Research Article

COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE

Volume: 13 Number: 4 December 1, 2025
EN

COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE

Abstract

The dynamic nature of climate is shaped by interactions among meteorological parameters such as humidity, temperature, wind, and precipitation. Analyzing these interactions is essential for understanding climate complexity. This study examines the dynamic relationships between meteorological variables in Niğde, Turkey, using data from 1950 to 2020, and compares the forecasting performance of various time series models. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model, while multivariate analysis involved the Vector Autoregressive (VAR), Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), and Bayesian Vector Autoregressive (BVAR) models. Granger Causality Test, Johansen Cointegration Test, and Impulse-Response Function were applied to assess interactions among climate variables. The analysis showed that climate variables significantly influence one another, highlighting the importance of these interactions for accurate forecasting. Among the models, SARIMA demonstrated superior performance in univariate forecasting, consistently yielding lower root mean square error (RMSE) values compared to VAR, VECM, and BVAR models. These results offer a strong basis for predicting future trends in climate variables specific to the Niğde region. Additionally, the findings contribute to the formulation of regional development strategies and support climate impact management in sectors such as agriculture and water resources.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The authors declare that all ethical guidelines including authorship, citation, data reporting, and publishing original research are followed.

References

  1. A. Ambya, E. Russel, S. Paujiah, D. N. Pratama, W. Wamiliana, and M. Usman, "Analysis of data inflation energy and gasoline price by vector autoregressive model," Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 120–126, 2022.
  2. L. T. Abdullah, "Forecasting time series using vector autoregressive model," Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 499–511, 2022.
  3. H. A. T. Nguyen, H. D. Nguyen, and T. H. Do, "An application of vector autoregressive model for analyzing the impact of weather and nearby traffic flow on the traffic volume," in Proc. 2022 RIVF Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Technol. (RIVF), Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, pp. 328–333, IEEE, 2022.
  4. S. R. Sakib, K. N. Sara, M. T. H. Rasel, M. M. I. Asif, M. A. H. Nahid, M. S. Rahman, and A. Islam, "Time series analysis and forecasting of air quality index of Dhaka City of Bangladesh," in Proc. 2023 IEEE World AI IoT Congr. (AIIoT), Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 0063–0069, IEEE, 2023.
  5. A. F. Ningrum, A. Suharsono, and S. P. Rahayu, "Comparison of vector autoregressive and long short term memory for forecasting air pollution index in Jakarta," in Proc. 2022 6th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol., Inf. Syst. Electr. Eng. (ICITISEE), pp. 547–552, IEEE, 2022.
  6. T. M. Mawora, “ARIMA and vector autoregressive model evaluation in forecasting rainfall: A case of Kisumu”, Doctoral dissertation, Maseno Univ., Kisumu, Kenya, 2022.
  7. Y. O. Ouma, D. Moalahi, G. Anderson, B. Nkwae, P. Odirile, B. P. Parida, and J. Qi, "Predicting the variability of dam water levels with land-use and climatic factors using Random Forest and Vector AutoRegression models," in Remote Sens. Agric., Ecosyst., Hydrol. XXIV, vol. 12262, pp. 54–66, SPIE, 2022.
  8. S. Hartini, M. P. Hadi, S. Sudibyakto, and A. Poniman, "Application of vector auto regression model for rainfall-river discharge analysis," Forum Geografi, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 118-127, Aug. 2015.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Global Environmental Engineering, Geospatial Information Systems and Geospatial Data Modelling, Geomatic Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 1, 2025

Submission Date

May 2, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 18, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 13 Number: 4

APA
Gümüş, M. G., Çiftçi, H. Ç., & Gümüş, K. (2025). COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 13(4), 1042-1062. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1689527
AMA
1.Gümüş MG, Çiftçi HÇ, Gümüş K. COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE. KONJES. 2025;13(4):1042-1062. doi:10.36306/konjes.1689527
Chicago
Gümüş, Münevver Gizem, Hasan Çağatay Çiftçi, and Kutalmış Gümüş. 2025. “COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 13 (4): 1042-62. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1689527.
EndNote
Gümüş MG, Çiftçi HÇ, Gümüş K (December 1, 2025) COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 13 4 1042–1062.
IEEE
[1]M. G. Gümüş, H. Ç. Çiftçi, and K. Gümüş, “COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE”, KONJES, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1042–1062, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.36306/konjes.1689527.
ISNAD
Gümüş, Münevver Gizem - Çiftçi, Hasan Çağatay - Gümüş, Kutalmış. “COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 13/4 (December 1, 2025): 1042-1062. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1689527.
JAMA
1.Gümüş MG, Çiftçi HÇ, Gümüş K. COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE. KONJES. 2025;13:1042–1062.
MLA
Gümüş, Münevver Gizem, et al. “COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 1042-6, doi:10.36306/konjes.1689527.
Vancouver
1.Münevver Gizem Gümüş, Hasan Çağatay Çiftçi, Kutalmış Gümüş. COMPARISON OF FORECAST PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT METHODS BY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLIMATE VARIABLES: NIĞDE PROVINCE EXAMPLE. KONJES. 2025 Dec. 1;13(4):1042-6. doi:10.36306/konjes.1689527