Deterring cheating using a complex assessment design: A case study

Year 2021, , 55 - 77, 27.06.2021

Sonja Bjelobaba

https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.936053

Cited By: 5

An Erratum to this article was published on December 31, 2023. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/literacytrek/issue/82036/1392516

Abstract

Attempts to translate written examinations normally conducted in a lecture hall to an online environment during emergency remote learning in response to COVID-19 have not proved entirely successful, and have led to a sharp increase in cases of suspected misconduct. This paper describes a case study which gives insights on the relationship between assessment design and academic integrity: Is it possible to deter students from cheating by means of assessment design? Previous research does promote certain assessment types, but also indicates that there is no single assessment type that students think is impossible to cheat on. The solution proposed in this paper is therefore to add complexity to the mixture. An alternative complex assessment design comprising several steps is introduced and exemplified by an assessment procedure piloted in a grammar course for preservice language teachers in mother tongue tuition. The design promotes academic integrity, signature pedagogy, student-centred learning, and collaboration within a community of practice in an online setting.

Keywords

academic integrity, contract cheating, preservice education, mother tongue tuition, Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian

References

• Afzali, Z., & Izadpanah, S. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on Iranian English foreign language learners: Engagement and motivation in English language grammar. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1870801. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1870801
• Afzali, Z., & Izadpanah, S. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on Iranian English foreign language learners: Engagement and motivation in English language grammar. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1870801. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1870801
• Altınay, Z. (2017). Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1232752
• Altınay, Z. (2017). Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1232752
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
• Beck, V. (2014). Testing a model to predict online cheating—Much ado about nothing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514646
• Beck, V. (2014). Testing a model to predict online cheating—Much ado about nothing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514646
• Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional Scaffolding: Foundations and Evolving Definition. In B. R. Belland (Ed.), Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education: Strategies and Efficacy Evidence (pp. 17–53). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_2
• Bertram Gallant, T. (2017). Academic integrity as a teaching & learning issue: From theory to practice. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1308173
• Bertram Gallant, T., Binkin, N., & Donohue, M. (2015). Students at risk for being reported for cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9235-5
• Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. JSTOR.
• Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (2.). The Society for Research into Higher Education.
• Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (4., [rev.]). Open University Press.
• Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (4., [rev.]). Open University Press.
• Bjelobaba, S. (2019). Contract cheating in Serbia and in Sweden. Studies for Changing Societies, 1.
• Bjelobaba, S. (2020). Academic integrity teacher training: Preventive pedagogical practices on the course level. In Z. Khan, C. Hill, & T. Foltýnek (Eds.), Integrity in education for future happiness (pp. 9–18). Mendel University in Brno. http://academicintegrity.eu/conference/proceedings/2020/bjelobaba.pdf
• Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Ballester, C. P. (2008, October 1). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning and Technology.
• Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Sherin, M. G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(1), 90–114.
• Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Sherin, M. G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(1), 90–114.
• Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R.-M. (2016). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uu/detail.action?docID=4659728
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019a). Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., van Haeringen, K., Saddiqui, S., & Rozenberg, P. (2019b). Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1527892
• Burgason, K. A., Sefiha, O., & Briggs, L. (2019). Cheating is in the eye of the beholder: an evolving understanding of academic misconduct. Innovative Higher Education, 44(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9457-3
• Chang, H., & Windeatt, S. (2016). Developing collaborative learning practices in an online language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1271–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1274331
• Chang, H., & Windeatt, S. (2016). Developing collaborative learning practices in an online language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1271–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1274331
• Cheng, T. J. (2015). The reality behind the hype – Online world language teaching and instructional design (1658543392) [Ed.D., Teachers College, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; Social Science Premium Collection.
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of 2nd International Plagiarism Conference Newcastle, UK, 14.
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of 2nd International Plagiarism Conference Newcastle, UK, 14.
• Croft, N., Dalton, A., & Grant, M. (2010). Overcoming isolation in distance learning: Building a learning community through time and space. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 5(1), 27–64. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2010.05010027
• Danielowich, R. M., & McCarthy, M. J. (2013). Teacher educators as learners: How supervisors shape their pedagogies by creating and using classroom videos with their student teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 35(3), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2013.806231
• Eaton, S. (2020). Academic Integrity During COVID-19: Reflections from the University of Calgary. International Studies in Educational Administration, 48(1), 80–85.
• Eaton, S., Brown, B., Schroeder, M., Lock, J., & Jacobsen, M. (2017). Signature pedagogies for e-learning in higher education and beyond, 25. Education Act (2010:800). Sweden. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800
• Education Act. (2015/16:173). Fjärrundervisning och entreprenad - nya möjligheter för undervisning och studiehandledning på modersmål.
• Ellis, C., van Haeringen, K., Harper, R., Bretag, T., Zucker, I., McBride, S., Rozenberg, P., Newton, P., & Saddiqui, S. (2020). Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956
• Ellis, C., van Haeringen, K., Harper, R., Bretag, T., Zucker, I., McBride, S., Rozenberg, P., Newton, P., & Saddiqui, S. (2020). Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956
• English, C. (2007). Finding a voice in a threaded discussion group: Talking about literature online. English Journal, 97(1), 56–61. Arts & Humanities Database; Social Science Premium Collection.
• Enkin, E., & Mejías‐Bikandi, E. (2017). The effectiveness of online teaching in an advanced Spanish language course. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12112
• Enkin, E., & Mejías‐Bikandi, E. (2017). The effectiveness of online teaching in an advanced Spanish language course. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12112
• Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: an exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4
• Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: an exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4
• Esterhazy, R., De Lange, T., & Møystad, A. (2021). How do signature pedagogies get their signatures? The role of assessment and professional artefacts in preparing students for their professions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1902273
• Esterhazy, R., De Lange, T., & Møystad, A. (2021). How do signature pedagogies get their signatures? The role of assessment and professional artefacts in preparing students for their professions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1902273
• Fuller, R., Joynes, V., Cooper, J., Boursicot, K., & Roberts, T. (2020). Could COVID-19 be our ‘There is no alternative’ (TINA) opportunity to enhance assessment? Medical Teacher, 42(7), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779206
• Fuller, R., Joynes, V., Cooper, J., Boursicot, K., & Roberts, T. (2020). Could COVID-19 be our ‘There is no alternative’ (TINA) opportunity to enhance assessment? Medical Teacher, 42(7), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779206
• Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S. (2020). Planned online language education versus crisis-prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12460
• Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S. (2020). Planned online language education versus crisis-prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12460
• Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. de, & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301
• Gibbons, S., & Farley, A. N. (2020). Learning to think like a teacher: Effects of video reflection on preservice teachers’ practice and pedagogy. Action in Teacher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1812131
• Goertler, S., & Gacs, A. (2018). Assessment in online German: Assessment methods and results. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 51(2), 156-174,202. Social Science Premium Collection.
• González‐Lloret, M. (2020). Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12466
• González‐Lloret, M. (2020). Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12466
• Harper, R., Bretag, T., & Rundle, K. (2021). Detecting contract cheating: examining the role of assessment type. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1724899
• Harper, R., Bretag, T., & Rundle, K. (2021). Detecting contract cheating: examining the role of assessment type. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1724899
• Harris, L., Harrison, D., McNally, D., & Ford, C. (2020). Academic integrity in an online culture: Do McCabe’s findings hold true for online, adult learners? Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09335-3
• Hart, L., & Morgan, L. (2010). Academic integrity in an online registered nurse to baccalaureate in nursing program. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(11), 498–505. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.3928/00220124-20100701-03
• Hernández, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? Higher Education, 64(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9506-7
• Hernández, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? Higher Education, 64(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9506-7
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
• Hodgkinson, T., Curtis, H., MacAlister, D., & Farrell, G. (2016). Student academic dishonesty: The potential for situational prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1064982
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
• James, R. (2016). Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0015-0
• Karim, M. N., Kaminsky, S. E., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z
• Karttunen, M., & Juusola, S. (2019). Maintaining quality online: Piloting an online language course for immigrants in Finland. Languages, 4(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020025
• Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., & Raghuraman, R. S. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309–314.
• Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., & Raghuraman, R. S. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309–314.
• Kidwell, L. A., & Kent, J. (2008). Integrity at a distance: A Study of academic misconduct among university students on and off campus. Accounting Education, 17(sup1), S3–S16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802044568
• Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2015). Post-graduate student performance in ‘supervised in-class’ vs. ‘unsupervised online’ multiple choice tests: implications for cheating and test security. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(7), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956683
• Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2015). Post-graduate student performance in ‘supervised in-class’ vs. ‘unsupervised online’ multiple choice tests: implications for cheating and test security. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(7), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956683
• Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: a Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0
• Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: a Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0
• Lanier, M. M. (2006). Academic integrity and distance Learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250600866166
• Lucky, A., Branham, M., & Atchison, R. (2019). Collection-based education by distance and face to face: Learning outcomes and academic dishonesty. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-9770-8
• Medina, M. S., & Castleberry, A. N. (2016). Proctoring strategies for computer-based and paper-based tests. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 73(5), 274–277. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp150678
• Medina, M. S., & Castleberry, A. N. (2016). Proctoring strategies for computer-based and paper-based tests. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 73(5), 274–277. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp150678
• Miller, A., & Young-Jones, A. D. (2012). Academic integrity: Online classes compared to face-to-face classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(3/4), 138–145. Social Science Premium Collection.
• Moallem, M., Chen, S., & Kermani, H. (2005). Using handheld, wireless computers to improve assessment of learning and instruction. Educational Technology, 45(6), 12–21. JSTOR.
• Moneypenny, D. B., & Aldrich, R. S. (2016, July 1). Online and face-to-face language learning: A comparative analysis of oral proficiency in introductory Spanish. Journal of Educators Online. https://doaj.org
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
• Moranski, K., & Kim, F. (2016). ‘Flipping’ lessons in a multi‐section Spanish course: Implications for assigning explicit grammar instruction outside of the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 830–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12366
• Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00067
• Nguyen, J. G., Keuseman, K. J., & Humston, J. J. (2020). Minimize online cheating for online assessments during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3429–3435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00790
• Olt, M. R. (2002). Ethics and distance education: Strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in online assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/olt53.html
• Pardede, P. (2019). Pre-service EFL teachers’ perception of blended learning. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i1.955
• Peeters, W. (2018). Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: a taxonomy of the online peer interaction process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 905–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465982
• Peeters, W. (2018). Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: a taxonomy of the online peer interaction process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 905–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465982
• Pettersson, F., & Hjelm, P. (2020). Feature: Researching and developing remote teaching in mother tongue tuition. https://doi.org/10.26203/R9KJ-TF14
• Pettersson, F., & Hjelm, P. (2020). Feature: Researching and developing remote teaching in mother tongue tuition. https://doi.org/10.26203/R9KJ-TF14
• Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 emergency: student and academic staff perceptions of academic integrity in the transition to online exams at three Australian universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9
• Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 emergency: student and academic staff perceptions of academic integrity in the transition to online exams at three Australian universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection.
• Salcedo, C. S. (2010). Comparative analysis of learning outcomes in face-to-face foreign language classes vs. language lab and online. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 43–54. Social Science Premium Collection.
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. JSTOR.
• Simonson, M. R., Smaldino, S. E., & Zvacek, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: foundations of distance education (7th ed.). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
• Slade, C., Rowland, S., & McGrath, D. (2019). Talking about contract cheating: facilitating a forum for collaborative development of assessment practices to combat student dishonesty. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1521813
• Slade, C., Rowland, S., & McGrath, D. (2019). Talking about contract cheating: facilitating a forum for collaborative development of assessment practices to combat student dishonesty. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1521813
• Stoytcheva, M. (2021). Developing a sense of belonging in a collaborative distance learning course: Breaking isolation in online learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2333(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043330
• Stoytcheva, M. (2021). Developing a sense of belonging in a collaborative distance learning course: Breaking isolation in online learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2333(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043330
• Stuber-McEwen, D., Wiseley, P., & Hoggatt, S. (2009). Point, click, and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in the virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall123/stuber123.html
• UKÄ. (2021). Disciplinärenden 2019 och 2020 vid universitet och högskolor (2021:8). Universitetskanslersämbetet. https://www.uka.se/download/18.3fca4e4d177db4cf57265e2/1615828497166/Rapport%202021-03-16%20Disciplin%C3%A4renden%202019%20och%202020%20vid%20universitet%20och%20h%C3%B6gskolor.pdf
• UKÄ. (2021). Disciplinärenden 2019 och 2020 vid universitet och högskolor (2021:8). Universitetskanslersämbetet. https://www.uka.se/download/18.3fca4e4d177db4cf57265e2/1615828497166/Rapport%202021-03-16%20Disciplin%C3%A4renden%202019%20och%202020%20vid%20universitet%20och%20h%C3%B6gskolor.pdf
• van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500527685
• van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500527685
• van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1317125
• Watt, D. (2019). Video production in elementary teacher education as a critical digital literacy practice. Media and Communication (Lisboa), 7(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1967
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
• Yanto, E. S., Triyani, G., & Pravitasari, H. (2020). Engaging students in a flipped classroom instruction: Junior high school grammar program. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v3i2.3468
• Yates, R. W., & Beaudrie, B. (2009). The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902850601