ENERGY-EFFICIENT RETROFITTING IN COMPLEX UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS: ENERGY CONSUMPTION, EXERGY LOSS, ENTROPY GENERATION AND LIFE CYCLE GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSES

Abstract

This study examines the impact of energy-efficient renovation and reinforcement of the building envelope on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences building at Balikesir University, a complex structure constructed in 1994. Energy consumption was evaluated through EnergyPlus simulations based on the thermal transmittance values recommended in TS 825:2013, which largely reflects the characteristics of the existing building stock in Turkey. The building includes various functional spaces such as classrooms, offices, laboratories, and storage areas, with window-to-wall ratios ranging from 13.6% to 38.02%, a total external wall area of 15,986 square meters, and a window area of 4,796 square meters. Fifteen renovation scenarios were analysed, involving upgrades to external walls, floors, ceilings, and windows in line with TS 825 standards. Each scenario was assessed for its effect on heating, cooling, and annual energy consumption. In addition, the exergy loss and entropy generation associated with energy consumption were calculated for the building envelope. The building operates with a central system, employing a natural gas boiler for heating and an air-cooled chiller for cooling. Finally, a ten-year life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions was carried out using natural gas and electricity to assess environmental sustainability. The maximum reduction in energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, amounting to 45%, was achieved when all building envelope components were upgraded. The difference in exergy loss and entropy generation between the current case and the most efficient scenario was calculated as 58% during the heating period and 52% during the cooling period.

Keywords

• Building Envelope Effect
• Entropy Generation
• EnergyPlus
• Exergy loss
• Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis (LCGA)

References

1. J. Hu and X. Yu, “Thermo and light-responsive building envelope: Energy analysis under different climate conditions,” Solar Energy, vol. 193, pp. 866–877, Oct. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.108.
2. F. Shadram, S. Bhattacharjee, S. Lidelöw, J. Mukkavaara, and T. Olofsson, “Exploring the trade-off in life cycle energy of building retrofit through optimization,” Applied Energy, vol. 269, p. 115083, May 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115083.
3. A. Rogeau, R. Girard, Y. Abdelouadoud, M. Thorel, and G. Kariniotakis, “Joint optimization of building-envelope and heating-system retrofits at territory scale to enhance decision-aiding,” Applied Energy, vol. 264, p. 114639, Feb. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114639.
4. H. Radhi, “Evaluating the potential impact of global warming on the UAE residential buildings – A contribution to reduce the CO2 emissions,” Building and Environment, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2451–2462, Apr. 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.006.
5. X. Zhang and F. Wang, “Life-cycle assessment and control measures for carbon emissions of typical buildings in China,” Building and Environment, vol. 86, pp. 89–97, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.003.
6. J. I. Levy, M. K. Woo, and Y. Tambouret, “Energy savings and emissions reductions associated with increased insulation for new homes in the United States,” Building and Environment, vol. 96, pp. 72–79, Nov. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.11.008.
7. C. Ismailos and M. F. Touchie, “Achieving a low carbon housing stock: An analysis of low-rise residential carbon reduction measures for new construction in Ontario,” Building and Environment, vol. 126, pp. 176–183, Sep. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.034.
8. F. Aldawi, F. Alam, A. Date, M. Alghamdi, and F. Aldhawi, “A new house wall system for residential buildings,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 67, pp. 403–418, Aug. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.019.

9. B. Rosselló-Batle, C. Ribas, A. Moià-Pol, and V. Martínez-Moll, “An assessment of the relationship between embodied and thermal energy demands in dwellings in a Mediterranean climate,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 109, pp. 230–244, Oct. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.007.
10. A. Invidiata and E. Ghisi, “Impact of climate change on heating and cooling energy demand in houses in Brazil,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 130, pp. 20–32, Jul. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.067.
11. A. Charles, W. Maref, and C. M. Ouellet-Plamondon, “Case study of the upgrade of an existing office building for low energy consumption and low carbon emissions,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 183, pp. 151–160, Oct. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.008
12. M. K. Urbikain, “Energy efficient solutions for retrofitting a residential multi-storey building with vacuum insulation panels and low-E windows in two European climates,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 269, p. 121459, Apr. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121459.
13. M. Belucio, C. Rodrigues, C. H. Antunes, F. Freire, and L. C. Dias, “Eco-efficiency in early design decisions: A multimethodology approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 283, p. 124630, Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124630.
14. F. Aldawi, A. Date, F. Alam, I. Khan, and M. Alghamdi, “Energy efficient residential house wall system,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 58, no. 1–2, pp. 400–410, Apr. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.023.
15. N. Chalfoun, “Greening University Campus Buildings to Reduce Consumption and Emission while Fostering Hands-on Inquiry-based Education,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 288–297, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.036.
16. I. Baran, L. Dumitrescu, and R. A. Pescaru, “Thermal rehabilitation technology and the nearly Zero-Energy buildings. Romanian Representative Education Buildings-Case Study,” Procedia Technology, vol. 22, pp. 358–364, Jan. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.024.
17. S. M. Hosseini, R. Shirmohammadi, and A. Aslani, “Achieving to a low carbon-energy commercial building in the hot-dry climate area,” Energy Sources Part a Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects, pp. 1–19, Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1826013.
18. U. Y. A. Tettey and L. Gustavsson, “Primary energy and CO2 emissions implications of different insulation, cladding and frame materials for residential buildings,” IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 297, no. 1, p. 012020, Aug. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012020.
19. Y. Hossain and T. Marsik, “Conducting life cycle assessments (LCAs) to determine carbon payback: a case study of a Highly Energy-Efficient house in rural Alaska,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1732, May 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091732.
20. J. Adamczyk and R. Dylewski, “Ecological and economic benefits of the ‘Medium’ level of the building Thermo-Modernization: a case study in Poland,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 4509, Sep. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13174509.
21. M. V. Rodríguez, A. S. Cordero, S. G. Melgar, and J. M. A. Márquez, “Impact of global warming in subtropical climate buildings: Future trends and mitigation strategies,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 23, p. 6188, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236188.
22. W. Jezierski, B. Sadowska, and K. Pawłowski, “Impact of changes in the required thermal insulation of building envelope on energy demand, heating costs, emissions, and temperature in buildings,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 56, Dec. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010056.
23. C. N. N. Tran, V. W. Y. Tam, K. N. Le, and I. M. C. S. Illankoon, “Environmental impacts assessment for Australian buildings: thermal resistance and environmental impacts relationship,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 243–252, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1858522.
24. E. L. A. Da Guarda, R. M. A. Domingos, E. Gabriel, L. C. Durante, J. V. R. Moreira, and J. C. M. Sanches, “Use of thermal insulation in the envelope to mitigate energy consumption in the face of climate change for mid-western Brazil,” IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 410, no. 1, p. 012009, Jan. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012009.
25. O. Kon, İ. Caner, and N. İlten, “Life cycle assessment of energy-efficient improvement for external walls of hospital building,” International Journal of Global Warming, vol. 25, no. 3/4, p. 408, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgw.2021.119009.
26. C. H. Lozinsky and M. F. Touchie, “Improving energy model calibration of multi-unit residential buildings through component air infiltration testing,” Building and Environment, vol. 134, pp. 218–229, Feb. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.040.
27. C. Rodrigues and F. Freire, “Environmental impact trade-offs in building envelope retrofit strategies,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 557–570, Mar. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1064-2.
28. V. Chandrasekaran, J. Dvarioniene, A. Vitkute, and G. Gecevicius, “Environmental Impact Assessment of Renovated Multi-Apartment Building Using LCA Approach: Case Study from Lithuania,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1542, Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031542.
29. E. Van De Moortel, K. Allacker, F. De Troyer, L. Stijnen, and E. Schoofs, “Life cycle environmental impact of refurbishment of social housing,” IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 323, no. 1, p. 012013, Aug. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012013.
30. S. Abasnezhad, N. Soltani, E. Markarian, H. A. Fakhim, and H. Khezerloo, “Impact of building design parameters precision on heating and cooling load calculations,” Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 741–749, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13106.
31. C. Miller, D. Thomas, J. Kämpf, and A. Schlueter, “Urban and building multiscale co-simulation: case study implementations on two university campuses,” Journal of Building Performance Simulation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 309–321, Jul. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2017.1354070.
32. A.-A. Khalil, M. Fikry, and W. Abdeaal, “High technology or low technology for buildings envelopes in residential buildings in Egypt,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 3779–3792, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.11.001.
33. S. B. M. Ali, M. Hasanuzzaman, N. A. Rahim, M. A. A. Mamun, and U. H. Obaidellah, “Analysis of energy consumption and potential energy savings of an institutional building in Malaysia,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 805–820, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.010.
34. A. H. Neto and F. A. S. Fiorelli, “Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2169–2176, Jan. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.06.013.
35. M. Jradi, C. Veje, and B. N. Jørgensen, “Deep energy renovation of the Mærsk office building in Denmark using a holistic design approach,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 151, pp. 306–319, Jun. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.047.
36. M. A. William, A. M. Elharidi, A. A. Hanafy, A. Attia, and M. Elhelw, “Energy-efficient retrofitting strategies for healthcare facilities in hot-humid climate: Parametric and economical analysis,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 4549–4562, Sep. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.011.
37. C. J. Bay, R. Chintala, and B. P. Rasmussen, “Steady-State predictive optimal control of integrated building energy systems using a mixed economic and occupant comfort focused objective function,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2922, Jun. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112922.
38. R. Sharston and S. Murray, “The combined effects of thermal mass and insulation on energy performance in concrete office buildings,” Advances in Building Energy Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 322–337, Feb. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2018.1547220.
39. S. S. Shanbhag and M. K. Dixit, “A review of evolving climate and energy economy trends to enhance the dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 111, p. 105560, Jun. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105560.
40. S. S. Shanbhag and M. K. Dixit, “Integrating evolving energy economy scenarios in dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 112, p. 107772, Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107772.
41. I. Caner and O. Kon, “The life cycle assessment related to insulation thickness of external walls of the airport,” International Journal of Sustainable Aviation, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 158, Jan. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsa.2019.10023158.
42. O. Kon and İ. Caner, “Life cycle cost analysis of the buildings in Turkey related to energy consumption due to external wall insulation,” in Green energy and technology, 2019, pp. 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_6.
43. F. Greer, P. Raftery, and A. Horvath, “Considerations for estimating operational greenhouse gas emissions in whole building life-cycle assessments,” Building and Environment, vol. 254, p. 111383, Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111383.
44. S. J. McLaren et al., “Policy implications of time-differentiated climate change analysis in life cycle assessment of building elements in Aotearoa New Zealand,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02444-9.
45. A. Rico, V. J. Ovejas, and A. Cuadras, “Analysis of energy and entropy balance in a residential building,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 333, p. 130145, Dec. 2021, https://doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130145.
46. M. Kaplan and M. S. Büker, “Packaged cogeneration Systems For Energy Productıon In The Residential Buildings – A Case Study In Konya,” Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 749–767, Dec. 2019, https://doi: 10.36306/konjes.654923.
47. O. Kon and K. Sandal, “Energy consumption analyses and temperature damping factor based on surface properties of exterior walls of buildings,” Journal of Innovations in Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 49–69, Dec. 2023, https://doi: 10.60093/jiciviltech.1381812.
48. Kılıçlı, A. "Ege Üniversitesi bünyesindeki mevcut bir binanın enerji-ekserji analizi ve iyileştirme önerileri." Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Ege Üniversitesi, 2018.
49. Sevim, S. "Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi rektörlük binası ısıtma ve soğutma sisteminin enerji ve ekserji analizi" Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, 2019.
50. Yılmaz, Mehmet. "Uluslararasi Kıbrıs Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ yerleşkesi̇ güneş enerji̇ santralleri̇ni̇n ekserji̇ anali̇zi̇." (2023).
51. Baldvinsson, I, "Development of a Community Heat Supply System towards Increased Sustainability" Doctoral Thesis, University of Tohoku, 2016.
52. G. Evola, V. Costanzo, and L. Marletta, “Exergy analysis of energy systems in buildings,” Buildings, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 180, Dec. 2018, https://doi:10.3390/buildings8120180.
53. I. Dincer and Y. A. Cengel, “Energy, entropy and exergy concepts and their roles in thermal engineering,” Entropy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 116–149, Aug. 2001, https://doi:10.3390/e3030116.
54. G. P. Hammond, “Engineering sustainability: thermodynamics, energy systems, and the environment,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 613–639, May 2004, https://doi:10.1002/er.988.
55. P. Gonçalves, A. R. Gaspar, and M. G. Da Silva, “Energy and exergy-based indicators for the energy performance assessment of a hotel building,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 52, pp. 181–188, Jun. 2012, https://doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.06.011. Y. A. Çengel ve M. A. Boles, Mühendislik Yaklaşımıyla Termodinamik, 8. Baskı. Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık, 2019.
56. I. Caner, “Comparative study of overheating assessment approaches in university buildings: impact of different climate zones and shading devices in Turkey,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 99, p. 111536, Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111536.
57. TS 825, Thermal insulation requirements for buildings. Ankara, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.tse.org.tr/. [Accessed: Apr. 12, 2025]. Balikesir University Construction Works Technical Department data. [Online]. Available: https://www.balikesir.edu.tr/. [Accessed: Apr. 12, 2025].
58. Designbuilder Toolbox (EnergyPlus Model). [Online]. Available: https://designbuilder.co.uk/. [Accessed: Apr. 12, 2025]. Y. Yılmaz and G. K. Oral, “Bir ortaokul binasının maliyet ve enerji etkin yenilenmesi için bir yaklaşım,” Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 2018, no. 2018, Apr. 2018, https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.416503.
59. M. Altun Et Al. , "Effect of envelope insulation on building heating energy requirement, cost and carbon footprint from a life-cycle perspective," Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, vol.35, no.1, pp.147-163, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.445751.
60. A. Atmaca and N. Atmaca, “Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 102, pp. 417–431, Jun. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.008.
61. Molenbroek, Edith, et al. Savings and benefits of global regulations for energy efficient products. A “cost of non-world” study [Internet] European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/document/download/d69dd0ed-0152-4a0e-8ee0-d7ed4567b21d_en? filename=Cost%20of%20Non-World%20-%20Exec%20Summary.pdf&prefLang=es. [Accessed: Apr. 20, 2025].
62. Rajulwar, Vaishnavi Vijay. ‘’Decarbonization of Steel and Comparative Analysis With Alternative Materials’’. 2023. Master's Thesis. Arizona State University.
63. F. deLlano-Paz, A. Calvo-Silvosa, S. I. Antelo, and I. Soares, “Power generation and pollutant emissions in the European Union: A mean-variance model,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 181, pp. 123–135, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.108.
64. Turkish State Meteorological Service data, [Online].
65. Available: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx. [Accessed Oct. 12, 2025].