Are neighborhood characteristics associated with physical activity levels among school children?

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of insufficient physical activity (IPA) and neighborhood characteristics associated with it, among school children. The impact of sociodemographic characteristics and ownership of electronic devices on physical activity (PA) were also evaluated. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out among 5-7th grade students attending schools and their parents. IPA was defined as having moderate-vigorous activity for <60 minutes per week. Sociodemographic factors, ownership of electronic devices and characteristics of the neighborhoods were also evaluated. Results: A total of 334 students participated in the study. The prevalence of IPA was 79.3% (95%CI:75.0-83.7%). IPA was associated with ownership of mobile phones (OR:1.96, 95%CI:1.01-3.78), not being a member of a sports team (OR:2.83, 95%CI:1.21-6.58) and having ≤1 day of physical education classes at school (OR:2.10, 95%CI:1.08-4.09). Neighborhood characteristics were not associated with IPA (p>0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of IPA is alarmingly high among school children. The impact of neighborhood characteristics on PA might be obscured since both variables were measured subjectively. Devices related information/communication technologies increase IPA; we need to find novel ways to use these devices for PA promotion. There is also a need to increase structured PA opportunities.

Keywords

• Physical activity
• Inactivity
• Students
• Neighborhood characteristics

References

1. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S197-239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663.
2. Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1479- 5868-7-40.
3. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
4. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012;380:247-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(12)60646-1.
5. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory Data. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity among school going adolescents. Data by country. https://www.who.int/data/gho/ data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/insufficiently-active- (crude-estimate). Accessed November 10, 2021.
6. Ding D, Sallis JF, Kerr J, Lee S, Rosenberg DE. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth a review. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:442-55.
7. Roberts JD, Knight B, Ray R, Saelens BE. Parental perceived built environment measures and active play in Washington DC metropolitan children. Prev Med Rep 2016;3:373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.04.001.
8. Carver A, Timperio A, Hesketh K, Crawford D. Are children and adolescents less active if parents restrict their physical activity and active transport due to perceived risk? Soc Sci Med 2010;70:1799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.010.

9. Coombes E, van Sluijs E, Jones A. Is environmental setting associated with the intensity and duration of children’s physical activity? Findings from the SPEEDY GPS study. Health Place 2013;20:62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.11.008.
10. Davison KK, Lawson CT. Do attributes in the physical environment influence children’s physical activity? A review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-19.
11. Duncan MJ, Birch S, Woodfield L, Al-Nakeeb Y. Perceptions of the built environment in relation to physical activity and weight status in british adolescents from central England. ISRN Obes 2012;2012:903846. doi: 10.5402/2012/903846.
12. Mitchell CA, Clark AF, Gilliland JA. Built Environment Influences of Children’s Physical Activity: Examining Differences by Neighbourhood Size and Sex. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13:130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010130.
13. Tappe KA, Glanz K, Sallis JF, Zhou C, Saelens BE. Children’s physical activity and parents’ perception of the neighborhood environment: neighborhood impact on kids study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:39. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-39
14. Timperio A, Crawford D, Telford A, Salmon J. Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. Prev Med 2004;38:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j. ypmed.2003.09.026.
15. Suglia SF, Shelton RC, Hsiao A, Wang YC, Rundle A, Link BG. Why the neighborhood social environment is critical in obesity prevention. J Urban Health 2016;93:206-12.
16. Franzini L, Elliott MN, Cuccaro P, et al. Influences of physical and social neighborhood environments on children’s physical activity and obesity. Am J Public Health 2009;99:271-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.128702
17. Molnar BE, Gortmaker SL, Bull FC, Buka SL. Unsafe to play? Neighborhood disorder and lack of safety predict reduced physical activity among urban children and adolescents. Am J Health Promot 2004;18:378-86. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171- 18.5.378.
18. Ozbil A, Yesiltepe D, Argin G, Rybarczyk G. Children’s active school travel: examining the combined perceived and objective built-environment factors from space syntax. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010286. .
19. Ekşioğlu Çetintahra G, Çubukçu E. How do children’s moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels vary in different settings? Planlama 2018;28:236-251 doi: 10.14744/ planlama.2018.65487
20. Ekşioğlu Çetintahra G, Çubukçu E. The Effect of perceived physical environment on children’s physical activity. Planlama 2015;25:205-11 doi: 10.5505/planlama.2015.32932
21. Revenue Administration. Arsa ve Arazi Asgari Metrekare Birim Değerleri. https://www.gib.gov.tr/yardim-ve-kaynaklar/ yayinlar/arsa-ve-arazi-asgari-metrekare-birim-degerleri. (Accessed on November 13, 2021)
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2019] Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. Available at: www.cdc. gov/yrbs. (Accessed on November 13, 2021)
23. Roberts JD, Ray R, Biles AD, Knight B, Saelens BE. Built environment and active play among Washington DC metropolitan children: A protocol for a cross-sectional study Arch Public Health 2015;73:22. doi: 10.1186/s13690.015.0070- 3.
24. de Moraes AC, Guerra PH, Menezes PR. The worldwide prevalence of insufficient physical activity in adolescents; a systematic review. Nutr Hosp 2013;28:575-84. doi: 10.3305/ nh.2013.28.3.6398.
25. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012;380:219-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031- 9.
26. Inchley J, Currie D, Jewell J, Breda J, Barnekow, V. Adolescent obesity and related behaviours: trends and inequalities in the WHO European Region, 2002–2014: observations from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) WHO collaborative cross-national study. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/329417. (Accessed on June 20, 2022.)
27. Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:963-75. doi: 10.1097/00005.768.200005000- 00014.
28. Zagalaz-Sánchez ML, Cachón-Zagalaz J, Sánchez-Zafra M, Lara-Sánchez A. Mini review of the use of the mobile phone and its repercussion in the deficit of physical activity. Front Psychol 2019;10:1307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01307.
29. Csibi S, Marieta GG, Melinda F, Monika C, Csilla-Júlia B, Grecu G. Smartphone use and addiction vulnerability related to specificities of physical activity in school-aged children. Acta Med Marisiensis 2016;62.
30. Dumuid D, Olds TS, Lewis LK, Maher C. Does home equipment contribute to socioeconomic gradients in Australian children’s physical activity, sedentary time and screen time? BMC Public Health 2016;16:736. doi: 10.1186/s12889.016.3419-9.
31. Ferrari GL, Araújo TL, Oliveira LC, Matsudo V, Fisberg M. Association between electronic equipment in the bedroom and sedentary lifestyle, physical activity, and body mass index of children. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2015;91:574-82. doi: 10.1016/j. jped.2015.01.009.
32. Wei X, Zang Y, Jia X, et al. Age, period and cohort effects and the predictors of physical activity and sedentary behaviour among Chinese children, from 2004 to 2011. BMC Public Health 2017;17:353. doi: 10.1186/s12889.017.4215-x.
33. Wong BY, Cerin E, Ho SY, Mak KK, Lo WS, Lam TH. Adolescents’ physical activity: competition between perceived neighborhood sport facilities and home media resources. Int J Pediatr Obes 2010 Apr;5:169-76. doi: 10.3109/174.771.60903159432.
34. Jago R, Macdonald-Wallis C, Solomon-Moore E, Thompson JL, Lawlor DA, Sebire SJ. Associations between participation in organised physical activity in the school or community outside school hours and neighbourhood play with child physical activity and sedentary time: a cross-sectional analysis of primary school-aged children from the UK. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017588.
35. Gordon-Larsen P, McMurray RG, Popkin BM. Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics 2000;105:E83. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.e83.
36. Ceschini FL, Andrade DR, Oliveira LC, Araújo Júnior JF, Matsudo VK. Prevalence of physical inactivity and associated factors among high school students from state’s public schools. Jornal de pediatria 2009;85:301-6. doi:10.2223/JPED.1915
37. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. Physical Education and Sport at School in Europe Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://eacea. ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice. (Accessed on June 20, 2022.)
38. Bastos JP, Araujo CL, Hallal PC. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity and associated factors in Brazilian adolescents. J Phys Act Health 2008;5:777-94.
39. Barr-Anderson DJ, Robinson-O’Brien R, Haines J, Hannan P, Neumark-Sztainer D. Parental report versus child perception of familial support: which is more associated with child physical activity and television use? J Phys Act Health 2010;7:364-8. doi:10.1123/jpah.7.3.364