansnear right angled, sloped and levelled kerb types: Do risks associated to height differences of kerbs weigh up against other factors?,” Etjır, vol.18, no.1, pp. 360-371, 2018.
17. O’Holleran C, and Hull A,’’Bicycle infrastructure: can good design encourage cycling?,’’ Urban, Planning and Transport Research, vol. 2, no.1, pp.369-406, 2014.
18. A. Knight, and S. Charlton, “Protected and unprotected cycle lanes’ effects on cyclists’ behaviour,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Jun, pp. 171, 2022.
19. P. Koh, and D. Wong, “Influence of infrastructural compatibility factors on walking and cycling route choices,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.36, no.2, pp. 202-213, 2013.
20. A. Karakaya, T. Ritter, F. Biessmann, and D. Bermbach, “CycleSense: Detecting near miss incidents in bicycle traffic from mobile motion sensors,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, Apr, pp. 90, 2023.
21. P. Furth, B. Sadeghinasr, and L. Moreno, “Slope stress criteria as a complement to traffic stress criteria, and impact on high comfort bicycle accessibility,” Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol.112, 2023.
22. N. Kovacsova, W. Valkveld, J. Winter, and M. Hagenzieker “PC-based hazard anticipation training for experienced cyclists: Design and evaluation,” Safety Science, Dec, pp.1-16, 2020.
23. G. Boisjoly, U. Lachapelle, and A. Geneidy, “Bicycle network performance: Assessing the directness of bicycle facilities through connectivity measures, a Montreal, Canada case study,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Apr, pp.1-15, 2019.
24. J. Bosen, H. Fuchte, and C. Scholten, “Cycling to work and making cycling work: What makes committed utility cyclists despite perceived risks of air pollution and traffic?,” Journal of Transport & Health, vol. 28, no.1, pp.101519, 2023.
25. N. Ferenchak, and W. Marshall, “Traffic safety for all road users: A paired comparison study of small & mid-sized U.S. cities with high/low bicycling rates,” Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 100010, 2024.
26. S. Useche, L. Montoro, J. Sanmartin, and F. Alonso, “Healthy but risky: A descriptive study on cyclists’ encouraging and discouraging factors for using bicycles, habits and safety outcomes,” Transportation Research Part, vol. 62, no. F, pp. 587–598. 2019.
27. P. Apparicio, M. Carrier, J. Gelb, A. Seguin, and S. Kingham, “Cyclists’ exposure to air pollution and road traffic noise in central city neighbourhoods of Montreal,’’ Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 57, pp. 63-69, 2016. H. Ising, and B. Kruppa, ‘’Health Effects caused by Noise: Evidence in the Literature from the Past 25 Years,’’, Noise- Health, vol.6, no.22, pp. 5-13, 2004.
28. A. Soni, K. Makde, K. Amrit, R. Vijay, and R. Kumar “Noise prediction and environmental noise capacity for urban traffic of Mumbai,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 188, no.3, pp. 108516, 2022.
29. P. Begou, P. Kassomenos, and A. Kelessis, ‘’Dataset on the road traffic noise measurements in the municipality of Thessaloniki,’’ Data in brief, vol.29, pp. 105214, 2020.
30. P. Apparicio, and J. Gelb, ‘’Cyclists’ Exposure to Road Traffic Noise: A Comparison of Three North American and European Cities,’’ Acoustics 2020, vol. 2, pp. 73–86. 2020.
31. J. Gao, A. Sha, Y. Huang, L. Hu, Z. Tong, and W. Jiang, ‘’Evaluating the cycling comfort on urban roads based on cyclists’ perception of vibration,’’ Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.192, pp. 531-541, 2018.
32. M. Olieman, R. Perianu, and M. Perianu, ‘’Measurement of dynamic comfort in cycling using wireless acceleration sensors,’’ Procedia Engineering, vol. 34, pp. 568-573, 2012.
33. H. Gomes, and D. Savionek, ‘’Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to vibration transmitted to hand-arm system during leisure cyclist activity,’’ Brazılıan Journal of Medıcal Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 291-300, 2014.
34. A. Bergström, and R. Magnusson. ’’Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter,’’ Transportation Research Part A, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 649–666, 2003.
35. J. Mackenzie, J. Dutschke, and G. Ponte, ‘’An investigation of cyclist passing distances in the Australian Capital Territory,’’ Accident Analysis and Prevention, May, 2021.
36. B.Beck,D.Chong,D.J.Olivier,J.Perkins,M.Tsay,A.Rushford,A.Li,L.Cameron,P.Fry,R.Johnson, ‘’How much space do drivers provide when passing cyclists? Understanding the impact of motor vehicle and infrastructure characteristics on passing distance,’’ Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.128, pp. 253-260, 2019.
37. I. Walker, ‘’Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender,’’Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 39, no.2, pp. 417–425, 2007.
38. R. Stülpnagel, R. Hologa, and N. Riachi, ‘’Cars overtaking cyclists on different urban road types Expectations about passing safety are not aligned with observed passing distances,’’ Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 89, pp. 334-346, 2022.
39. P. Apasnore, ‘’Bicycle-Vehicle Interactions at Mid-Sections of Mixed Traffic Streets: Examining Passing Distance and Bicycle Comfort Perception’’, M.S. thesis, Carleton University, Carleton, Canada, 2016.
40. M. Moller, S. Useche, F. Siebert, and K. Janstrup, ‘’What differentiates e-bike riders from conventional cyclists in Denmark? A user-based study,’’ Journal of Transport & Health, vol. 34, 2024.
41. J. Xu, C. Ji, B. Li, P. Jiang, K. Qin, Z. Ni, X. Huang, R. Zhong, L. Fang, M. Zhao, ‘’Riding practices of e-bike riders after the implementation of electric bike management regulations: An observational study in Hangzhou, China,’’, Heliyon, Feb, 2024.
42. J. Kruijf, D. Lierop, D. Ettema, M. Kroesen, and M. Dijst, ‘’E-cycling intention versus behavioral change: Investigating longitudinal changes in e-cycling intention and actual behavior change in daily commuting,’’ Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research, Dec, 2024.
43. L. Bai, and N. Sze, “Red light running behavior of bicyclists in urban area: Effects of bicycle type and bicycle group size,” Travel Behaviour and Society, vol. 21, pp. 226–234, 2020.
44. P. Singleton, and N. Poudel “Bicycling comfort at roundabouts: Effects of design and situational factors,” Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 94, pp. 227–242, 2023.
45. L. Deeter, D. Hurwitz, B. Russo, E. Smaglig, and S. Kothuri, ‘’Assessing the impact of three intersection treatments on bicyclist safety using a bicycling simulator,’’ Accident Analysis and Prevention, Jan, 2023.
46. S. Zangenehpour, J. Strauss, L. Moreno, and N. Saunier, ‘’Are signalized intersections with cycle tracks safer? A case–controlstudy based on automated surrogate safety analysis using video data Sohail,’’ Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 86, pp. 161–172, 2016.
47. A. Mohammadi, G. Piccinini, and M. Dozza, ‘’How do cyclists interact with motorized vehicles at unsignalized intersections? Modeling cyclists’ yielding behavior using naturalistic data,’’ Accident Analysis and Prevention, Sep, pp. 1-8, 2023.
48. A. Ng, A. Debnath, and K. Heesch, ‘’Cyclist’ safety perceptions of cycling in frastructure at un-signalised intersections: Cross-sectional survey of Queensland cyclists,’’ Journal of Transport&Health, vol. 6, pp. 13–22, 2017.
49. K. Gomez, and M. Castro, ‘’Analysis of sight distances at urban intersections from a vulnerable users’ approach: A case study,’’ Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 45, pp. 226–233, 2020.
50. A. Sorton and T. Walsh, ‘’Cycling Stress Level as a Tool to Evaluate Urban and Suburban Cycling Compatibility,’’ Transportation Research Record, vol. 1438, pp.17-24, 1994.
51. M. Mekuria, P. Furth, and H. Nixon ‘’Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectitivity,’’ Report, pp. 11-19, Mineta Transportation Institute College of BusinessSan José State University, 2012.
52. L. Hagen, and K. Ralph, ‘’Will parents let their children bike on ‘‘low stress” streets? Validating level of traffic stress for biking,’’ Transportation Research, vol. 65, pp. 280–291, 2019.
53. K. Wang, G. Akar, K. Lee, and M. Sanders, ‘’Commuting patterns and bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS): Insights from spatially aggregated data in Franklin County,’’ Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 86, 2020.
54. C. Bearn, C. Mingus, and K. Watkins, ‘’An adaption of the level of traffic stress based on evidence from the literature and widely available data,’’ Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 29, pp. 50–62, 2018.
55. A. Imani, E. Miller, and S. Saxe, ‘’Cycle accessibility and level of traffic stress: A case study of Toronto,’’ Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 80, no.2, 2019.
56. Urban design consultancy based in Copenhagen, Brussels and Montréal.’’Copenhagenize Index 2019’’. Available:https://copenhagenizeindex.eu/cities/copenhagen.[Accessed: Nov. 12, 2019].
57. J. Querg, A. Keler, and G. Grigoropoulos, “The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability”, Sustainability, vol. 13, pp. 428, 2021.
58. B. Landis, V. Vattikuti, and M. Brannick “Real-Time Human Perceptions Toward a Bicycle Level of Service,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1578, pp.119-126, 1997.
59. D. Harkey, D. Reinfut, and M. Knuiman, ‘’Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index,’’ Transportation Research Record, vol. 1636, pp. 13-20, 1998.
60. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Bicycle Lanes Regulation, vol. 30976, p.9, 12 Dec 2019.
61. J. Bosen, H. Fuchte, and C. Scholten, ‘’Cycling to work and making cycling work: What makes committed utility cyclists despite perceived risks of air pollution and traffic?,’’Journal of Transport & Health, vol. 28, p. 101519, 2023.
62. P. Apparicio, M. Carrier, J. Gelb, A. Seguin, and S. Kingham, ‘’Cyclists’ exposure to air pollution and road traffic noise in central city neighbourhoods of Montreal,’’ Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 57, pp. 63-69, 2016.
63. H. Ising, and B. Kruppa, ‘’Health Effects caused by Noise: Evidence in the Literature from the Past 25 Years,’’ Noise- Health, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 5-13, 2004.
64. J. Gelb, and P. Appricio, ‘’Cyclists’ exposure to air and noise pollution, comparative approach in seven cities,’’ Transportation Research disciplinary Perspectives, vol. 14, 2022.
65. P. Valenzuela, M. March, X. Muriel, M. Zabala, A. Lucia, J. Pallares, D. Barranco-Gil, ‘’Road gradient and cycling power: An observational study in male professional cyclists,’’ Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1017-1022, 2022.
66. P. Furth, B. Sadeghinasr, and L. Moreno, ‘’Slope stress criteria as a complement to traffic stress criteria, and impact on high comfort bicycle accessibility,’’ Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 112, p.103708, 2023.
67. Morrisson, C., Thompson, J., Kondo, M., Beck, B. 2019, On-road bicycle lane types, roadway characteristics, and risks for bicycle crashes, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 123, 123-131.