ROLE OF FAMILY MEDICINE IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION

Abstract

Family physicians in medical education can enhance clinical learning of the following;
• knowledge and awareness of the principles and application of health promotion and disease prevention,
• awareness of psycho-social, cultural, familial, and socioeconomic aspects of medical problems as they relate to patient management,
• role of the family physician within the health care delivery system and understanding of general practice in real life experience.
All these objectives are relevant with the global aim of optimal primary care. As medical care is changed by proper medical education, it will be necessary to utilize family medicine and family physicians in undergraduate medical education as role models for students. In a medical education system that only promotes post graduate medical education on specialties but not general medicine, it is obvious that the student will not be motivated about primary care or the health needs of the community.
In order to inject that kind of perspective to the medical students, changing or at least
integrating, community- based education or primary care- based rotations with family physicians as mentors, is not only an international but also a national requirement because primary care is what most of the graduates will be dealing with.
Key Words: Family medicine, Undergraduate Medical examination, National needs,

References

1. World Health Organization. From Alma-Ata to the year 2000: reflections at the midpoint. Geneva, Switzerland, 1988: 13.
2. World Health Organization and The World Organization of Family Doctors. Making medical practice and education more relevant to people's needs: the contribution of the family doctor. A working paper of the WHO- WOHCA Conference. Ontario, Canada Piovember 6-8, 1994:33-36.
3. Priorities at the interface of health care, medical practice and medical education: report of the global conference on international collaboration on medical education and practice, 12-15 June 1994. Rockford, Illinois, USA. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1995:6.
4. Working paHy of Turkish Medical Association.
5. Essential subjects in medical education that are advised to reform. In: Sayek /, Rihg B, eds. Undergraduate medical education report. Ankara: Turkish Medical Association,
6. :21-24.
7. Metcalfe D. Family medicine: from the periphery in medical education. Sri Lankan Fam Physic 1999;22:3-7
8. Kalantan K, Pyrne Pi, Al-Faris E, Al-Taweel A, Al-Rowais Pi, Abdul Ghani H. Students' perceptions towards a family medicine attachment experience. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2003 Piov; 16:357-365.

9. Bowman CR. Continuing family medicine's unique contribution to rural health care. Am Fam Physici 1996;54(2). Available on line, www. aafp. org/afp/100196/med_soc. html. on September, 1, 2004.
10. Ackerman RJ, Comeaux RW. Mercer University School of Medicine: a sucessful approach to primary care medical education. Fam Med 1996;28:395-402.
11. Pemra C. Unalan, et al.
12. World Health Organization. Frontline doctors of tomorrow. World Health 1994;4 7:19-20.
13. Crump WJ, Boisaubin E, Camp L. The community continuity experience: generalist training for preclinical medical students. Tex Med 1998;94:58-63.
14. Rabinowitz HE. The relationship between medical student career choice and a required
15. third-year family practice clerkship. Earn Med 1988:20:118-121.
16. Maple S/4, Jones TA, Bahn TJ, Riovsky RD, O'Hara BS, Bogdewic SP. Tracking the contribution of a family medicine clerkship to the clinical curriculum. Pam Med 199:30: 332-337.