Ketamine–propofol versus fentanyl–propofol for sedation in pediatric circumcision: A randomized double-blind trial
Abstract
Aim: Sedation for pediatric circumcision should ensure immobility, safety and rapid recovery. This randomized, double-blind trial compared ketamine–propofol with fentanyl–propofol in children.
Methods: ASA I–II patients aged 5–10 years scheduled for elective circumcision were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, without stratification or blocking to receive ketamine 1 mg/kg plus propofol 1 mg/kg (Group K) or fentanyl 1 μg/kg plus propofol 1 mg/kg (Group F). Sedation was titrated with 0.5 mg/kg propofol boluses to achieve a Ramsay Sedation Score > 5. The primary outcome was the total propofol consumption. Secondary outcomes included extremity movements (defined as gross extremity movement requiring interruption of the procedure or additional sedative administration), surgeon satisfaction, recovery time to Modified Aldrete Score ≥9, behavioral scores, pain scores, oxygen saturation and adverse events.
Results: Sixty of the 68 screened children were analyzed (n = 30 per group). Total propofol consumption was lower in Group K than in Group F (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3 mg/kg; p < 0.001). Intraoperative movements were less frequent in Group K (3.5 ± 2.3 vs. 6.0 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Recovery time and the incidence of adverse events were comparable between the groups. Heart rate trajectories were similar. Although SpO₂ values were higher in Group K at most intraoperative and early postoperative time points (p < 0.05), oxygen saturation remained within clinically acceptable limits in both groups and desaturation events were similar. Surgeon satisfaction, emergence behavior and pain scores were similar.
Conclusions: In pediatric circumcision, Group K provides lower propofol requirements and fewer intraoperative movements than Group F without prolonging recovery, increasing adverse events or lowering oxygen saturation. This is an effective and safe regimen that may improve operative conditions.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- Bassett KE, Anderson JL, Pribble CG, Guenther E. Propofol for procedural sedation in children in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(6):773-782. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00619-x
- Gulec H, Sahin S, Ozayar E, Degerli S, Bercin F, Ozdemir O. Ketamine-propofol sedation in circumcision. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2015;65(5):367-370. doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2014.03.002
- Coşkun AS. Comparing the effects of propofol and ketamine on the emergence agitation of male children undergoing circumcision. Annals of Pediatric Surgery.2022;18(1). doi:10.1186/s43159-021-00136-1
- Foo TY, Mohd Noor N, Yazid MB, Fauzi MH, Abdull Wahab SF, Ahmad MZ. Ketamine-propofol (Ketofol) for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):81. doi:10.1186/s12873-020-00373-4
- Smith I, Monk TG, White PF, Ding Y. Propofol infusion during regional anesthesia: sedative, amnestic, and anxiolytic properties. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(2):313-319. doi:10.1213/00000539-199408000-00020
- Bang YJ, Kim J, Gil NS, et al. Pulmonary Atelectasis After Sedation With Propofol vs Propofol-Ketamine for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(11):e2433029. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33029
- Aslan B, Moraloğlu Ö. Addition of Fentanyl or High-Dose Morphine to Bupivacaine Is Superior to Bupivacaine Alone during Single-Shot Spinal Anesthesia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(4):312-317. doi:10.1159/000509513
- Divya VS, Raghu R, Indira P, Roy S. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in elective lower abdominal surgeries. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2021;8(2):257-264. doi: 10.18231/j.ijca.2021.049
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Anaesthesiology
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 16, 2026
Submission Date
January 8, 2026
Acceptance Date
April 20, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 6 Number: 2