Research Article

A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS

Volume: 8 Number: 3 September 3, 2020
EN TR

A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS

Abstract

In this article, a structural analysis was conducted on a total of 40 building models with
varying building height and wall dimensions in order to determine the optimum ratio of shear wall area
to floor area in a reinforced concrete building. For this purpose, 20, 30 and 40 story buildings were
selected to investigate the effect of varying building heights on their structural behaviors. A parametric
study on shear wall areas was conducted base on varying shear wall area to floor area ratios. Building
models, therefore, included no wall and walls with 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2.0% area ratios applied in
combined x and y directions. Each of these models was subjected to response spectrum analysis using
the forces generated according to the 2018 dated Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC 18) and 2016 dated
American Building Code (ASCE 7-16). The buildings were assumed to be all office buildings located in a
severe seismic zone region, Avcilar, Istanbul. The 30 and 40 story buildings due to their total heights had
to be considered tall in line with the requirements in TEC 18. The additional requirements were also
included in the analysis to understand the impact of tall buildings on the optimum shear wall
determination. Therefore, the following parameters were investigated for the optimum shear wall area
to floor area ratio: (a) building periods, (b) base shear and shear forces resisted by all shear walls, and (c)
maximum lateral displacements and story drifts. The impact of effective wall layout configuration on
structural behavior was also investigated by studying the 2.0% wall area ratio. The results indicated that
the most effective ratios of shear wall area to floor area for the 20 and 30 story buildings were equal to
1.5% and 2.0%, respectively. However, the need for the wall area of the 40 story building was slightly
more than 2.0%. However, as the wall layout was revised for the building with the 2.0% wall area ratio,
the requirement for the wall area was nearly met indicating that the 2.0% wall area ratio could also be
recommended for the 40 story building.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Ageedi, M., 2019, Determination of the Optimum Shear Wall Area to Floor Area Ratio for Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Master’s Thesis in Civil Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara.
  2. ASCE 7-16: Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, 2016, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia.
  3. Burak, B., Comlekoglu, H.G., 2013, “Effect of Shear Wall Area to Floor Area Ratio on the Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 139, No. 11, pp. 1928-1937.
  4. Esmaili, O., Epackachi, S., Samadzad M., Mirghaderi, S.R., 2008, “Study of Structural RC Shear Wall System in A 56-Story RC Tall Building”, The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 12-27, 2008.
  5. ETABS Version 17.0.1, 2018, Computers and Structures Inc. Fintel, M. 1995, “Performance of Buildings with Shear Walls in Earthquakes of the Last Thirty Years”, PCI Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 62-80.
  6. Foroughi, S., Yüksel, S. B., 2016, “Effect of Shear Walls on the Seismic Behavior of the Cast-in-Site Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” The 2nd International Conference on Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Architectural & Urban Development, March 14, 2016, Istanbul, Turkey.
  7. Gunel, A., 2013, Influence of the Shear Wall Area to Floor Area Ratio on the Seismic Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Master’s Thesis in Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  8. Gupta, S., Akhtar S., Hussain, A., 2016, “Effect of Shear Wall Location on Bending Moment and Shear Force of Multistory Building Subjected to Earthquake Loading,” International Journal of Computer and Advanced Engineering Research, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 4-21.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

September 3, 2020

Submission Date

December 30, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 30, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Tunç, G., & Al-ageedi, M. (2020). A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.666748
AMA
1.Tunç G, Al-ageedi M. A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS. KONJES. 2020;8(3):601-617. doi:10.36306/konjes.666748
Chicago
Tunç, Gökhan, and Mustafa Al-ageedi. 2020. “A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 8 (3): 601-17. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.666748.
EndNote
Tunç G, Al-ageedi M (September 1, 2020) A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 8 3 601–617.
IEEE
[1]G. Tunç and M. Al-ageedi, “A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS”, KONJES, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 601–617, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.36306/konjes.666748.
ISNAD
Tunç, Gökhan - Al-ageedi, Mustafa. “A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 8/3 (September 1, 2020): 601-617. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.666748.
JAMA
1.Tunç G, Al-ageedi M. A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS. KONJES. 2020;8:601–617.
MLA
Tunç, Gökhan, and Mustafa Al-ageedi. “A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS”. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2020, pp. 601-17, doi:10.36306/konjes.666748.
Vancouver
1.Gökhan Tunç, Mustafa Al-ageedi. A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM SHEAR WALL AREA FOR MID-TO HIGH-RISE RC BUILDINGS. KONJES. 2020 Sep. 1;8(3):601-17. doi:10.36306/konjes.666748

Cited By