Understanding of L2 Reading Comprehension

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, - , 26.01.2016

Chimedlkham Erdenebaatar Erdenebaatar Leyla Harputlu

Öz

Among the four language skills, reading has always been the most challenging one in all parts of students’ academic studies. It is safe to say that the majority of humans are able to read in their first language at some basic levels. In globalized world, productive and educated citizens will require stronger literacy abilities, including reading, writing and even speaking and communicative usages in society. Most of the societies and countries around the world are multilingual, and people are facing an increased need for speaking well in more than one language. Within this larger context, reading in second language (L2) settings continues to take on increasing importance. English is not only considered as a global language for communication but also it is a language for science, technology, literature and advanced academic research. Benefits of second language needs give us a greater global understanding of the world such as knowing many fascinating cultures around the world, academic achievement and so on. Therefore this part is devoted to the understanding of reading comprehension, process of reading comprehension, reading strategies and sources of reading difficulties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, D., & Paris.S. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364-373.
• Alberto, A., Sanchez, P., Alvarez, M., Cuevas, I., & Lean Antonio. (2013). Evidence for top down processing in reading comprehension of children. Psicilogia Educativa, 19, 83-88.
• Almasi, J.F., & King, S. (2012). The Teaching strategic process in reading. NY: The Guilford Press.
• Bernhardt. E, (1991). Reading development in a second language. USA: Aplex Publishing.
• Bernhardt. E, (1995). Interpreting relationship between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and linguistic interdependence hypothesis. Applied Linguistics. 16, 15-34.
• Brantmeier, C. (2002). L2 reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizabilty. The Reading Matrix, 2, 1-19.
• Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (2008). Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A Cognitive Perspective. Guilford Press.
• Carr, S & Thompson, B. (1996). The effect of prior knowledge and schema activation strategies on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 19, 48-90.
• Çubukcu. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research. 18, 1-11.
• Damico, J.S., Campano, G., & Harste, J.C. (2009). Transactional and critical theory in reading comprehension. In Israel. S.E, & Duffy, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. Indiana University (177-189). New York: Indiana University Press.
• Elabsy, T. (2013). Successful reading strategies for second language learners. Theory to Practice. Outskirts Press.
• Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English as a Second Language Learners’ cognitive reading processes: A review of research in US. Review of Educational Research. 65, 145-190.
• Goatly, A. (2000). Critical reading and writing. London: Routledge Press.
• Goodman, K.S. (1979). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specilists, 6, 126-135.
• Gough, P. (1972). One second of reading. In: J.F. Kavanagh & I.G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language is by ear and by eye. (pp. 331-358). MA: MIT Press.
• Grabe, W, & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. UK. Pearson.
• Gunning, T. (2002). Assessing and correcting reading and writing difficulties. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension. discourse processes, 39, 125-128.
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. NY. Cambridge University Press.
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheory, R. (2001). Differences in the metacognitve awareness of reading Among native and nonnative readers. Elsevier Science, 29, 431-449.
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheory, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awarness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental education, 25, 2-10.
• Paris, S., Wasik,B.,& Turner, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. Handbook of Reading Research, 2, 609-640.
• Rayner, K.(1990). Comprehension processes: Introduction. In Balota, D., & Rayner, K. (Eds.), Comprehension process in reading (pp. 1-6). New Jersey.
• Reyner, J. (2008). The reading wars: Phonic versus whole language. Retrieved from October, 19, Northern Arizona University. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/jar/Reading_Wars.html
• Robeck, M.C., & Wallance, R.W. (1990). The psychology of reading: An Interdisciplinary approach. NJ: Hillsdale.
• Rosenblatt, M. (1985). The transactional theory of literary work: Implication for Research
• Rosenblatt, M. (1988). Writing and reading: The transactional theory. Reading Research and Education Center Report, 416, retrieved October, 10, 2015, fro ERIC ARTICLE database.
• Ruddell, R.B., & Singer, H. (1994). Theoretical models and process of reading. The Modern Language Journal, 71, 77-78.
• Schmeck, R. (1988). An introduction to learning strategies and learning styles. In Schmek, R. (Eds.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 3-15). New York. Plenum Press.
• Siegal, L.S. (2003). IQ- discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD. Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Learning Disability, 36, 2-3.
• Wallance, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Springer Press.