Research Article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS

Volume: 13 Number: 1 March 1, 2025
EN

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS

Abstract

Gearbox, which is one of the most important and frequently used components among mechanical power transmission systems, has often been observed to occur in gear surface pitting faults in industrial applications that require high torque. For the diagnosis of gear pitting faults, vibration analysis is one of the commonly utilized techniques. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in applying deep learning approaches for classification and learning feature representations. Deep learning provides an excellent opportunity to integrate vibration signals for gear pitting fault diagnosis. Therefore, in this study, autoencoder models Contractive Autoencoder (CAE), Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) and Variational Autoencoder (VAE) are used to extract deep feature representations of gear pitting data. Without using any additional feature extraction techniques, in this study uses the raw vibrational data directly to identify the local gear pitting faults. Experimental results have shown that Sparse Autoencoder is a viable and efficient feature extraction method and provides a new research method for gear pit fault diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Öztürk, M. Sabuncu, and I. Yesilyurt, "Early detection of pitting damage in gears using mean frequency of scalogram," J. Vib. Control, vol. 14, 2008, pp. 469–484.
  2. M. Amarnath and S. K. Lee, "Assessment of surface contact fatigue failure in a spur geared system based on the tribological and vibration parameter analysis," Measurement, vol. 76, 2015, pp. 32–44.
  3. S. Bagavathiappan, B. B. Lahiri, T. Saravanan, et al., "Infrared thermography for condition monitoring – a review," Infrared Phys. Technol., vol. 60, 2013, pp. 35–55.
  4. Z. Peng, N. J. Kessissoglou, and M. Cox, "A study of the effect of contaminant particles in lubricants using wear debris and vibration condition monitoring techniques," Wear, vol. 258, 2005, pp. 1651–1662.
  5. Y. E. Karabacak and N. G. Özmen, "Common spatial pattern-based feature extraction and worm gear fault detection through vibration and acoustic measurements," Measurement, vol. 187, 2022.
  6. B. Hizarci, R. C. Ümütlü, H. Ozturk, and Z. Kıral, "Vibration region analysis for condition monitoring of gearboxes using image processing and neural networks," Exp. Tech., vol. 43, no. 6, 2019, pp. 739–755.
  7. T. Toutountzakis, K. T. Chee, and M. David, "Application of acoustic emission to seeded gear fault detection," NDT E Int., vol. 38, no. 1, 2005, pp. 27–36.
  8. K. Worden and J. M. Dulieu-Barton, "An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures," Struct. Health Monit., vol. 3, no. 1, 2004, pp. 85–98.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Dynamics, Vibration and Vibration Control

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 1, 2025

Submission Date

October 21, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 20, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 13 Number: 1

APA
Yurtsever, M., Ümütlü, R. C., & Öztürk, H. (2025). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 13(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1571234
AMA
1.Yurtsever M, Ümütlü RC, Öztürk H. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS. KONJES. 2025;13(1):59-73. doi:10.36306/konjes.1571234
Chicago
Yurtsever, Mustafa, Rafet Can Ümütlü, and Hasan Öztürk. 2025. “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 13 (1): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1571234.
EndNote
Yurtsever M, Ümütlü RC, Öztürk H (March 1, 2025) A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 13 1 59–73.
IEEE
[1]M. Yurtsever, R. C. Ümütlü, and H. Öztürk, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS”, KONJES, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–73, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.36306/konjes.1571234.
ISNAD
Yurtsever, Mustafa - Ümütlü, Rafet Can - Öztürk, Hasan. “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 13/1 (March 1, 2025): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1571234.
JAMA
1.Yurtsever M, Ümütlü RC, Öztürk H. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS. KONJES. 2025;13:59–73.
MLA
Yurtsever, Mustafa, et al. “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 59-73, doi:10.36306/konjes.1571234.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Yurtsever, Rafet Can Ümütlü, Hasan Öztürk. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIVERSE AUTOENCODER MODELS IN LOCAL GEAR PITTING FAULT DIAGNOSIS. KONJES. 2025 Mar. 1;13(1):59-73. doi:10.36306/konjes.1571234

Cited By