IMPROVING ICESAT GLAS DERIVED WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS OVER LAKE VAN, TÜRKİYE

Abstract

Understanding the impacts of climate change on water resources is crucial for sustainable freshwater management, particularly given that only 0.3% of Earth’s water is accessible surface freshwater. The global decline in operational in situ gauging stations has further highlighted the need for reliable satellite-based alternatives. Although radar and laser altimeters offer valuable data, they require thorough validation to ensure hydrological accuracy. This study assesses the quality of water surface elevation (WSE) derived from the first laser altimetry mission, ICESat, data over Lake Van (Türkiye), the world’s largest soda lake, during its operational period (2003–2009). Initial comparisons revealed root mean square errors (RMSE) ranging from 1.09 to 2.49 m, depending on the satellite track, exceeding values reported in earlier studies. After applying residual corrections, RMSE values were reduced to 0.00–1.25 m, with correlation coefficients increasing to 0.45–0.97. These results confirm the potential of satellite altimetry for monitoring inland water bodies. However, the study also highlights challenges likely to affect follow-on missions such as ICESat-2 and SWOT. The study underscores the importance of developing higher-resolution and more accurate geoid models to improve WSE retrievals, especially for missions requiring stringent precision thresholds.

Keywords

• EGM2008
• GLAS
• ICESat
• ICESat2
• Laser Altimetry
• SWOT

References

1. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. M. B. Tignor, H.L. Miller and Z. Chen, AR4 Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
2. C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, Q. Dahe, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, P.M. Midgley, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
3. R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer, Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 151 IPCC, 2014.
4. E. Şener, A. Davraz and S. Şener, “Investigation of Akşehir and Eber Lakes (SW Turkey) coastline change with multitemporal satellite images,” Water Resour. Manage., 24, 727- 745, 2010. DOI 10.1007/s11269-009-9467-5
5. Ü. Yıldırım, S. Erdoğan and M. Uysal, “Changes in the coastline and water level of the Akşehir and Eber Lakes between 1975 and 2009,” Water Resour. Manage., 24, 941-962, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-010-9735-4
6. A. E. Tekeli, “Augmenting in situ lake level measurements with Earth observation satellites,” Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 29, 6, 8675-8689, 2018. DOI: 10.18400/tekderg.341316
7. G. Gelberi, “Son Yıllardaki Van Gölü Seviye Değişimlerinin Analizi”, M.S Thesis, Bitliz Eren ve Dicle Üniversitesi. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bitlis, 2021.
8. F. A. Aydın, “Van Lake level changes and the effects of these changes on the coasts,” M.S Thesis, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi. Institute of Social Sciences, Van, 2017.

9. F. A. Aydın and A. F. Doğu, “Göllerde seviye değişimleri ve nedenleri: Van Gölü örneği,” Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 41, 183-208, 2018. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yyusbed/issue/43563/533057
10. N. Xu, H. Lu, W. Li and P. Gong, “Natural lakes dominate global water storage variability,” Sci Bull (Beijing), 69, 8, 1016-1019, Apr. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.02.023
11. N. Xu, Y. Ma, W. Zhang and X. H. Wan, “Surface water level changes during 2003-2019 in Australia revealed by ICESat/ICESat-2 Altimetry and Landsat imagery,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol 18, No 7, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.2996769
12. N. Xu, H. Zheng, Y. Ma, J. Yang, X. Liu and X. Wang, “Global estimation and assessment of monthly lake/reservoir water level changes using ICESat-2 ATL13 products,” Remote Sensing, 13, 2021. DOI:10.3390/rs13142744
13. Y. Ma, N. Xu, W Zhang, X. H. Wang, J. Sun, X, Feng and Y. Sun, “Increasing water levels of global lakes between 2003 and 2009,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol 17, No 2, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2920387
14. L. Ke, X. Dinga and C. Song, “Heterogeneous changes of glaciers over the western Kunlun Mountains based on ICESat and Landsat-8 derived glacier inventory,” Remote Sensing of Environment, 168, 13-23, 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.019.
15. Y. Wang, G Li, J. Ding, Z. Guo, S. Tang, C. Wang, Q. R. Liu and J. M. Chen, “A combined GLAS and MODIS estimation of the global distribution of mean forest canopy height,” Remote Sens. Environ, 174, 24-43, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.005
16. G. Zhang, H. Xie, S. Kang, D. Yi, and S. F. Ackley, “Monitoring Lake level changes on the Tibetan Plateau using ICESat altimetry data (2003-2009),” Remote Sens. Environ, 115, 7, 1733–1742, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.005
17. G. Zhang, H. Xie, S. Duan, M. Tian, and D. Yi, “Water level variation of Lake Qinghai from satellite and in situ measurements under climate change,” J of Applied Remote Sensing, 5, 1, 3532, 2011. DOI:10.1117/1.3601363
18. F. Saka, A. E. Tekeli and S. Dönmez, “Effect of Geoid Variations on ICESat Altimeter Based Water Surface Elevations,” Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 32, 3, 10807-10822, 2021. DOI: 10.18400/tekderg.634227
19. NASA, https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/92591/lake-van-turkey. [Accessed 22 April 2025]
20. K. E. Saraçoğlu and F. A. Saraçoğlu, “Trend Analysis of Lake Surface Temperatures in Lake Van,” Doğ Afet Çev Derg., 8, 2, 221–37, 2022. DOI:10.21324/dacd.1003496
21. S. Coşkun, “Van Gölü Kapali Havzasinda Yağişlarin Trend Analizi,” Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 8, 2, 521-32, 2020. DOI:10.21923/jesd.685420
22. A. Reimer, G. Landmann and S. Kempe, “Lake Van, Eastern Anatolia, Hydrochemistry and History,” Aquatic Geochemistry, 15, 1–2, 195-222, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s10498-008-9049-9
23. Z. M. Yaseen, S. Naghshara, S. Q. Salih, S. Kim, A. Malik and M. A. Ghorbani, “Lake Water Level Modeling Using Newly Developed Hybrid Data Intelligence Model,” Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 141, 3–4, 1285-1300, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-020-03263-8
24. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, “Van Gölü Havzası Kuralık Yönetim Planı, Cilt-I: Havzanın Genel Tanıtımı ve Kuraklık Analizleri”, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/KURAKLIK%20Y%C3%96NET%C4%B0M%20PLANLARI%2009.01.2023/Van%20G%C3%B6l%C3%BC%20Havzas%C4%B1%20Kurakl%C4%B1k%20Y%C3%B6netim%20Plan%C4%B1%20Cilt%201.pdf . [Accessed 17 February 2026]
25. Y. Çiftçi, M. A. Işık, T. Alkevli and Ç. Yeşilova, “Environmental Geology of Lake Van Basin,” Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi, 32, 2, 45–77, 2008.
26. A. Altunkaynak, “Predicting Water Level Fluctuations in Lake Van Using Hybrid Season-Neuro Approach,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24, 8, 2019. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001804
27. A. Altunkaynak and Z. Şen, “Fuzzy logic model of lake water level fluctuations in Lake Van, Turkey,” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 90, 227-233, 2007. DOI:10.1007/s00704-006-0267-z
28. ICESat, https://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat/index.php. [Accessed 22 April 2025].
29. H. J. Zwally, B. Schutz, W. Abdalati, J. Abshire, C. Bentley, A. Brenner, et al. “ICESat's laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land,” Journal of Geodynamics, 34, 3–4, 405−445, 2002. DOI:10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00042-X
30. NSIDC, https://nsidc.org/data/gla14/versions/34#anchor-documentation. [Accessed 22 April 2025].
31. F. E. O’Loughlin, J. Neal, D. Yamazaki, and P. D. Bates, “ICESat-derived inland water surface spot heights,” Water Resources Research, 52, 4, 3276-3284, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018237
32. D. K. Hall, G. A. Riggs, V. V. Salomonson, “Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data”, Remote Sens Environ, 54:127–14, 1995. DOI:10.1016/0034-4257(95)00137-P
33. NASA, https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod10.php [Accessed 13 August 2025]
34. NSIDC, https://nsidc.org/sites/default/files/mod10a1-v061-userguide_1.pdf [Accessed 13 August 2025]
35. A. E. Tekeli, A. Sensoy, A. A. Sorman, Z. Akyurek and A. U. Sorman, “Accuracy assessment of MODIS daily snow albedo retrievals within situ measurements in Karasu Basin, Turkey,” Hydrological Processes, 20, 705-721, 2006. DOI:10.1002/hyp.6114
36. B. S. Rao, G. A. N. Kumar, P. V. S. S. N. Krishna, P. Srinivasulu and V. R. Venkataraman, “Evaluation of EGM 2008 with EGM96 and its utilization in Topographical Mapping Projects,” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 40, 2, 335-340, 2012. DOI:10.1007/s12524-011-0131-1
37. A. Kılıçoğlu, A. Direnç, M. Simav, O. Lenk, B. Aktug and H. Yildiz, “Evaluation of The Earth Gravitational Model 2008 in Turkey,” International Service for the Geoid, Report_EA7_Turkey, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.isgeoid.polimi.it/Newton/Newton_4/Report_EA7_Turkey.pdf [Accessed 17 February 2026]
38. N. Yilmaz and C. Karaali, “Comparison of global and local gravetric models in Turkey,” Scientific and Research Essays, 5, 14, 1829-1839, 2010.
39. L. Jiang, O. B. Andersen, K. Nielsen, G. Zhang and P. Bauer-Gottwein, “Influence of local geoid variation on water surface elevation estimates derived from multi-mission altimetry for Lake Namco,” Remote Sens. Environ, 221, 65-79, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.004. Y. Kaya, “Comparative validation of the radar interferometry-based SYM12 Using ICESat-2 ATL03 and ground-based GPS measurements”, Turkish Journal of Remote Sensing, 7(1) ,53-68, 2025
40. M. G. Koçak, “Sentinel-2 görüntüleri ve ICESat-2 ATL03 foton yükseklik verilerinin kombinasyonu ile batimetri haritası üretilebilirliğinin araştırılması”, Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation, 9(1) ,47-58, 2022
41. Wikipedia, https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Gölü. [Accessed 22 April 2025]
42. Wikipedia, https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdur_Gölü. [Accessed 22 April 2025]