Technological Visionary or Security Risk?: A Psychobiographical Analysis of Elon Musk’s Leadership at the Intersection of Business and Geopolitics
Abstract
Keywords
Elon Musk , techno-politics , geopolitics , security strategies , leadership
References
- Alexander, I. E. (1988). Personality, psychological assessment, and psychobiography. Journal of Personality, 56(1), 265–294.
- Alexander, I. E. (1990). Personology: Method and content in personality assessment and psychobiography. Duke University Press.
- Arslan, A. C. (2025). Techno-populist leadership under techno-politics: The case of Musk effect. International Journal of Public Leadership, 21(3), 255–266.
- Ashforth, B. E., & Schinoff, B. S. (2016). Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 111–137.
- Aspinwall, L. G., & Staudinger, U. M. (2003). A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. American Psychological Association.
- Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Carton, A. M., Murphy, C., & Clark, J. R. (2014). A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1544–1570.
- DeNardis, L. (2020). The internet in everything: Freedom and security in a world with no off switch. Yale University Press.
- Dove-Jay, A. (2015, February 2). Why Mars is the next step for humanity. World Economic Forum.
- Elms, A. C. (1994). Uncovering lives: The uneasy alliance of biography and psychology. Oxford University Press.
