BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 377 - 398, 01.04.2012

Gülay Dalgıç Şirin Karadeniz Elif Canan Onat

Öz

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin üniversite kavramını tanımlamak için kullandıkları mecaz ifadeleri saptamak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Veri toplamak amacıyla katılımcılardan “Üniversite ... gibidir çünkü ...” cümlesini tamamlamaları istenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde hem nitel hem de nicel yöntemler kullanılmıştır.Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, 837 katılımcı 13 kavramsal tema altında üniversite kavramına ilişkin toplam 335 adet geçerli metafor üretmiştir. Belirlenen kavramsal kategoriler ile cinsiyet, fakülte ve yaş değişkenleri arasından anlamlı ilişki saptanmamıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarının yükseköğretim yöneticilerine, politika yapıcılara ve akademisyenlere üniversite kavramının öğrenciler tarafından nasıl algılandığını saptamada önemli veri sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  • Baker, P. S. (1991). Metaphors of mindful engagement and a vision of better schools. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 32-35.
  • Bakioğlu, A., & Dalgıç, G. (2008). The effects of globalization on university policies. Education and Development Conference, Proceedings Abstract (5p), 07-09 March 2008, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Balcı, A. (2001). Öğrenci, öğretmen ve velilerin okul kavramlaştırmaları: Okulun metaforik bir analizi. X. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Sempozyumu III. Cilt. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Yayınları, 130-135.
  • Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 277-290.
  • Bredeson, P. V. (1985). The analysis of the metaphorical perspectives of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(1), 29-50.
  • Brock-Utne, B. (2002). The global forces affecting the education sector today - The universities in Europe as an example. Higher Education in Europe,27, 283-99.
  • Cerit, Y. (2006). School metaphors: The views of students, teachers and administrators. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 6(3), 692-699.
  • Cerit, Y. (2008). Öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin müdür kavramı ile ilgili metaforlara ilişkin görüşleri. Education & Sciences, 33(147), 3-13.
  • Chang, S. M. (1999). Impact of university education on students: An empirical study of Taiwanese university students’ experiences and learning. Taipei, Taiwan: Teacher Chang.
  • Chen, D. D. (2003). A classification system for metaphors about teaching. Journal Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72, 49-53.
  • Chiu, L. K. (1994). Values of university students in Taichung area. Journal of General Education, 3, 94-147.
  • Delaney, S. J. (1969). Student and the concept of a university. Studium, 2, 109-112.
  • Duderstadt, J. J. (1997). The future of the university in an era of change. Retrieved August, 23, 2011, from University of Michigan, The Millennium Project Web site: http://milproj.ummu.umich.edu/publications/change/download/change.pdf.
  • Evans, G. R. (2002). Academics and the real world. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Hacıfazlıoğlu, O., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Dalgıç, G. (2011). Okul yöneticilerinin teknoloji liderliğine ilişkin algıları: Metafor analizi örneği. EBAD, 1, 97-117.
  • Hamlyn, D.W. (1996). The concept of philosophy. Philosophy, 71(276), 205-218.
  • Inbar, D.E. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38(1), 77-92.
  • Iyi, S. (2002). Üniversitenin bütünleşmesinde etik’in önemi [Importance of ethics in the integration of university]. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Kültür Sanat Kurulu, 3-10.
  • Jarvis, P. (2006). The Bologna Process: Europeanization or globalization? Prospero, 12, 6-13.
  • Kaufman, J.,& Gabler, J. (2004). Cultural capital and the extracurricular activities of girls and boys in the college attainment process. Poetics, 32(2), 145-168.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago.
  • Lin, Y. (2010). Taiwanese university students’ perceptions of university life. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 189-202.
  • Mahlios, M., & Maxson, M. (1998). Metaphors as structures for elementary and secondary preservice teachers’ thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 227-240.
  • Miles, M. B.,& Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mohabedbhai, G. (2008). Globalization and its implications on universities and developing countries. Paper presented at One World Week, Forum on Global Universities Warwick University, 27 January, Coventry, UK.
  • Nakpodia, E. D. (2009). The concept of the university as learning organization: Its functions, techniques and possible ways of making it effective. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 1(5), 79-83.
  • Olufemi, S. O. (2007). Globalization, migration and brain drain: The experience of Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria. 14th Nordic Migration Researchers’ Conference, 14-16 November, Bergen, Norway.
  • Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar (Metaphors about school). Educational Administration: Theory and Practice,55, 459-496.
  • Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 281-326.
  • Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 290-305.
  • Saban, A., Kocbeker B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123–139.
  • Scott, P. (2003). Challenges to academic values and the organization of academic work in a time of globalization. Higher Education in Europe, 28, 295-303.
  • Silman, F. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Türkiye ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri okulları ve merkezi eğitim kurumlarına mecazlar yoluyla bir bakış. Araştırmaları(Eurasian Journal of Educational Research), 6(23), 177-187 Eğitim
  • Singh, K. (2010). Metaphor as a tool in educational leadership classrooms. Management in Education, 24(3), 127-131.
  • Şimşek, H. (1997). Metaphorical images of an organization: The power of symbolic constructs in reading change in higher education organizations. Higher Education, 33, 283-307.
  • Thomas, L.,& Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 762-769.
  • Verri, G. (2003). Challenges to academe in a time of globalization. Higher Education in Europe, 28(3), 307-310.
  • Weade, R., & Ernst, G. (1990). Pictures of life in classrooms, and the search for metaphors to frame them. Theory into Practice, 29(2), 133-140.
  • White, A. (1985). Meaning and effects of listening to popular music: Implications for counseling.
  • Journal of Counseling & Development 64(1), 65-9.
  • Yoder, B. L. (2006). Globalization of higher education in eight Chinese universities: Incorporation of and of and strategic responses to world culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, USA.

Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 377 - 398, 01.04.2012

Gülay Dalgıç Şirin Karadeniz Elif Canan Onat

Öz

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin üniversite kavramını tanımlamak için kullandıkları mecaz ifadeleri saptamak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Veri toplamak amacıyla katılımcılardan “Üniversite ... gibidir çünkü ...” cümlesini tamamlamaları istenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde hem nitel hem de nicel yöntemler kullanılmıştır.Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, 837 katılımcı 13 kavramsal tema altında üniversite kavramına ilişkin toplam 335 adet geçerli metafor üretmiştir. Belirlenen kavramsal kategoriler ile cinsiyet, fakülte ve yaş değişkenleri arasından anlamlı ilişki saptanmamıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarının yükseköğretim yöneticilerine, politika yapıcılara ve akademisyenlere üniversite kavramının öğrenciler tarafından nasıl algılandığını saptamada önemli veri sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

üniversite kavramı metaforlar üniversite öğrencisi

Kaynakça

  • Baker, P. S. (1991). Metaphors of mindful engagement and a vision of better schools. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 32-35.
  • Bakioğlu, A., & Dalgıç, G. (2008). The effects of globalization on university policies. Education and Development Conference, Proceedings Abstract (5p), 07-09 March 2008, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Balcı, A. (2001). Öğrenci, öğretmen ve velilerin okul kavramlaştırmaları: Okulun metaforik bir analizi. X. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Sempozyumu III. Cilt. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Yayınları, 130-135.
  • Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 277-290.
  • Bredeson, P. V. (1985). The analysis of the metaphorical perspectives of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(1), 29-50.
  • Brock-Utne, B. (2002). The global forces affecting the education sector today - The universities in Europe as an example. Higher Education in Europe,27, 283-99.
  • Cerit, Y. (2006). School metaphors: The views of students, teachers and administrators. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 6(3), 692-699.
  • Cerit, Y. (2008). Öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin müdür kavramı ile ilgili metaforlara ilişkin görüşleri. Education & Sciences, 33(147), 3-13.
  • Chang, S. M. (1999). Impact of university education on students: An empirical study of Taiwanese university students’ experiences and learning. Taipei, Taiwan: Teacher Chang.
  • Chen, D. D. (2003). A classification system for metaphors about teaching. Journal Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72, 49-53.
  • Chiu, L. K. (1994). Values of university students in Taichung area. Journal of General Education, 3, 94-147.
  • Delaney, S. J. (1969). Student and the concept of a university. Studium, 2, 109-112.
  • Duderstadt, J. J. (1997). The future of the university in an era of change. Retrieved August, 23, 2011, from University of Michigan, The Millennium Project Web site: http://milproj.ummu.umich.edu/publications/change/download/change.pdf.
  • Evans, G. R. (2002). Academics and the real world. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Hacıfazlıoğlu, O., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Dalgıç, G. (2011). Okul yöneticilerinin teknoloji liderliğine ilişkin algıları: Metafor analizi örneği. EBAD, 1, 97-117.
  • Hamlyn, D.W. (1996). The concept of philosophy. Philosophy, 71(276), 205-218.
  • Inbar, D.E. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38(1), 77-92.
  • Iyi, S. (2002). Üniversitenin bütünleşmesinde etik’in önemi [Importance of ethics in the integration of university]. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Kültür Sanat Kurulu, 3-10.
  • Jarvis, P. (2006). The Bologna Process: Europeanization or globalization? Prospero, 12, 6-13.
  • Kaufman, J.,& Gabler, J. (2004). Cultural capital and the extracurricular activities of girls and boys in the college attainment process. Poetics, 32(2), 145-168.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago.
  • Lin, Y. (2010). Taiwanese university students’ perceptions of university life. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 189-202.
  • Mahlios, M., & Maxson, M. (1998). Metaphors as structures for elementary and secondary preservice teachers’ thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 227-240.
  • Miles, M. B.,& Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mohabedbhai, G. (2008). Globalization and its implications on universities and developing countries. Paper presented at One World Week, Forum on Global Universities Warwick University, 27 January, Coventry, UK.
  • Nakpodia, E. D. (2009). The concept of the university as learning organization: Its functions, techniques and possible ways of making it effective. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 1(5), 79-83.
  • Olufemi, S. O. (2007). Globalization, migration and brain drain: The experience of Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria. 14th Nordic Migration Researchers’ Conference, 14-16 November, Bergen, Norway.
  • Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar (Metaphors about school). Educational Administration: Theory and Practice,55, 459-496.
  • Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 281-326.
  • Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 290-305.
  • Saban, A., Kocbeker B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123–139.
  • Scott, P. (2003). Challenges to academic values and the organization of academic work in a time of globalization. Higher Education in Europe, 28, 295-303.
  • Silman, F. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Türkiye ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri okulları ve merkezi eğitim kurumlarına mecazlar yoluyla bir bakış. Araştırmaları(Eurasian Journal of Educational Research), 6(23), 177-187 Eğitim
  • Singh, K. (2010). Metaphor as a tool in educational leadership classrooms. Management in Education, 24(3), 127-131.
  • Şimşek, H. (1997). Metaphorical images of an organization: The power of symbolic constructs in reading change in higher education organizations. Higher Education, 33, 283-307.
  • Thomas, L.,& Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 762-769.
  • Verri, G. (2003). Challenges to academe in a time of globalization. Higher Education in Europe, 28(3), 307-310.
  • Weade, R., & Ernst, G. (1990). Pictures of life in classrooms, and the search for metaphors to frame them. Theory into Practice, 29(2), 133-140.
  • White, A. (1985). Meaning and effects of listening to popular music: Implications for counseling.
  • Journal of Counseling & Development 64(1), 65-9.
  • Yoder, B. L. (2006). Globalization of higher education in eight Chinese universities: Incorporation of and of and strategic responses to world culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, USA.
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gülay Dalgıç Bu kişi benim

Şirin Karadeniz Bu kişi benim

Elif Canan Onat Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Dalgıç, G., Karadeniz, Ş., & Onat, E. C. (2012). Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 377-398.
AMA Dalgıç G, Karadeniz Ş, Onat EC. Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. Nisan 2012;3(3):377-398.
Chicago Dalgıç, Gülay, Şirin Karadeniz, ve Elif Canan Onat. “Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors”. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 3, sy. 3 (Nisan 2012): 377-98.
EndNote Dalgıç G, Karadeniz Ş, Onat EC (01 Nisan 2012) Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 3 3 377–398.
IEEE G. Dalgıç, Ş. Karadeniz, ve E. C. Onat, “Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, c. 3, sy. 3, ss. 377–398, 2012.
ISNAD Dalgıç, Gülay vd. “Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 3/3 (Nisan 2012), 377-398.
JAMA Dalgıç G, Karadeniz Ş, Onat EC. Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2012;3:377–398.
MLA Dalgıç, Gülay vd. “Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors”. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, c. 3, sy. 3, 2012, ss. 377-98.
Vancouver Dalgıç G, Karadeniz Ş, Onat EC. Towards a New Understanding of University through Metaphors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2012;3(3):377-98.