SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT SOIL TYPES WITH EQUIVALENT LINEAR ANALYSIS METHOD

Abstract

In this study; With DEEPSOIL v7 software, seismic behavior analyzes of a region were made with 1D, “Equivalent Linear Analysis Method”. The method that offers the closest solution to the reality in the solution of engineering problems is the nonlinear solution method. However, it is very difficult to obtain and analyze the necessary parameters. For this reason, this method was chosen, which is not difficult to solve and gives the closest results to the nonlinear solution. Analyzes were made in the direction of whether the soil profile will absorb the earthquake in the event of a possible earthquake or, on the contrary, will increase the earthquake effect and transmit it to the building foundation. As a result of the analysis, the peak acceleration values were calculated and defined with acceleration-time-depth graphs. In this study, in which the seismic responses of different types of soil structures were investigated, it was observed that the soil structure was non-linear, the shear wave velocity value was an important parameter in determining the dynamic behavior of the soil, and the damping ratio of the soil increased with the increase in the shear wave velocity value.

Keywords

• Earthquake
• Equivalent Linear Analysis Method
• Shear Wave Velocity

References

1. Y. M. A. Hashash, M. I. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, I. Okan, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips and D. Park, DEEPSOIL v7.0. User Manual, Urbana-Champaing, 2017.
2. G. Ç İnce, “Seismic zoning and earthquake damage estimation of İstanbul” PhD thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Instute of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 2005.
3. P. Kale, “Investigation of local terrain effects with one and two dimensional analysis” Master thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, 2008.
4. M. Karasu, “Microzonation of Bakırköy district” Master thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, 2009.
5. D. Basu and A. Dey, “Comparative 1D ground response analysis of homogeneous sandy stratum using linear”, Equivalent Linear and Nonlinear Massing Approaches, Geotechnical Society, 2016. E. Civelekler, V. Okur and B. Kamil, “Evaluation of dynamic behavior of soil by equivalent analysis method, Eskişehir Example” Special Issue of 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Volume:6, pp.124-132, 2018.
6. C. Aydın, “One-dimensional seismic ground response analysis of a thick compacted clayey soil layer with determined dynamic properties” Master thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 2018.
7. M. U. Yılmazoğlu and O. Bayraktar, “Investigation of the effect of topographic features on dynamic behavior of soil by one dimensional analysis methods”, 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Strudies, 2018.
8. R. Bozkurt and A. Demiröz, Investigation of soil dynamic behavior in Aksaray Hamidiye region by using equivalent linear analysis method, Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8(3), 643-651, 2020.

9. R. Bozkurt and A. Demiröz, “Investigation of seismicity of homogeneous sandy layer using equivalent linear analysis method”, International Engineering Symposium (IES’20), pp.118-127, Full Paper-Oral Presentation, İzmir, 2020.
10. R. Bozkurt and A. Demiröz, The effect of changing parameters on soil settlement behavior in single pile foundation systems. Engineering Applications, 3(3), 248-259, 2024.
11. A. Demiröz and R. Bozkurt, Investigation of soil dynamic behavior by using equivalent linear analysis method: Example of Aksaray Doğantarla. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 160-171, 2020.
12. A. Demiröz and F. Yıldız, Investigation of the dynamic behavior of soils of Konya Organized Industrial Zone by equivalent linear analysis method, 2021.
13. S. L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, Nj, USA, 1996.
14. K. D. Pitilakis, Site Effect 5, In: A., Ansal, Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 139-197, 2004.
15. P. Arduino and S. L. Kramer, Site Response, In: CEE 526 Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Lecture Notes, University of Washington, Seattle, WA-USA, 2009.
16. C. Phillips and Y. M. Hashash, Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(7), p. 1143-1158, 2009.
17. E. Civelekler, “Determination of dynamic behavior of soils by equivalent and nonlinear analysis methods” PhD Thesis, Osmangazi University, Institute of Science, Eskişehir, 2020.
18. C. Bolisetti, A. S. Whittaker, H. B. Mason, I. Almufti and M. Willford, Equivalent linear and nonlinear site response analysis for design and risk assessment of safety-related nuclear structures, Nuclear Engineering And Design, 275, p. 107-121, 2014.
19. J. P. Pruiksma, Nonlinear and equivalent linear site response analysis for the Groningen Area TNO Report, TN02016R10460, p. 1-30, 2016.