Exploring English as a foreign language students’ perceptions and needs of digital competences in a Turkish higher education context

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions of college students towards digital competences and how they evaluate their needs for competence in learning and using English as a foreign language (EFL). The participants are 20 students (10 males and 10 females) learning EFL at the school of foreign languages of a private university in İstanbul, Türkiye. Data were collected via a socio-demographic questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. For the analyses of the qualitative data, codes, and themes were determined and organized according to the inductive thematic analysis approach, for which Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step procedure was followed. The results revealed themes of skills for digitalization, ownership of digital tools, positive attitudes towards digital competences in language education, needs relating to language use and learning: assessment, communication, interaction, resources, information, lessons and teachers, and finally, differences between before and after distance education in terms of digital competences. Compared with the present literature, tertiary level EFL learners have positive views of digital competences that cover widely accepted definitions and perceive their own digital competence levels as sufficient, teachers are perceived as having more digital competence than students. Digital competences are widely used in lessons, extracurricular activities, and assessment-evaluation processes, even though school curricula do not sufficiently prioritise them. They also believe that they need similar digital competences in foreign language education, parallel to literature. Although it has been shown that the school gives students enough opportunity to enhance their digital competences, there are still several suggestions made by the participants to advance their academic and professional goals. Furthermore, it is thought that national higher education policies do not place enough emphasis on this issue. In conclusion, digital competences should be prioritised, according to suggestions made by national policymakers, institution administrators, and university instructors as well as students.

Keywords

• Digital competences
• distance education
• English as a foreign language
• perceptions

References

1. Ahmed, S. T. & Roche, T. (2021). Making the connection: Examining the relationship between undergraduate students’ digital literacy and academic success in an English medium instruction (EMI) university. Education and Information Techs, 26, 4601-4620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10443-0
2. Akman, Y. (2021). Dijital okuryazarlık, çevrim içi öğrenme ve akademik isteklilik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between digital literacy, online learning and academic enthusiasm]. TEBD, 19(2), 1012-1036. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.982846
3. Aktamış, H., & Arıcı, V. A. (2013). The effects of using virtual reality software in teaching astronomy subjects on academic achievement and retention. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.905
4. Alakrash, H. M., & Abdul Razak, N. (2021). Technology-based language learning: Investigation of digital technology and digital literacy. Sustainability, 13(21), 12304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112304
5. Alférez-Pastor, M., Collado-Soler, R., Lérida-Ayala, V., Manzano-León, A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., & Trigueros, R. (2023). Training digital competences in future primary school teachers: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(5), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050461
6. Arslan, S. (2019). İlkokullarda ve ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examining the digital literacy levels of teachers working in primary and secondary schools in terms of various variables] [Master’s thesis] Sakarya University.
7. Baş, B., & Yıldırım, T. (2018). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretiminde teknoloji entegrasyonu [Technology integration in teaching Turkish to foreigners]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(3), 827-839. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.415059
8. Başaran, B. (2017). Yabancı dil öğretiminde teknoloji kullanımına ilişkin hazırlanmış lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [Examination of postgraduate theses on the use of technology in foreign language teaching]. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(23), 15-40 http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12126

9. Boz, M. S., & Çoban, Ö. (2015). Yabancı dil eğitiminde teknoloji kullanımı. Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Innovation and Educational Technologies. Available at http://fclturkiye.eba.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Yabanci-Dil-Egitiminde-Teknoloji-Kullanimi-2015.pdf
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
11. Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
12. Casañ-Pitarch, R., & Candel-Mora, M. Á. (2021). Developing language, content, and digital competence through international telecollaborative project work. Teaching English with Technology, 21(1), 29-47. https://tewtjournal.org/download/3-developing-language-content-and-digital-competence-through-international-telecollaborative-project-work-by-ricardo-casan-pitarch-and-miguel-angel-candel-mora/
13. Cook, H., Apps, T., Beckman, K., & Bennett, S. (2023). Digital competence for emergency remote teaching in higher education: Understanding the present and anticipating the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10194-4
14. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
15. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
16. Day, C. (2002). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203021316
17. Dempsey, M., & Burke, J. (2020). COVID-19 Practice in Primary Schools in Ireland: A Two-month Project Follow-up Report. Maynooth University Press.
18. Doğan, D. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kendilerine ilişkin dijital okuryazarlık algıları [University students' self-perceptions of digital literacy]. Eğitimde Teknoloji Uygulamaları Dergisi, 1(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.29329/jtae.2020.283.2
19. Duran, E., & Özen, N. E. (2018). Türkçe derslerinde dijital okuryazarlık [Digital literacy in Turkish lessons]. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 31-46.
20. Durodolu, O. O., & Mojapelo, S. M. (2020). Contextualisation of the Information Literacy Environment in the South African Education Sector. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.18.1.005
21. European Commission (2006). The key competences for lifelong learning – a European framework. Official Journal of the European Union, 49(12), 394. Available at https://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbf53843-a9b5-4837-adeb-65c49a1bbf44.0005.05/DOC_1
22. European Commission (2007a). Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament - Improving the Quality of Teacher Education. Available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1470f875-50bb-4331-a41d-9f1783d1b09c
23. European Commission (2007b). Key competences for lifelong learning: European Reference Framework, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Publications Office. Available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5719a044-b659-46de-b58b-606bc5b084c1
24. European Commission, (2013). High Level Group on the Modernisation of Higher Education: Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe's higher education institutions, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/42468
25. European Commission (2018). Proposal for a council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
26. European Parliament. (2006). Recommendation of The European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?uri=celex:32006H096
27. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Román-Graván, P., Montenegro-Rueda, M., López-Meneses, E., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2021). Digital teaching competence in higher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 11(11), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110689
28. Gençtürk-Erdem, E., Başar, F. B., Toktay, G., Yayğaz, İ. H. ve Küçüksüleymanoğlu, R. (2021). E-twinning projelerinin öğretmenlerin dijital okuryazarlık becerilerine katkısı [The contribution of e-twinning projects to teachers' digital literacy skills]. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 7(3), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.901129
29. Gezer, U., & Ersoy, A. F. (2021). The Effect of Activities Based on Mobile Applications on Academic Achievement, Critical Thinking Skills and Motivation in Social Studies Course. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International (AJESI), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.921684
30. Göldağ, Ö. Ü. B., & Kanat, Ö. Ü. S. (2018). Güzel sanatlar eğitimi alan öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık durumları [Digital literacy status of students studying fine arts]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 70, 77-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7736
31. Gürleroğlu, L. (2019). 5E modeline uygun web 2.0 uygulamaları ile gerçekleştirilen fen bilimleri öğretiminin öğrenci başarısına motivasyonuna tutumuna ve dijital okuryazarlığına etkisinin incelenmesi [Examining the effect of science teaching carried out with web 2.0 applications in accordance with the 5E model on student success, motivation, attitude and digital literacy] [Doctoral dissertation] Marmara University. Available at https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/5e-modeline-uygun-web-2-0-uygulamaları-ile/docview/2469115393/se-2
32. Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educase. Review, 27, 1–12.
33. Humpl, S., & Andersen, T. (2022). The future of digital and online learning in higher education. Luxembourg: EU Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/587756
34. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J. & Robinson, L. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. MacArthur Foundation.
35. Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008
36. Karmila, D., Berlian, M., & Pratama, D. O. (2021). The role of interactive videos in mathematics learning activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020) (pp. 141-144). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210227.024
37. Kayaduman, H., & Battal, A. (2020). The relationship between digital literacy and distance education perceptions. ICERI2020 Proceedings, 2223-2227. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.0533
38. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328
39. Korkmaz, Ö., Vergili, M., Çakır, R., & Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2019). Plickers web 2.0 ölçme ve değerlendirme uygulamasının öğrencilerin sınav kaygıları ve başarıları üzerine etkisi [The effect of Plickers web 2.0 measurement and evaluation application on students' exam anxiety and success]. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 15-37. https://dx.doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2019.05.02.002
40. Koyuncuoglu, D. (2022). Analysis of digital and technological competences of university students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 10(4), 971-988. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2583
41. Kozan, M. & Bulut Özek, M. (2019). BÖTE bölümü öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi [Examining the digital literacy levels of pre-service CET department teachers and their sensitivity towards cyberbullying]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538657
42. Kuru, E. (2019). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık kavramına ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of social studies teacher candidates regarding the concept of digital literacy]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(3), 1629-1648. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies
43. Lázaro-Cantabrana, J., Usart-Rodríguez, M., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2019). Assessing teacher digital competence: The construction of an instrument for measuring the knowledge of pre-service teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370
44. López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital competence in three areas of the DigCom 2.1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 69-88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5583
45. Meniado, J. C. (2023). Digital language teaching 5.0: Technologies, trends and competences. RELC Journal, 54(2), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231160610
46. Mete, F., & Batıbay, E. F. (2019). Web 2.0 uygulamalarının Türkçe eğitiminde motivasyona etkisi: Kahoot örneği [The effect of Web 2.0 applications on motivation in Turkish education: Kahoot example]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(4), 1029-1047. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.616756
47. Metin, T. N. (2022). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile öğrenme stilleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi [Determining the relationship between digital literacy levels and learning styles of secondary school students]. [Master's thesis] Aydın Adnan Menderes University.
48. Nawaz, A., & Kundi, G. M. (2010). Digital literacy: An analysis of the contemporary paradigms.Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 1(2), 19-29.
49. Onursoy, S. (2018). Üniversite gençliğinin dijital okuryazarlik düzeyleri: Anadolu üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma [Digital literacy levels of university youth: A research on Anadolu University students]. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(2), 989-1013. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.422671
50. Ortaakarsu, F., & Sülün, Y. (2022). Web 2.0 araçlarının fen bilimleri dersi DNA ve genetik kod ünitesinde motivasyona etkisi: Kahoot! örneği [The effect of Web 2.0 tools on motivation in the science course DNA and genetic code unit: Kahoot! case]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 62, 617-639. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1076079
51. Özbay, M., & Özdemir, O. (2014). Türkçe öğretim programı için bir öneri: Dijital okuryazarlığa yönelik amaç ve kazanımlar / A suggestion for Turkish Teaching Curriculum: Digital literacy objectives and standards. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları, 2(2), 31-40.
52. Özden Köse, Ö., Bayram, H. & Benzer, E. (2021). Web 2.0 destekli argümantasyon uygulamalarının ortaokul öğrencilerinin kuvvet ve enerji konusundaki başarılarına, tartışmacı ve teknoloji tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of Web 2.0 supported argumentation applications on secondary school students' achievements in force and energy, and their argumentative and technology attitudes.]. Erciyes Journal of Education, 5(2), 179-207. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.913505
53. Öztürk, M., & Akgün, Ö. E. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal paylaşım sitelerini kullanma amaçları ve bu sitelerin eğitimlerinde kullanılması ile ilgili görüşleri [University students' purposes of using social networking sites and their opinions about the use of these sites in their education.]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 49-67.
54. Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts–a review of literature. Education and information technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
55. Poçan, S., Altay, B., & Yaşaroğlu, C. (2023). The effects of mobile technology on learning performance and motivation in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 683-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6
56. Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Strengthening your district through technology. Hippasus. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2006_11.html
57. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. In Y. Punie (Ed.), EUR 28775 EN. EU Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/159770
58. Research and Markets. (2023, May 28). EdTech Market – Global Outlook & Forecast 2022-2027. Available at https://www.researchandmarkets.com/report/education-software#product%E2%80%94adaptive
59. Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago C. R., & Sánchez-Compaña, M. T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1304185
60. Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
61. Supratman, L. P., & Wahyudin, A. (2017). Digital media literacy to higher students in Indonesia. Int. Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 2(5), 51-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.24001/ijels.2.5.7
62. Şimşek, İ., & Tuncer, C. A. N. (2019). Yüksek öğretimde sanal gerçeklik kullanımı ile ilgili yapılan araştırmalara yönelik içerik analizi [Content analysis of research on the use of virtual reality in higher education]. Folklor/edebiyat, 25(97), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.928
63. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Willey & Sons.
64. Trubavina, I., Dotsenko, S., Naboka, O., Chaikovskyi, M., & Meshko, H. (2021). Developing digital competence of teachers of Humanitarian disciplines in the conditions of COVID-19 quarantine measures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012052
65. Turkish Ministry of National Education. (2017). General Competences for Teaching Profession. Turkish Ministry of National Education Directorate General for Teacher Training and Development. Available at http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_06/29111119_TeachersGeneralCompetencies.pdf
66. Turkish Ministry of National Education (2019). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu [2023 Education Vision]. Ministry of National Education Publications. Available at https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_E%C4%9Fitim%20Vizyonu.pdf
67. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601971
68. UNCTAD. (2019). Building digital competences to benefit from frontier technologies. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Available at https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2019d3_en.pdf
69. Uyar, A. (2021). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri [Digital literacy levels of vocational school students]. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 198-211.
70. Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
71. Wong, Y. C., Ho, K. M., Chen, H., Gu, D. & Zeng, Q. (2015). Digital divide challenges of children in low-income families: The case of Shanghai. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(1), 53- 71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2014.998576
72. YÖKAK. (2016). Türkiye Yeterlilikler Çerçevesi (TQF) published on Official Gazette Available at https://yokak.gov.tr/Common/Docs/Enqa/TYC_teblig_Tr.pdf
73. Yustika, G. P. & Iswati, S. (2020). Digital literacy in formal online education: A short review. Dinamika Pendidikan, 15(1), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v15i1.23779
74. Zawacki-Richter, O., Conrad, D., Bozkurt, A., Aydin, C., Bedenlier, S., Jung, I., Stöter, J., Veletsianos, G., Blaschke, L., Bond, M., Broens, A., Bruhn, E., Dolch, C., Kalz, M., Kondakci, Y., Marin, V., Mayrberger, K., Müskens, W., Naidu, S., Qayyum, A., Roberts, J., Sangrà, A., Loglo, F., Slagter van Tryon, P., Xiao, J. & Kerres, M. (2020). Elements of open education: an invitation to future research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4659
75. Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & education, 168, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212