OPTIMIZATION OF TOOL PATH STRATEGIES IN POCKET MILLING OF AA7075-T6 ALLOY BY STATISTICAL AND MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACHES

Abstract

This study investigated the optimal tool path strategy by analysing surface roughness and cutting force using statistical and multi-criteria approaches. Pocket milling of AA7075-T6 was carried out under different tool path levels, feed rates, and spindle speeds within a computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) setup, and their effects on cutting force and surface roughness were evaluated. The optimal parameter combination for minimising both outputs was identified through Taguchi S/N analysis and multi-criteria decision-making techniques (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)). Furthermore, the contribution ratios of machining parameters were determined using ANOVA, and 3D topography images visually supported the results. Findings indicated that toolpath was the most influential factor on both responses. According to ANOVA, the tool path accounted for 91.05% and 76.32% of the variation in cutting force under roughing and finishing conditions, respectively, and 91.75% of the variation in surface roughness. The statistical results were consistent with the 3D topography observations. One-way tool path, 1200 mm/min feed rate, and 4800 rpm cutting speed were determined as the optimal parameters for minimum cutting forces (Fx: 55.11 N, Fy: 81.76 N, and Fz: 74.83 N). Minimum surface roughness (0.299 μm) was obtained with the parameters V-zigzag tool path, 220 mm/min feed rate and 4800 rpm cutting speed. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that tool path is a critical parameter in multi-response optimisation and by simultaneously addressing both rough and finish milling conditions, which have not been comprehensively analysed together in earlier works.

Keywords

• ANOVA
• CAD/CAM
• GRA
• Taguchi
• TOPSIS.

References

1. L. Kariuki, B. Ikua, and G. Nyakoe, “Generation and Optimization of Pocket Milling Tool Paths - A Review,” in International Conference on Sustainable Research and Innovation, 2014, vol. 5, no. May, pp. 129–133.
2. L. N. López de Lacalle, A. Lamikiz, J. A. Sánchez, and M. A. Salgado, “Toolpath selection based on the minimum deflection cutting forces in the programming of complex surfaces milling,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 47, pp. 388–400, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.010.
3. K. Shi, D. Zhang, J. Ren, C. Yao, and X. Huang, “Effect of cutting parameters on machinability characteristics in milling of magnesium alloy with carbide tool,”Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1687814016628392.
4. E. Sirin, S. Sirin, Y. Turgut, and I. Korkut, “Optimization of Surface Roughness Using the Taguchi Method in Milling of AISI D2 Cold Work Tool Steel,” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknol. Derg., vol. 3, pp. 132–144, 2015.
5. O. Erkan and E. Yucel, “Optimization of the surface roughness of the endmilled AA 7075 material with respect to cutting parameters and tool geometry,” in International Eurasian Conference on Science, Engineering and Technology (EurasianSciEnTech 2018), 2018, no. November, pp. 796–803.
6. J. Ribeiro, H. Lopes, L. Queijo, and D. Figueiredo, “Optimization of cutting parameters to minimize the surface roughness in the end milling process using the Taguchi method,” Period. Polytech. Mech. Eng., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2017, doi: 10.3311/PPme.9114.
7. J. U. Pillai, I. Sanghrajka, M. Shunmugavel, T. Muthuramalingam, M. Goldberg, and G. Littlefair, “Optimisation of multiple response characteristics on end milling of aluminium alloy using Taguchi-Grey relational approach,” Measurement, vol. 124, pp. 291–298, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.052.
8. K. Xu, M. Luo, and K. Tang, “Machine based energy-saving tool path generation for five-axis end milling of freeform surfaces,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 139, pp. 1207–1223, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.140.

9. A. Gok, C. Gologlu, and H. I. Demirci, “Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 69, pp. 1063–1078, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5075-x.
10. T. Peng and X. Xu, “Energy-efficient machining systems: A critical review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 72, pp. 1389–1406, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-5756-0.
11. K. Castelino, R. D’Souza, and P. K. Wright, “Tool-path optimization for minimizing airtime during machining,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 173–180, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0278-6125(03)90018-5.
12. I. Lazoglu, C. Manav, and Y. Murtezaoglu, “Tool path optimization for free form surface machining,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., vol. 58, pp. 101–104, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.054.
13. Y. F. Yapan, K. Türkeli, U. Emiroğlu, E. Bahçe, and A. Uysal, “Machining and Sustainability Performance Comparison for the Milling Process of Al6082 Alloy Under Various Minimum Quantity Lubrication Conditions,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 409–430, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40684-024-00655-3.
14. M. O. Esangbedo and J. K. Abifarin, “Cost and Quality Optimization Taguchi Design with Grey Relational Analysis of Halloysite Nanotube Hybrid Composite: CNC Machine Manufacturing,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 22, p. 8154, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15228154.
15. M. Tahiduzzaman, A. K. Ghosh, and S. Ura, “Manufacturing Process Optimization Using Open Data and Different Analysis Methods,” J. Manuf. Mater. Process., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 106, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/jmmp9040106.
16. Y. Çodur, B. Özlü, and H. Demir, “Analysis and Optimization of Process Parameters Affecting Form Errors and Surface Roughness in Milling of Aging-Treated AA 6063-T6 Free Form Surfaces,” İmalat Teknol. ve Uygulamaları, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 155–171, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.52795/mateca.1535125.
17. B. Özlü, U. Çelik, and H. Demir, “Serbest Formlu İnce Cidarlı AA 5083-H111 Alaşımının Frezelenmesinde Kesme Parametrelerinin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkilerini Deneysel ve İstatiksel Değerlendirilmesi,” Afyon Kocatepe Univ. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 512–522, May 2023, doi: 10.35414/akufemubid.1145100.
18. H. D. Uğurcan Çelik, Barış Özlü, “Serbest Formlu İnce Cidarli AA 5083-H111 Alaşiminin Frezelenmesinde Kesme Parametrelerinin Form Hatasina Etkisini Üç Boyutlu Koordinat Ölçme ve Lazer Tarama ile Karşilaştirilmasi,” Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilim. Derg., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 633–642, 2022.
19. G. Kant and K. S. Sangwan, “Prediction and optimization of machining parameters for minimizing power consumption and surface roughness in machining,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 83, pp. 151–164, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.073.
20. A. Zaino and M. Yazid, “Environmentally friendly approaches assisted machining of aluminum alloy 7075-T6 for automotive applications: A review,” Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 18–26, 2019, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2019.11.06.003.
21. S. C. Cagan, B. Venkatesh, and B. B. Buldum, “Investigation of surface roughness and chip morphology of aluminum alloy in dry and minimum quantity lubrication machining,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 27, pp. 1122–1126, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.547.
22. Z. Q. Liu, X. J. Cai, M. Chen, and Q. L. An, “Investigation of cutting force and temperature of end-milling Ti-6Al-4V with different minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) parameters,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 225, no. 8, pp. 1273–1279, 2011, doi: 10.1177/2041297510393793.
23. M. Gunay, A. Kacal, and Y. Turgut, “Optimization of Machining Parameters in Milling of Tİ-6Al-4V Taguchi Method,” E-Journal New World Sci. Acad., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 428–440, 2011.
24. Y. Li, G. Zheng, X. Zhang, X. Cheng, X. Yang, and R. Xu, “Cutting force, tool wear and surface roughness in high-speed milling of high-strength steel with coated tools,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 5393–5398, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12206-019-1033-3.
25. N. M. B. M. Mydin, A. N. B. Dahnel, N. A. Raof, N. K. MK, and S. Mokhtar, “The Effect of Cutting Parameters on Tool Wear in Drilling Aluminium 7075,” Test Eng. Manag., vol. 83, pp. 1274–1280, 2020.
26. A. Kumar, N. Kumar, S. Kumar, and R. Garg, “Comparing parametric optimization of the machining parameters of AL2024-SIC for MRR using Taguchi and applied statistical plots,” Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 323–336, 2017, doi: 10.24247/ijmperdoct201733.
27. C. C. Tran, V. T. Luu, V. T. Nguyen, V. T. Tran, V. T. Tran, and H. D. Vu, “Multi-objective Optimization of CNC Milling Parameters of 7075 Aluminium Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology,” Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 393–402, 2023, doi: 10.59038/jjmie/170308.
28. R. N. Nimase and P. M. Khodke, “Effect of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness of Al-7075 Alloy in End Milling,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1505–1508, 2015.
29. R. Venkatesh, V. Vijayan, A. Parthiban, T. Sathish, and S. Siva Chandran, “Comparison of different tool path in pocket milling,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 922–927, 2018.
30. Krishankant, J. Taneja, M. Bector, and R. Kumar, “Application of Taguchi Method for Optimizing Turning Process by the Effects of Machining Parameters,” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 263–274, 2012.
31. A. R. Motorcu, “The optimization of machining parameters using the taguchi method for surface roughness of an AISI 8660 hardened alloy steel,” Stroj. Vestnik/Journal Mech. Eng., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 391–401, 2010.
32. M. Hadad, “An experimental investigation of the effects of machining parameters on environmentally friendly grinding process,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 108, pp. 217–231, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.092.
33. S. K. Tamang, M. Chandrasekaran, and A. K. Sahoo, “Sustainable machining: an experimental investigation and optimization of machining Inconel 825 with dry and MQL approach,” J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 40, pp. 1–18, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40430-018-1294-2.
34. A. R. C. Sharman, J. I. Hughes, and K. Ridgway, “An analysis of the residual stresses generated in Inconel 718TM when turning,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 359–367, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.12.007.
35. Z. T. Tang, Z. Q. Liu, Y. Z. Pan, Y. Wan, and X. Ai, “The influence of tool flank wear on residual stresses induced by milling aluminum alloy,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 209, no. 9, pp. 4502–4508, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.034.
36. S. Agrawal and S. S. Joshi, “Analytical modelling of residual stresses in orthogonal machining of AISI 4340 steel,” J. Manuf. Process., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 167–179, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.11.004.
37. S. Karabulut, “Optimization of surface roughness and cutting force during AA7039/Al2O3 metal matrix composites milling using neural networks and Taguchi method,” Measurement, vol. 66, pp. 139–149, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.01.027.
38. I. Korkut and M. A. Donertas, “The influence of feed rate and cutting speed on the cutting forces, surface roughness and tool-chip contact length during face milling,” Mater. Des., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 308–312, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.002.
39. N. Altan Ozbek, A. Cicek, M. Gulesin, and O. Ozbek, “Evaluation of Machinability of AISI 304 and AISI 316 Austenitic Stainless Steels,” J. Polytech., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2017, doi: 10.31202/ecjse.67151.
40. E. Malyer, “Examining the Residual Stress on the Burnished AA7075-T6 Aluminum Alloy,” J. Polytech., vol. 0900, no. 3, pp. 565–573, 2018, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.389592.
41. D. C. Montgomery, Elizabeth A. Peck, and G. Geoffrey Vining, Introductıon to Lınear Regressıon Analysıs, 5th ed. United States of America: A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication.
42. H. Domac, “An investigation into the effects of tool nose radius and cutting edge geometry on surface roughness and cutting forces in milling operation,” Gazi University, 2011.
43. M. Y. Tsai, S. Y. Chang, J. P. Hung, and C. C. Wang, “Investigation of milling cutting forces and cutting coefficient for aluminum 6060-T6,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 51, pp. 320–330, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.09.016.
44. T. Yildiz and H. Dilipak, “Investigation of the effects of cutting parameters on the cutting force and surface roughness in milling of stainles steels,” in 3rd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies, 2019, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 190–195.
45. M. H. Cetin, B. Ozcelik, E. Kuram, and E. Demirbas, “Evaluation of vegetable based cutting fluids with extreme pressure and cutting parameters in turning of AISI 304L by Taguchi method,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 19, no. 17–18, pp. 2049–2056, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.013.
46. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley. New York, USA, 2004.
47. D. D. Boos and L. A. Stefanski, “P-value precision and reproducibility,” Am. Stat., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 213–221, 2011, doi: 10.1198/tas.2011.10129.
48. E. Sirin, Y. Turgut, and I. Korkut, “The Influence of Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness and Tool Wear In Milling of AISI D2 Cold Work Tool Steels of Different Hardness,” J. Polytech., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2012.
49. N. Tosun and M. Huseyinoglu, “Effect of MQL on surface roughness in milling of AA7075-T6,” Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 793–798, 2010, doi: 10.1080/10426910903496821.
50. T. Ding, S. Zhang, Y. Wang, and X. Zhu, “Empirical models and optimal cutting parameters for cutting forces and surface roughness in hard milling of AISI H13 steel,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 51, no. 1–4, pp. 45–55, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2598-2.
51. E. S. Gadelmawla, M. M. Koura, T. M. A. Maksoud, I. M. Elewa, and H. H. Soliman, “Roughness parameters,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 123, pp. 133–145, 2002, doi: 10.1201/b12265.
52. A. P. Hekimoglu, S. Bayraktar, and Y. Turgut, “Investigation of the Effect of Cutting Speed and Feed Rate on Machining of the Al-35Zn Alloy,” in 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies, 2018, pp. 77–83.
53. B. S. Bayram, M. O. Kabakçı, and İ. Korkut, “Investigation of the Milling Methods Effects on Machining Performance of AA 7075-T6 Aluminum Alloy and Process Parameters Optimization,” Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 91–104, 2025, doi: 10.59038/jjmie/190107.
54. F. Kara, N. Altan Özbek, and O. Özbek, “Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on the Machinability of Impax Supreme Steel and Optimization of Machining Parameters,” ES Mater. Manuf., vol. 27, pp. 1–13, 2025, doi: 10.30919/mm1457.
55. F. J. G. Silvaet al., “A Comparative Study of Different Milling Strategies on Productivity, Tool Wear, Surface Roughness, and Vibration,” J. Manuf. Mater. Process., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 115, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmmp8030115.
56. H. Y. Feng and N. Su, “Integrated tool path and feed rate optimization for the finishing machining of 3D plane surfaces,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1557–1572, Sep. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00025-0.
57. R. H. L. da Silva and A. Hassui, “Cutting force and surface roughness depend on the tool path used in side milling: an experimental investigation,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 96, pp. 1445–1455, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-1680-z.
58. M. Jebaraj, M. Pradeep Kumar, N. Yuvaraj, and G. Mujibar Rahman, “Experimental study of the influence of the process parameters in the milling of Al6082-T6 alloy,” Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1411–1427, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1594271.
59. H. S. Lu, C. K. Chang, N. C. Hwang, and C. T. Chung, “Grey relational analysis coupled with principal component analysis for optimization design of the cutting parameters in high-speed end milling,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 209, pp. 3808–3817, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.030.
60. H. Yaka, H. Demir, and A. Gök, “Optimization of the cutting parameters affecting the surface roughness on free form surfaces,” Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 323–331, 2017.
61. H. Yaka, H. Demir, A. Gök, and H. Akkuş, “Determination of optimum cutting parameters on free form surfaces in terms of form errors and machining times,” Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1153–1164, 2018.
62. F. Kara, A. Takmaz, Ö. Erkan, and S. Filiz, “Response Surface Method Optimization of Hard Machining with Cryogenically Treated Cutting Tools: Surface Roughness, Cutting Force, Tool Wear, Rietveld Analysis, and Metallurgical Properties,” Steel Res. Int., vol. 96, no. 7, p. 2400850, 2025, doi: 10.1002/srin.202400850.