Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 52 - 74, 22.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1118394

Abstract

References

  • Abidin, T. N. (2019). Analysis of deixis in the spongebob squarepants movie: A pragmatic. [Doctoral Dissertation, Iain Salatiga].
  • Al-Saif, F. H. (2008). Deixis in English and Arabic: A semantic-pragmatic study and its pedagogical implications. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pune]. Shodhganga. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/3247
  • Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1349–1362.
  • Clark, E. V. (1974). Is he coming or going? On the acquisition of deictic verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.
  • Corrales, J. G., Torre, A. J., Coraizaca, D. M., & Novillo, A. C. (2020). Deictic expressions and reading comprehension. Explorator ED Digital. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v4i2.1199
  • Demir-Lira, E., So, W. C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 27(6), 844-867.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press .
  • Nuttall, C. (1997). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Heinemann.
  • Ögeyik, M. C. (2007). Deictic expressions and the types of deixis in Turkish narratives. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 22, 8-18.
  • Purba, J. F., Pangaribuan, R. E., & Sihite, J. (2014). An analysis of deixis used in John’s book, Holy Bible. The Episteme Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 63-84.
  • Rij, J. v., Rijn, H. v., Hendriks, P., Keller, F., & Reitter, D. (2011). WM load influences the interpretation of referring expressions. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (pp. 67–75). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  • Slik, F. V., Hout, R. v., & Schepens, J. J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition: Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 countries with 49 mother tongues. PlosOne, 10(11), 1-22.
  • Varzegar, M. (1995). The discoursal aspects of reading comprehension. Pazhuhesh, 11, 109-120.
  • Wightman, M. (2020). Gender differences in second language learning: Why they exist. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. Available at https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2371
  • Windiarsi P., W. (2006). A study on the deixis recognition in the reading comprehension of the second semester students of the English education program of Sanata Dharma University. Skripsi thesis , Sanata Dharma University. Retrieved from http://repository.usd.ac.id/id/eprint/22379
  • Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Contributions of the deixis clarified to the reading comprehension competence of the 6th graders

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 52 - 74, 22.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1118394

Abstract

Deixis are generally expressed as words or phrases whose meaning changes depending on who is talking, who is listening, where and when it is spoken (I, you, here, there, yesterday etc.). Foreign language learners have difficulties in decoding deixis in reading and listening skills. Therefore, this study aims at discussing how well the 6th graders are able to comprehend deixis in a written discourse. In order to collect data, twenty-two students have divided into two groups with even numbers as control and experimental groups. The 6th graders in experimental group have been given three different written texts in which deixis are clarified in parenthesis just after the use deictic words whereas the 6th graders in control group have been given the same three different written texts without identified deixis. The data have been collected through the reading comprehension questions after each text used in both groups. The findings have been analyzed by the SPSS 22 version program and t-test. As a result, the analysis indicates that there is a significant difference between the graders in both groups. The 6th graders in the experimental group seem more successful in reading comprehension than those in the control group because of the deictic words clarified.

References

  • Abidin, T. N. (2019). Analysis of deixis in the spongebob squarepants movie: A pragmatic. [Doctoral Dissertation, Iain Salatiga].
  • Al-Saif, F. H. (2008). Deixis in English and Arabic: A semantic-pragmatic study and its pedagogical implications. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pune]. Shodhganga. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/3247
  • Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1349–1362.
  • Clark, E. V. (1974). Is he coming or going? On the acquisition of deictic verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.
  • Corrales, J. G., Torre, A. J., Coraizaca, D. M., & Novillo, A. C. (2020). Deictic expressions and reading comprehension. Explorator ED Digital. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v4i2.1199
  • Demir-Lira, E., So, W. C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 27(6), 844-867.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press .
  • Nuttall, C. (1997). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Heinemann.
  • Ögeyik, M. C. (2007). Deictic expressions and the types of deixis in Turkish narratives. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 22, 8-18.
  • Purba, J. F., Pangaribuan, R. E., & Sihite, J. (2014). An analysis of deixis used in John’s book, Holy Bible. The Episteme Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 63-84.
  • Rij, J. v., Rijn, H. v., Hendriks, P., Keller, F., & Reitter, D. (2011). WM load influences the interpretation of referring expressions. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (pp. 67–75). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  • Slik, F. V., Hout, R. v., & Schepens, J. J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition: Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 countries with 49 mother tongues. PlosOne, 10(11), 1-22.
  • Varzegar, M. (1995). The discoursal aspects of reading comprehension. Pazhuhesh, 11, 109-120.
  • Wightman, M. (2020). Gender differences in second language learning: Why they exist. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. Available at https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2371
  • Windiarsi P., W. (2006). A study on the deixis recognition in the reading comprehension of the second semester students of the English education program of Sanata Dharma University. Skripsi thesis , Sanata Dharma University. Retrieved from http://repository.usd.ac.id/id/eprint/22379
  • Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Zehra Özturan 0000-0002-5003-4212

Nalan Kızıltan 0000-0002-7427-363X

Publication Date June 22, 2022
Submission Date May 18, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özturan, Z., & Kızıltan, N. (2022). Contributions of the deixis clarified to the reading comprehension competence of the 6th graders. The Literacy Trek, 8(1), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1118394

Creative Commons License The content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright rests with the author; The Literacy Trek must be referred properly.